Literature DB >> 25545574

Impact of selection strategies on representation of underserved populations and intention to practise: international findings.

Sarah Larkins1, Kristien Michielsen, Jehu Iputo, Salwa Elsanousi, Marykutty Mammen, Lisa Graves, Sara Willems, Fortunato L Cristobal, Rex Samson, Rachel Ellaway, Simone Ross, Karen Johnston, Anselme Derese, André-Jacques Neusy.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Socially accountable medical schools aim to reduce health inequalities by training workforces responsive to the priority health needs of underserved communities. One key strategy involves recruiting students from underserved and unequally represented communities on the basis that they may be more likely to return and address local health priorities. This study describes the impacts of different selection strategies of medical schools that aspire to social accountability on the presence of students from underserved communities in their medical education programmes and on student practice intentions.
METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire was administered to students starting medical education in five institutions with a social accountability mandate in five different countries. The questionnaire assessed students' background characteristics, rurality of background, and practice intentions (location, discipline of practice and population to be served). The results were compared with the characteristics of students entering medical education in schools with standard selection procedures, and with publicly available socio-economic data.
RESULTS: The selection processes of all five schools included strategies that extended beyond the assessment of academic achievement. Four distinct strategies were identified: the quota system; selection based on personal attributes; community involvement, and school marketing strategies. Questionnaire data from 944 students showed that students at the five schools were more likely to be of non-urban origin, of lower socio-economic status and to come from underserved groups. A total of 407 of 810 (50.2%) students indicated an intention to practise in a non-urban area after graduation and the likelihood of this increased with increasing rurality of primary schooling (p = 0.000). Those of rural origin were statistically less likely to express an intention to work abroad (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Selection strategies to ensure that members of underserved communities can pursue medical careers can be effective in achieving a fair and equitable representation of underserved communities within the student body. Such strategies may contribute to a diverse medical student body with strong intentions to work with underserved populations.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25545574     DOI: 10.1111/medu.12518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  19 in total

1.  Nonacademic Attributes Predict Medical and Nursing Student Intentions to Emigrate or to Work Rurally: An Eight-Country Survey in Asia and Africa.

Authors:  David M Silvestri; Meridith Blevins; Kenneth A Wallston; Arfan R Afzal; Nazmul Alam; Ben Andrews; Miliard Derbew; Simran Kaur; Mwapatsa Mipando; Charles A Mkony; Philip M Mwachaka; Nirju Ranjit; Sten H Vermund
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Examining the predictors of academic outcomes for indigenous Māori, Pacific and rural students admitted into medicine via two equity pathways: a retrospective observational study at the University of Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand.

Authors:  Elana Curtis; Erena Wikaire; Yannan Jiang; Louise McMillan; Robert Loto; Phillippa Poole; Mark Barrow; Warwick Bagg; Papaarangi Reid
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-27       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Are efforts to attract graduate applicants to UK medical schools effective in increasing the participation of under-represented socioeconomic groups? A national cohort study.

Authors:  Ben Kumwenda; Jennifer Cleland; Rachel Greatrix; Rhoda Katharine MacKenzie; Gordon Prescott
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Factors influencing medical students' motivation to practise in rural areas in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shyam Sundar Budhathoki; Prisca A C Zwanikken; Paras K Pokharel; Albert J Scherpbier
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Impact of medical student origins on the likelihood of ultimately practicing in areas of low vs high socio-economic status.

Authors:  Ian B Puddey; Denese E Playford; Annette Mercer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Practice intentions at entry to and exit from medical schools aspiring to social accountability: findings from the Training for Health Equity Network Graduate Outcome Study.

Authors:  Sarah Larkins; Karen Johnston; John C Hogenbirk; Sara Willems; Salwa Elsanousi; Marykutty Mammen; Kaatje Van Roy; Jehu Iputo; Fortunato L Cristobal; Jennene Greenhill; Charlie Labarda; Andre-Jacques Neusy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  The dynamics of poverty, educational attainment, and the children of the disadvantaged entering medical school.

Authors:  Aaron D Baugh; Allison A Vanderbilt; Reginald F Baugh
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2019-08-21

8.  Mini-med school for Aboriginal youth: experiential science outreach to tackle systemic barriers.

Authors:  Rita I Henderson; Keri Williams; Lynden Lindsay Crowshoe
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2015-12-23

9.  Training for impact: the socio-economic impact of a fit for purpose health workforce on communities.

Authors:  Björg Pálsdóttir; Jean Barry; Andreia Bruno; Hugh Barr; Amy Clithero; Nadia Cobb; Jan De Maeseneer; Elsie Kiguli-Malwadde; André-Jacques Neusy; Scott Reeves; Roger Strasser; Paul Worley
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2016-08-15

10.  Does initial postgraduate career intention and social demographics predict perceived career behaviour? A national cross-sectional survey of UK postgraduate doctors.

Authors:  Gillian Marion Scanlan; Jennifer Cleland; Suzanne Anderson Stirling; Kim Walker; Peter Johnston
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.