Jennifer L Pearson1, Cassandra A Stanton2, Sarah Cha3, Raymond S Niaura2, George Luta4, Amanda L Graham2. 1. Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Legacy, Washington, DC; Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; jpearson@legacyforhealth.org. 2. Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Legacy, Washington, DC; Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center/Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; 3. Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Legacy, Washington, DC; 4. Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center/Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence from observational studies regarding the association between electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use and cessation is mixed and difficult to interpret. Utilizing 2 analytic methods, this study illustrates challenges common in analyses of observational data, highlights measurement challenges, and reports associations between e-cigarette use and smoking cessation. METHODS: Data were drawn from an ongoing web-based smoking cessation trial. The sample was comprised of 2,123 participants with complete 3-month follow-up data. Logistic regression models with and without entropy balancing to control for confounds were conducted to evaluate the association between e-cigarette use and 30-day cigarette smoking abstinence. RESULTS: At follow-up, 31.7% of participants reported using e-cigarettes to quit in the past 3 months. E-cigarette users differed from nonusers on baseline characteristics including cigarettes per day, Fagerström score, quit attempt in the past year, and previous use of e-cigarettes to quit. At follow-up, e-cigarette users made more quit attempts and employed more cessation aids than smokers who did not use e-cigarettes to quit. E-cigarette use was negatively associated with abstinence after adjustment for baseline characteristics; however, the association was not significant after additional adjustment for use of other cessation aids at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude and significance of the estimated association between e-cigarette use and cessation in this study were dependent upon the analytical approach. Observational studies should employ multiple analytic approaches to address threats to validity. Future research should employ better measures of patterns of and reasons for e-cigarette use, frequency of e-cigarette use, and concurrent use of cessation aids.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Evidence from observational studies regarding the association between electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use and cessation is mixed and difficult to interpret. Utilizing 2 analytic methods, this study illustrates challenges common in analyses of observational data, highlights measurement challenges, and reports associations between e-cigarette use and smoking cessation. METHODS: Data were drawn from an ongoing web-based smoking cessation trial. The sample was comprised of 2,123 participants with complete 3-month follow-up data. Logistic regression models with and without entropy balancing to control for confounds were conducted to evaluate the association between e-cigarette use and 30-day cigarette smoking abstinence. RESULTS: At follow-up, 31.7% of participants reported using e-cigarettes to quit in the past 3 months. E-cigarette users differed from nonusers on baseline characteristics including cigarettes per day, Fagerström score, quit attempt in the past year, and previous use of e-cigarettes to quit. At follow-up, e-cigarette users made more quit attempts and employed more cessation aids than smokers who did not use e-cigarettes to quit. E-cigarette use was negatively associated with abstinence after adjustment for baseline characteristics; however, the association was not significant after additional adjustment for use of other cessation aids at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude and significance of the estimated association between e-cigarette use and cessation in this study were dependent upon the analytical approach. Observational studies should employ multiple analytic approaches to address threats to validity. Future research should employ better measures of patterns of and reasons for e-cigarette use, frequency of e-cigarette use, and concurrent use of cessation aids.
Authors: Sarah E Adkison; Richard J O'Connor; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Andrew Hyland; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; K Michael Cummings; Ann McNeill; James F Thrasher; David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Stuart G Ferguson; Joseph G Gitchell; Saul Shiffman; Mark A Sembower; Jeffrey M Rohay; Jane Allen Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2011-02-13 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Lindsay F Stead; Rafael Perera; Chris Bullen; David Mant; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Kate Cahill; Tim Lancaster Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-11-14
Authors: Amanda L Graham; Sarah Cha; George D Papandonatos; Nathan K Cobb; Aaron Mushro; Ye Fang; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams Journal: Trials Date: 2013-02-17 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Amanda Richardson; Amanda L Graham; Nathan Cobb; Haijun Xiao; Aaron Mushro; David Abrams; Donna Vallone Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2013-01-28 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Cristine D Delnevo; Daniel P Giovenco; Michael B Steinberg; Andrea C Villanti; Jennifer L Pearson; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: David T Levy; K Michael Cummings; Andrea C Villanti; Ray Niaura; David B Abrams; Geoffrey T Fong; Ron Borland Journal: Addiction Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Jennifer L Pearson; Sara C Hitchman; Leonie S Brose; Linda Bauld; Allison M Glasser; Andrea C Villanti; Ann McNeill; David B Abrams; Joanna E Cohen Journal: Tob Control Date: 2017-06-17 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Alison Breland; Eric Soule; Alexa Lopez; Carolina Ramôa; Ahmad El-Hellani; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 5.691