Literature DB >> 25543077

Slave to habit? Obesity is associated with decreased behavioural sensitivity to reward devaluation.

Annette Horstmann1, Anja Dietrich2, David Mathar3, Maria Pössel4, Arno Villringer5, Jane Neumann6.   

Abstract

The motivational value of food is lower during satiety compared to fasting. Dynamic changes in motivational value promote food seeking or meal cessation. In obesity this mechanism might be compromised since obese subjects ingest energy beyond homeostatic needs. Thus, lower adaptation of eating behaviour with respect to changes in motivational value might cause food overconsumption in obesity. To test this hypothesis, we implemented a selective satiation procedure to investigate the relationship between obesity and the size of the behavioural devaluation effect in humans. Lean to obese men (mean age 25.9, range 19-30 years; mean BMI 29.1, range 19.2-45.1 kg/m(2)) were trained on a free operant paradigm and learned to associate cues with the possibility to win different food rewards by pressing a button. After the initial training phase, one of the rewards was devalued by consumption. Response rates for and wanting of the different rewards were measured pre and post devaluation. Behavioural sensitivity to reward devaluation, measured as the magnitude of difference between pre and post responses, was regressed against BMI. Results indicate that (1) higher BMI compared to lower BMI in men led to an attenuated behavioural adjustment to reward devaluation, and (2) the decrease in motivational value was associated with the decrease in response rate between pre and post. Change in explicitly reported motivational value, however, was not affected by BMI. Thus, we conclude that high BMI in men is associated with lower behavioural adaptation with respect to changes in motivational value of food, possibly resulting in automatic overeating patterns that are hard to control in daily life.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Control of food intake; Devaluation; Goal-directed; Habitual; Obesity; Reward sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25543077     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  29 in total

Review 1.  Blaming the Brain for Obesity: Integration of Hedonic and Homeostatic Mechanisms.

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Berthoud; Heike Münzberg; Christopher D Morrison
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Obesity-Induced Structural and Neuronal Plasticity in the Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Jennifer L Thompson; Michael Drysdale; Corey Baimel; Manpreet Kaur; Taigan MacGowan; Kimberley A Pitman; Stephanie L Borgland
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 3.  The orbitofrontal cortex, food intake and obesity

Authors:  Lauren T. Seabrook; Stephanie L. Borgland
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.186

4.  Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveal the Neural Signatures of Dietary Self-Control?

Authors:  Cassandra J Lowe; Amy C Reichelt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Pathological Overeating: Emerging Evidence for a Compulsivity Construct.

Authors:  Catherine F Moore; Valentina Sabino; George F Koob; Pietro Cottone
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Dietary effects on the determinants of food choice: Impulsive choice, discrimination, incentive motivation, preference, and liking in male rats.

Authors:  Catherine C Steele; Jesseca R A Pirkle; Ian R Davis; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Food for thought: diet-induced impairments to decision-making and amelioration by N-acetylcysteine in male rats.

Authors:  Serena Becchi; Joshua Hood; Michael D Kendig; Aida Mohammadkhani; Megan L Shipman; Bernard W Balleine; Stephanie L Borgland; Laura H Corbit
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 4.415

8.  CB1 antagonism produces behaviors more consistent with satiety than reduced reward value in food-maintained responding in rats.

Authors:  Emily E Thompson; Julia E Jagielo-Miller; V Kiran Vemuri; Alexandros Makriyannis; Peter J McLaughlin
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.153

9.  Secondary rewards acquire enhanced incentive motivation via increasing anticipatory activity of the lateral orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  X Yang; X Liu; Y Zeng; R Wu; W Zhao; F Xin; S Yao; K M Kendrick; R P Ebstein; B Becker
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 10.  Decoding the Role of Gut-Microbiome in the Food Addiction Paradigm.

Authors:  Marta G Novelle
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.