James D Sharer1, Fidias E Leon-Sarmiento1, James F Morley2,3, Daniel Weintraub4, Richard L Doty1. 1. Smell and Taste Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology:, Head and Neck Surgery Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 2. Parkinson's Disease Research, Education and Clinical Center, Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is compelling evidence from over 60 epidemiological studies that smoking significantly reduces the risk of Parkinson's disease (PD). In general, those who currently smoke cigarettes, as well as those with a past history of such smoking, have a reduced risk of PD compared to those who have never smoked. Recently it has been suggested that a cardinal nonmotor sensory symptom of PD, olfactory dysfunction, may be less severe in PD patients who smoke than in PD patients who do not, in contrast to the negative effect of smoking on olfaction described in the general population. METHODS: We evaluated University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) scores from 323 PD patients and 323 controls closely matched individually on age, sex, and smoking history (never, past, or current). RESULTS: Patients exhibited much lower UPSIT scores than did the controls (P < 0.0001). The relative decline in dysfunction of the current PD smokers was less than that of the never- and past-PD smokers (respective Ps = 0.0005 and 0.0019). Female PD patients outperformed their male counterparts by a larger margin than did the female controls (3.66 vs. 1.07 UPSIT points; respective Ps < 0.0001 and 0.06). Age-related declines in UPSIT scores were generally present (P < 0.0001). No association between the olfactory measure and smoking dose, as indexed by pack-years, was evident. CONCLUSIONS: PD patients who currently smoke do not exhibit the smoking-related decline in olfaction observed in non-PD control subjects who currently smoke. The physiological basis of this phenomenon is yet to be defined.
BACKGROUND: There is compelling evidence from over 60 epidemiological studies that smoking significantly reduces the risk of Parkinson's disease (PD). In general, those who currently smoke cigarettes, as well as those with a past history of such smoking, have a reduced risk of PD compared to those who have never smoked. Recently it has been suggested that a cardinal nonmotor sensory symptom of PD, olfactory dysfunction, may be less severe in PDpatients who smoke than in PDpatients who do not, in contrast to the negative effect of smoking on olfaction described in the general population. METHODS: We evaluated University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) scores from 323 PDpatients and 323 controls closely matched individually on age, sex, and smoking history (never, past, or current). RESULTS:Patients exhibited much lower UPSIT scores than did the controls (P < 0.0001). The relative decline in dysfunction of the current PD smokers was less than that of the never- and past-PD smokers (respective Ps = 0.0005 and 0.0019). Female PDpatients outperformed their male counterparts by a larger margin than did the female controls (3.66 vs. 1.07 UPSIT points; respective Ps < 0.0001 and 0.06). Age-related declines in UPSIT scores were generally present (P < 0.0001). No association between the olfactory measure and smoking dose, as indexed by pack-years, was evident. CONCLUSIONS:PDpatients who currently smoke do not exhibit the smoking-related decline in olfaction observed in non-PD control subjects who currently smoke. The physiological basis of this phenomenon is yet to be defined.
Authors: Emma Ådén; Maine Carlsson; Eric Poortvliet; Hans Stenlund; Jan Linder; Mona Edström; Lars Forsgren; Lena Håglin Journal: Nutr Neurosci Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.994
Authors: Raegan P Chambers; Gerald B Call; David Meyer; Justin Smith; Jared A Techau; Krista Pearman; Lori M Buhlman Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Nathalie Mandairon; Shane T Peace; Karim Boudadi; Christine E Boxhorn; Venkata Anupama Narla; Sara D Suffis; Thomas A Cleland Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Xiuli Dan; Noah Wechter; Samuel Gray; Joy G Mohanty; Deborah L Croteau; Vilhelm A Bohr Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2021-07-27 Impact factor: 11.788
Authors: Shima T Moein; Seyed MohammadReza Hashemian; Babak Mansourafshar; Ali Khorram-Tousi; Payam Tabarsi; Richard L Doty Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 5.426
Authors: Heike Rebholz; Ralf J Braun; Dennis Ladage; Wolfgang Knoll; Christoph Kleber; Achim W Hassel Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 4.003