Literature DB >> 25542704

Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of solvent systems for countercurrent separation.

J Brent Friesen1, Sana Ahmed2, Guido F Pauli3.   

Abstract

Rational solvent system selection for countercurrent chromatography and centrifugal partition chromatography technology (collectively known as countercurrent separation) studies continues to be a scientific challenge as the fundamental questions of comparing polarity range and selectivity within a solvent system family and between putative orthogonal solvent systems remain unanswered. The current emphasis on metabolomic investigations and analysis of complex mixtures necessitates the use of successive orthogonal countercurrent separation (CS) steps as part of complex fractionation protocols. Addressing the broad range of metabolite polarities demands development of new CS solvent systems with appropriate composition, polarity (π), selectivity (σ), and suitability. In this study, a mixture of twenty commercially available natural products, called the GUESSmix, was utilized to evaluate both solvent system polarity and selectively characteristics. Comparisons of GUESSmix analyte partition coefficient (K) values give rise to a measure of solvent system polarity range called the GUESSmix polarity index (GUPI). Solvatochromic dye and electrical permittivity measurements were also evaluated in quantitatively assessing solvent system polarity. The relative selectivity of solvent systems were evaluated with the GUESSmix by calculating the pairwise resolution (αip), the number of analytes found in the sweet spot (Nsw), and the pairwise resolution of those sweet spot analytes (αsw). The combination of these parameters allowed for both intra- and inter-family comparison of solvent system selectivity. Finally, 2-dimensional reciprocal shifted symmetry plots (ReSS(2)) were created to visually compare both the polarities and selectivities of solvent system pairs. This study helps to pave the way to the development of new solvent systems that are amenable to successive orthogonal CS protocols employed in metabolomic studies.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCC; CPC; Counter-current chromatography; Countercurrent chromatography; GUESSmix; centrifugal partition chromatography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25542704     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.11.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  8 in total

Review 1.  Countercurrent Separation of Natural Products: An Update.

Authors:  J Brent Friesen; James B McAlpine; Shao-Nong Chen; Guido F Pauli
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.050

2.  Sweet spot matching: A thin-layer chromatography-based countercurrent solvent system selection strategy.

Authors:  Yang Liu; J Brent Friesen; Edyta M Grzelak; Qingfei Fan; Ting Tang; Kemal Durić; Birgit U Jaki; James B McAlpine; Scott G Franzblau; Shao-Nong Chen; Guido F Pauli
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 4.759

3.  Selective Chlorophyll Removal Method to "Degreen" Botanical Extracts.

Authors:  Seon Beom Kim; Jonathan Bisson; J Brent Friesen; Guido F Pauli; Charlotte Simmler
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.050

Review 4.  Solvent System Selection Strategies in Countercurrent Separation.

Authors:  Yang Liu; J Brent Friesen; James B McAlpine; Guido F Pauli
Journal:  Planta Med       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Studying Mass Balance and the Stability of (Z)-Ligustilide from Angelica sinensis Helps to Bridge a Botanical Instability-Bioactivity Chasm.

Authors:  Kemal Duric; Yang Liu; Shao-Nong Chen; David C Lankin; Dejan Nikolic; James B McAlpine; J Brent Friesen; Guido F Pauli
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.050

6.  Real-Time Volumetric Phase Monitoring: Advancing Chemical Analysis by Countercurrent Separation.

Authors:  Guido F Pauli; Samuel M Pro; Lucas R Chadwick; Thomas Burdick; Luke Pro; Warren Friedl; Nick Novak; John Maltby; Feng Qiu; J Brent Friesen
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  DESIGNER Extracts as Tools to Balance Estrogenic and Chemopreventive Activities of Botanicals for Women's Health.

Authors:  Birgit M Dietz; Shao-Nong Chen; René F Ramos Alvarenga; Huali Dong; Dejan Nikolić; Martin Biendl; Richard B van Breemen; Judy L Bolton; Guido F Pauli
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 4.050

8.  Magnoflorine-Isolation and the Anticancer Potential against NCI-H1299 Lung, MDA-MB-468 Breast, T98G Glioma, and TE671 Rhabdomyosarcoma Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Estera Okon; Wirginia Kukula-Koch; Marta Halasa; Agata Jarzab; Marzena Baran; Magdalena Dmoszynska-Graniczka; Apostolis Angelis; Eleftherios Kalpoutzakis; Malgorzata Guz; Andrzej Stepulak; Anna Wawruszak
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-11-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.