Literature DB >> 25544826

Progress on Developing Adaptive Optics-Optical Coherence Tomography for In Vivo Retinal Imaging: Monitoring and Correction of Eye Motion Artifacts.

Robert J Zawadzki1, Arlie G Capps2, Dae Yu Kim3, Athanasios Panorgias3, Scott B Stevenson4, Bernd Hamann5, John S Werner3.   

Abstract

Recent progress in retinal image acquisition techniques, including optical coherence tomography (OCT) and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO), combined with improved performance of adaptive optics (AO) instrumentation, has resulted in improvement in the quality of in vivo images of cellular structures in the human retina. Here, we present a short review of progress on developing AO-OCT instruments. Despite significant progress in imaging speed and resolution, eye movements present during acquisition of a retinal image with OCT introduce motion artifacts into the image, complicating analysis and registration. This effect is especially pronounced in high-resolution datasets acquired with AO-OCT instruments. Several retinal tracking systems have been introduced to correct retinal motion during data acquisition. We present a method for correcting motion artifacts in AO-OCT volume data after acquisition using simultaneously captured adaptive optics-scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AO-SLO) images. We extract transverse eye motion data from the AO-SLO images, assign a motion adjustment vector to each AO-OCT A-scan, and re-sample from the scattered data back onto a regular grid. The corrected volume data improve the accuracy of quantitative analyses of microscopic structures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aberration compensation; adaptive optics; imaging system; motion artifact correction; ophthalmology; optical coherence tomography; scanning laser ophthalmoscopy

Year:  2014        PMID: 25544826      PMCID: PMC4276343          DOI: 10.1109/JSTQE.2013.2288302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron        ISSN: 1077-260X            Impact factor:   4.544


  73 in total

1.  Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  R H Webb; G W Hughes; F C Delori
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1987-04-15       Impact factor: 1.980

Review 2.  High-speed optical coherence tomography: basics and applications.

Authors:  Maciej Wojtkowski
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Adaptive optics-optical coherence tomography: optimizing visualization of microscopic retinal structures in three dimensions.

Authors:  Robert J Zawadzki; Stacey S Choi; Steven M Jones; Scot S Oliver; John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity.

Authors:  P Thévenaz; U E Ruttimann; M Unser
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 10.856

5.  Multimodal assessment of microscopic morphology and retinal function in patients with geographic atrophy.

Authors:  Athanasios Panorgias; Robert J Zawadzki; Arlie G Capps; Allan A Hunter; Lawrence S Morse; John S Werner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Megahertz OCT for ultrawide-field retinal imaging with a 1050 nm Fourier domain mode-locked laser.

Authors:  Thomas Klein; Wolfgang Wieser; Christoph M Eigenwillig; Benjamin R Biedermann; Robert Huber
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics.

Authors:  J Liang; D R Williams; D T Miller
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  High resolution multimodal clinical ophthalmic imaging system.

Authors:  Mircea Mujat; R Daniel Ferguson; Ankit H Patel; Nicusor Iftimia; Niyom Lue; Daniel X Hammer
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Reflective afocal broadband adaptive optics scanning ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Alfredo Dubra; Yusufu Sulai
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Real-time eye motion correction in phase-resolved OCT angiography with tracking SLO.

Authors:  Boy Braaf; Kari V Vienola; Christy K Sheehy; Qiang Yang; Koenraad A Vermeer; Pavan Tiruveedhula; David W Arathorn; Austin Roorda; Johannes F de Boer
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  8 in total

1.  In-vivo digital wavefront sensing using swept source OCT.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar; Lara M Wurster; Matthias Salas; Laurin Ginner; Wolfgang Drexler; Rainer A Leitgeb
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  Adaptive optics optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.

Authors:  Zachary M Dong; Gadi Wollstein; Bo Wang; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 3.  Involuntary eye motion correction in retinal optical coherence tomography: Hardware or software solution?

Authors:  Ahmadreza Baghaie; Zeyun Yu; Roshan M D'Souza
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Austin Roorda; Jacque L Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.422

Review 5.  Adaptive optics imaging of the human retina.

Authors:  Stephen A Burns; Ann E Elsner; Kaitlyn A Sapoznik; Raymond L Warner; Thomas J Gast
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  Multi-modal adaptive optics system including fundus photography and optical coherence tomography for the clinical setting.

Authors:  Matthias Salas; Wolfgang Drexler; Xavier Levecq; Barbara Lamory; Markus Ritter; Sonja Prager; Julia Hafner; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth; Michael Pircher
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 7.  A Review of Adaptive Optics Optical Coherence Tomography: Technical Advances, Scientific Applications, and the Future.

Authors:  Ravi S Jonnal; Omer P Kocaoglu; Robert J Zawadzki; Zhuolin Liu; Donald T Miller; John S Werner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Impact of CMOS Pixel and Electronic Circuitry in the Performance of a Hartmann-Shack Wavefront Sensor.

Authors:  Úrsula Vasconcelos Abecassis; Davies William de Lima Monteiro; Luciana Pedrosa Salles; Carlos Augusto de Moraes Cruz; Pablo Nunes Agra Belmonte
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.