Literature DB >> 25544555

Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws.

Yue-Fen Zou1, Bin Chu2, Chuan-Bing Wang3, Zhi-Yi Hu4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study was performed to evaluate magnetic resonance (MR) issues for the latest standard brands of plates and screws used in orthopedic surgery at a 1.5-T MR system, including the safety and metallic artifacts.
METHODS: The plates and screws (made of titanium alloy and stainless steel materials, according to the latest standard brands) were assessed for displacement in degrees, MRI-related heating and artifacts at a 1.5-T MR system. The displacement in degrees of the plates and screws was evaluated on an angel-measurement instrument at the entrance of the MR scanner. The MRI-related heating was assessed on a swine leg fixed with a plate by using a "worst-case" pulse sequence. A rectangular water phantom was designed to evaluate metallic artifacts of a screw on different sequences (T1/T2-weighted FSE, STIR, T2-FSE fat saturation, GRE, DWI) and then artifacts were evaluated on T2-weighted FSE sequence by modifying the scanning parameters including field of view (FOV), echo train length (ETL) and bandwidth to identify the influence of parameters on metallic artifacts. 15 volunteers with internal vertebral fixation (titanium alloy materials) were scanned with MR using axial and sagittal T2-FSE, sagittal T2-FSE fat suppression and STIR with conventional and optimized parameters, respectively. Then all images were graded by two experienced radiologists having the experience of more than 7 years under double-blind studies that is neither of them knew which was conventional parameter group and optimized parameter group.
RESULTS: The average deflection angle of titanium alloy and stainless steel implants were 4.3° and 7.7°, respectively, (less than 45°) which indicated that the magnetically induced force was less than the weight of the object. The deflection angle of the titanium alloy implants was less than the stainless steel one (t=9.69, P<0.001). The average temperature changes of titanium alloy before and after the scan was 0.48°C and stainless steel implants was 0.74°C, respectively, with the background temperature changes of 0.24°C. The water phantom test indicated that the DWI sequence produced largest artifacts, while FSE pulse sequence produced smallest artifacts. And T2-weighted FSE fat saturation sequence produced larger artifacts than STIR sequence. The influence of the scanning parameters on metallic artifacts was verified that metallic artifacts increased with longer echo train length and bigger FOV, while decreased with larger bandwidth. The interreader agreement was good or excellent for each set of images graded with Cohen's Kappa statistic. Image grading of axial and sagittal T2-FSE with optimized parameters were significantly superior to that with conventional parameters (grade, 3.3±0.5 vs 2.7±0.6, P=0.003; 3.2±0.4 vs 1.9±0.7, P=0.001) and image of STIR sequence received a better grade than T2-FSE FS sequence (grade, 3.4±0.5 vs 1.7±0.6, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The latest standard plates and screws used in orthopedic surgery do not pose an additional hazard or risk to patients undergoing MR imaging at 1.5-T or less. Though artifacts caused by them cannot be ignored because of their relatively large size, it is possible to be minimized by choosing appropriate pulse sequences and optimizing scanning parameters, such as FSE and STIR sequence with large bandwidth, small FOV and appropriate echo train length.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifacts; Magnetic resonance imaging; Orthopedic implant; Safety; Stainless steel; Titanium alloy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25544555     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  9 in total

1.  What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Component Loosening in THA?

Authors:  Alissa J Burge; Gabrielle P Konin; Jennifer L Berkowitz; Bin Lin; Matthew F Koff; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comparative study of fat-suppression techniques for hip arthroplasty MR imaging.

Authors:  Sébastien Molière; Jean-Philippe Dillenseger; Matthieu Ehlinger; Stéphane Kremer; Guillaume Bierry
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Assessment of magnetic field interactions and radiofrequency-radiation-induced heating of metallic spinal implants in 7 T field.

Authors:  Itsuko Tsukimura; Hideki Murakami; Makoto Sasaki; Hirooki Endo; Daisuke Yamabe; Ryosuke Oikawa; Minoru Doita
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Utilization of CT scanning associated with complex spine surgery.

Authors:  Vikas V Patel; Gunnar B J Andersson; Steven R Garfin; Donald L Resnick; Jon E Block
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Compatibility of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with orthopedic implants: manufacturer questionnaires.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Iwatsuki; Hidemasa Yoneda; Tetsuro Onishi; Hisao Ishii; Shigeru Kurimoto; Michiro Yamamoto; Masahiro Tatebe; Hitoshi Hirata
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.131

6.  Study on TiO2 Nanofilm That Reduces the Heat Production of Titanium Alloy Implant in Microwave Irradiation and Does Not Affect Fracture Healing.

Authors:  Yiming Xu; Zikai Hua; Yun Cai; Xianxuan Feng; Jiajia Yang; Jie Shen; Yuehong Bai
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 7.  [Metallic Artifacts on MR Imaging and Methods for Their Reduction].

Authors:  Hye Jung Choo; Sun Joo Lee; Young Han Lee
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2020-01-31

8.  Comparison of MRI Visualization Following Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Vadim A Byvaltsev; Andrei A Kalinin; Morgan B Giers; Valerii V Shepelev; Yurii Ya Pestryakov; Mikhail Yu Biryuchkov
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19

9.  Enchondromas and atypical cartilaginous tumors at the proximal humerus treated with intralesional resection and bone cement filling with or without osteosynthesis: retrospective analysis of 42 cases with 6 years mean follow-up.

Authors:  Georg W Omlor; Vera Lohnherr; Jessica Lange; Simone Gantz; Christian Merle; Joerg Fellenberg; Patric Raiss; Burkhard Lehner
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.754

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.