Literature DB >> 25545380

The effect of 6 versus 9 years of zoledronic acid treatment in osteoporosis: a randomized second extension to the HORIZON-Pivotal Fracture Trial (PFT).

Dennis M Black1, Ian R Reid, Jane A Cauley, Felicia Cosman, Ping Chung Leung, Peter Lakatos, Kurt Lippuner, Steven R Cummings, Trisha F Hue, Amitava Mukhopadhyay, Monique Tan, R Paul Aftring, Richard Eastell.   

Abstract

While bisphosphonates reduce fracture risk over 3 to 5 years, the optimal duration of treatment is uncertain. In a randomized extension study (E1) of the Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly-Pivotal Fracture Trial (HORIZON-PFT), zoledronic acid (ZOL) 5 mg annually for 6 years showed maintenance of bone mineral density (BMD), decrease in morphometric vertebral fractures, and a modest reduction in bone turnover markers (BTMs) compared with discontinuation after 3 years. To investigate the longer-term efficacy and safety of ZOL, a second extension (E2) was conducted to 9 years in which women on ZOL for 6 years in E1 were randomized to either ZOL (Z9) or placebo (Z6P3) for 3 additional years. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, 190 women were randomized to Z9 (n = 95) and Z6P3 (n = 95). The primary endpoint was change in total hip BMD at year 9 vs. year 6 in Z9 compared with Z6P3. Other secondary endpoints included fractures, BTMs, and safety. From year 6 to 9, the mean change in total hip BMD was -0.54% in Z9 vs. -1.31% in Z6P3 (difference 0.78%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.37%, 1.93%; p = 0.183). BTMs showed small, non-significant increases in those who discontinued after 6 years compared with those who continued for 9 years. The number of fractures was low and did not significantly differ by treatment. While generally safe, there was a small increase in cardiac arrhythmias (combined serious and non-serious) in the Z9 group but no significant imbalance in other safety parameters. The results suggest almost all patients who have received six annual ZOL infusions can stop medication for up to 3 years with apparent maintenance of benefits.
© 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANTIRESORPTIVES; BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS OF BONE TURNOVER; FRACTURE PREVENTION; OSTEOPOROSIS; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25545380     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  50 in total

1.  Denosumab after 8 years.

Authors:  I R Reid
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Bisphosphonate drug holidays: we reap what we sow.

Authors:  S L Silverman; J D Adachi; E Dennison
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  The next step after anti-osteoporotic drug discontinuation: an up-to-date review of sequential treatment.

Authors:  Núria Guañabens; María Jesús Moro-Álvarez; Enrique Casado; Josep Blanch-Rubió; Carlos Gómez-Alonso; Guillermo Martínez Díaz-Guerra; Javier Del Pino-Montes; Carmen Valero Díaz de Lamadrid; Pilar Peris; Manuel Muñoz-Torres
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of bisphosphonate drug holidays on bone mineral density and osteoporotic fracture risk.

Authors:  S Nayak; S L Greenspan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Fracture risk following intermission of osteoporosis therapy.

Authors:  E M Dennison; C Cooper; J A Kanis; O Bruyère; S Silverman; E McCloskey; B Abrahamsen; D Prieto-Alhambra; S Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Comments on Kamimura et al.: significant improvement of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers by denosumab therapy in bisphosphonate-unresponsive patients.

Authors:  S J Fu; Z F Sheng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Using Osteoporosis Therapies in Combination.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 8.  Intravenous zoledronate for osteoporosis: less might be more.

Authors:  Andrew Grey
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 5.346

9.  [Osteoporosis-specific treatment when and how?]

Authors:  Karoline Schulz; Hendrik Lehnert
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 10.  Current Treatments and New Developments in the Management of Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Hennie G Raterman; Irene E M Bultink; Willem F Lems
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.