| Literature DB >> 25544771 |
Jinyu Kong1,2,3, Fangxiu Xu1, Jinli Qu1, Yu Wang1, Ming Gao1, Herbert Yu4, Biyun Qian1,3.
Abstract
Studies have suggested that vitamin D may have protective effects against cancer development or tumor progression. To search for additional evidence, we investigated the role of genetic polymorphisms involved in the vitamin D pathway in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated common genetic polymorphisms associated with the vitamin D pathway in relation to NSCLC in a case-control study of 603 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients and 661 matched healthy controls. Seven single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped, the expression of CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 were measured in 153 tumor samples and their associations with genotypes and patient survival were also analyzed. In the case-control comparison, we found SNP rs3782130 (CYP27B1), rs7041 (GC), rs6068816 and rs4809957 (CYP24A1) associated with NSCLC risk. The risk of NSCLC was increased with the number of risk alleles. CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 expression were significantly different between tumor and normal tissues in NSCLC. High CYP27B1 expression was associated with better overall survival, and the expression was different by the rs3782130 genotype. The study suggests that some genetic polymorphisms involved in the vitamin D pathway may associate with NSCLC risk, and one of the polymorphisms (rs3782130) may affect gene expression and patient survival.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25544771 PMCID: PMC4385872 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.2951
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Characteristics of NSCLC patients and healthy controls
| Variable | Number of subject(%) | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case (n=603) | Control (n=661) | ||
| Age (n=1264) | 0.433 | ||
| <60 | 297(49.3) | 311(47.0) | |
| ≥60 | 306(50.7) | 350(53.0) | |
| Gender (n=1264) | 0.439 | ||
| Male | 387(64.2) | 410(62.0) | |
| Female | 216(35.8) | 251(38.0) | |
| History of pulmonary disease (n=1214) | 0.789 | ||
| No | 540(89.6) | 550(90.0) | |
| Yes | 63(10.4) | 61(10.0) | |
| Family history of cancer (n=1255) | |||
| No | 498(82.9) | 594(90.8) | |
| Yes | 103(17.1) | 60(9.2) | |
| Smoking status (n=1264) | |||
| No | 202(33.5) | 382(57.8) | |
| Yes | 401(66.5) | 279(42.2) | |
| BMI (n=1248) | |||
| <24 | 279(46.7) | 227(34.9) | |
| ≥24 | 318(53.3) | 424(65.1) | |
Associations between NSCLC risk and individual SNPs involved in the vitamin D pathway
| Genotype | Number of subject (%) | P | OR | OR | OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case (n=603) | Control (n=661) | |||||
| CC | 229(38.0) | 230(34.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| CG | 297(49.3) | 371(56.1) | 0.82(0.63-1.06) | 0.90(0.70-1.15) | ||
| GG | 77(12.8) | 60(9.1) | 1.42(0.94-2.14) | |||
| TT | 235(39.0) | 243(36.8) | 0.331 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| TG | 273(45.3) | 326(49.4) | 0.87(0.67-1.13) | 0.92(0.72-1.17) | 1.19(0.85-1.66) | |
| GG | 94(15.6) | 91(13.8) | 1.10(0.76-1.58) | |||
| CC | 217(36.0) | 110(16.6) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| CT | 314(52.1) | 465(70.3) | 0.87(0.61-1.24) | |||
| TT | 72(11.9) | 86(13.0) | ||||
| GG | 234(38.8) | 228(34.5) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| GA | 309(51.2) | 406(61.4) | 0.88(0.69-1.12) | |||
| AA | 60(10.0) | 27(4.1) | ||||
| TT | 339(56.2) | 378(57.2) | 0.873 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| TC | 254(42.1) | 274(41.5) | 1.06(0.84-1.35) | 1.07(0.84-1.36) | 1.36(0.50-3.70) | |
| CC | 10(1.7) | 9(1.4) | 1.39(0.51-3.81) | |||
| GC (rs7041) | ||||||
| TT | 329(54.6) | 272(41.1) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| TG | 240(39.8) | 339(51.3) | 0.73(0.46-1.18) | |||
| GG | 34(5.6) | 50(7.6) | ||||
| GG | 252(41.9) | 246(37.2) | 0.216 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| GA | 270(44.9) | 326(49.3) | 0.82(0.64-1.06) | 0.83(0.65-1.06) | 0.96(0.68-1.36) | |
| AA | 80(13.3) | 89(13.5) | 0.86(0.59-1.25) | |||
| Number of risk-allele | ||||||
| 0 | 138(22.9) | 299(45.2) | 1.00 | |||
| 1 | 282(46.8) | 267(40.4) | ||||
| 2 | 147(24.4) | 83(12.6) | ||||
| 3 | 35(5.8) | 12(1.8) | ||||
OR: Odds Ratio adjusted by age, sex, family history of cancer and BMI.
CI: Confidence Interval.
① Homozygous wild genotype, ② heterozygous genotype, ③ homozygous variant genotype
Associations between NSCLC risk and SNPs by smoking status
| Genotype | Non-smoker | Smoker | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases (%) | Controls (%) | OR | Cases (%) | Controls (%) | OR | |
| CC+CG | 170(84.2) | 338(88.5) | 1.00 | 356(88.8) | 263(94.3) | 1.00 |
| GG | 32(15.8) | 44(11.5) | 1.38(0.83-2.30) | 45(11.2) | 16(5.7) | |
| P Value | 0.140 | |||||
| GG+GA | 181(89.6) | 364(95.3) | 1.00 | 362(90.3) | 270(96.8) | 1.00 |
| AA | 21(10.4) | 18(4.7) | 39(9.7) | 9(3.2) | ||
| P Value | ||||||
OR: Odds Ratio adjusted by age, sex, family history of cancer and BMI.
CI: Confidence Interval.
Figure 1RT-qPCR results on CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 expression in lung tumor (n =48) and non-tumor tissues (n =48)
Compared to non-tumor tissues, CYP27B1 mRNA expression was significantly lower in tumor tissues (p<0.001) (Figure 1A), and the expression of CYP24A1 was significantly higher in tumor tissues (p<0.001) (Figure 1B).
Figure 2Associations of CYP27B1 and CYP24A1expression with overall survival of 153 NSCLC patients
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients with high CYP27B1 expression had better overall survival than those with low CYP27B1 (p=0.018, Figure 2A). No significant association was found between CYP24A1 expression and NSCLC survival (p=0.621, Figure 2B).
Expression of CYP24A1 and CYP27B1 by their SNP genotypes
| Gene | Genotype | Case (n=153) | Mean ± SD | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | 53 | 5.60±0.66 | ||
| CG | 81 | 5.41±0.66 | ||
| GG | 19 | 5.14±0.58 | ||
| 0.316 | ||||
| GG | 56 | 5.64±0.76 | ||
| GA | 88 | 5.69±0.96 | ||
| AA | 8 | 6.15±0.79 | ||