Literature DB >> 25542676

Postacute rehabilitation quality of care: toward a shared conceptual framework.

Tiago Silva Jesus1, Helen Hoenig2.   

Abstract

There is substantial interest in mechanisms for measuring, reporting, and improving the quality of health care, including postacute care (PAC) and rehabilitation. Unfortunately, current activities generally are either too narrow or too poorly specified to reflect PAC rehabilitation quality of care. In part, this is caused by a lack of a shared conceptual understanding of what construes quality of care in PAC rehabilitation. This article presents the PAC-rehab quality framework: an evidence-based conceptual framework articulating elements specifically pertaining to PAC rehabilitation quality of care. The widely recognized Donabedian structure, process, and outcomes (SPO) model furnished the underlying structure for the PAC-rehab quality framework, and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framed the functional outcomes. A comprehensive literature review provided the evidence base to specify elements within the SPO model and ICF-derived framework. A set of macrolevel-outcomes (functional performance, quality of life of patient and caregivers, consumers' experience, place of discharge, health care utilization) were defined for PAC rehabilitation and then related to their (1) immediate and intermediate outcomes, (2) underpinning care processes, (3) supportive team functioning and improvement processes, and (4) underlying care structures. The role of environmental factors and centrality of patients in the framework are explicated as well. Finally, we discuss why outcomes may best measure and reflect the quality of PAC rehabilitation. The PAC-rehab quality framework provides a conceptually sound, evidence-based framework appropriate for quality of care activities across the PAC rehabilitation continuum.
Copyright © 2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Quality indicators, health care; Quality of health care; Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25542676     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  12 in total

1.  Associations between quality of health care and clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a rehabilitation cohort study.

Authors:  Anne-Lene Sand-Svartrud; Gunnhild Berdal; Maryam Azimi; Ingvild Bø; Turid Nygaard Dager; Siv Grødal Eppeland; Guro Ohldieck Fredheim; Anne Sirnes Hagland; Åse Klokkeide; Anita Dyb Linge; Joseph Sexton; Kjetil Tennebø; Helene Lindtvedt Valaas; Kristin Mjøsund; Hanne Dagfinrud; Ingvild Kjeken
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.562

2.  Factors associated with multiple hospital readmissions for individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Alexandra Canori; Amit Kumar; Shivayogi V Hiremath
Journal:  Commonhealth (Phila)       Date:  2020-09-28

3.  Person-centred rehabilitation: what exactly does it mean? Protocol for a scoping review with thematic analysis towards framing the concept and practice of person-centred rehabilitation.

Authors:  Tiago S Jesus; Felicity Bright; Nicola Kayes; Cheryl A Cott
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Human resources for health (and rehabilitation): Six Rehab-Workforce Challenges for the century.

Authors:  Tiago S Jesus; Michel D Landry; Gilles Dussault; Inês Fronteira
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2017-01-23

Review 5.  Characteristics of therapeutic alliance in musculoskeletal physiotherapy and occupational therapy practice: a scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Folarin Babatunde; Joy MacDermid; Norma MacIntyre
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Prioritization of rehabilitation Domains for establishing spinal cord injury high performance indicators using a modification of the Hanlon method: SCI-High Project.

Authors:  S Mohammad Alavinia; Sander L Hitzig; Farnoosh Farahani; Heather Flett; Mark Bayley; B Catharine Craven
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Development of the Rehabilitation Health Policy, Systems, and Services Research field: Quantitative Analyses of Publications over Time (1990-2017) and across Country Type.

Authors:  Tiago S Jesus; Helen Hoenig; Michel D Landry
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Quality of Care Indicators for Hospital Physical Therapy Units: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel Angel-Garcia; Ismael Martinez-Nicolas; Bianca Salmeri; Alizée Monot
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2022-02-01

Review 9.  Challenging rehabilitation environment for older patients.

Authors:  Lian Mj Tijsen; Els Wc Derksen; Wilco P Achterberg; Bianca I Buijck
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 10.  A Health Care Value Framework for Physical Therapy Primary Health Care Organizations.

Authors:  Rutger Friso IJntema; Di-Janne Barten; Hans B Duits; Brian V Tjemkes; Cindy Veenhof
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2021 Jan/Mar 01       Impact factor: 1.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.