Prue Cormie1, Brooke Turner2, Elizabeth Kaczmarek3, Deirdre Drake1, Suzanne K Chambers4. 1. Health and Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University (ECU), Joondalup, Australia. 2. Department of Corrective Services, Government of Western Australia in Perth. 3. Department of Psychology and Social Science, ECU. 4. Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To provide an in-depth description of the experience of supervised exercise programs among men with prostate cancer and to identify elements critical to optimizing engagement and ongoing exercise participation. DESIGN: Descriptive, qualitative. SETTING: A tertiary exercise oncology center in Perth, Australia. SAMPLE: 12 men with prostate cancer participating in a structured, clinic-based group exercise program supervised by accredited exercise physiologists. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Participants completed a demographic and health history questionnaire and a semistructured interview. Thematic content analysis was performed. FINDINGS: Participants described physiological and psychological health benefits, which reduced treatment-related side effects and positively affected self-efficacy, and identified exercise physiologists as providing information about the importance of exercise, as well as practical, emotional, and social support. Peer support encouraged discussion of shared experiences and a sense of social connection. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the current study expand on existing quantitative data to provide evidence of psychosocial benefits among men with prostate cancer involved with supervised exercise programs. The data provide insight into the components of exercise programs that can form a framework for the development of effective supportive care programs. INTERPRETATION: Involvement in a structured, clinic-based group exercise program provides men with prostate cancer with considerable benefits. Supervision by qualified exercise physiologists and incorporation of a group approach are critical components of maximizing those benefits.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To provide an in-depth description of the experience of supervised exercise programs among men with prostate cancer and to identify elements critical to optimizing engagement and ongoing exercise participation. DESIGN: Descriptive, qualitative. SETTING: A tertiary exercise oncology center in Perth, Australia. SAMPLE: 12 men with prostate cancer participating in a structured, clinic-based group exercise program supervised by accredited exercise physiologists. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Participants completed a demographic and health history questionnaire and a semistructured interview. Thematic content analysis was performed. FINDINGS:Participants described physiological and psychological health benefits, which reduced treatment-related side effects and positively affected self-efficacy, and identified exercise physiologists as providing information about the importance of exercise, as well as practical, emotional, and social support. Peer support encouraged discussion of shared experiences and a sense of social connection. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the current study expand on existing quantitative data to provide evidence of psychosocial benefits among men with prostate cancer involved with supervised exercise programs. The data provide insight into the components of exercise programs that can form a framework for the development of effective supportive care programs. INTERPRETATION: Involvement in a structured, clinic-based group exercise program provides men with prostate cancer with considerable benefits. Supervision by qualified exercise physiologists and incorporation of a group approach are critical components of maximizing those benefits.
Entities:
Keywords:
exercise; prostate cancer; supportive care; survivorship care
Authors: David Michael Langelier; Prue Cormie; William Bridel; Christopher Grant; Natalia Albinati; Jena Shank; Julia Teresa Daun; Tak S Fung; Colin Davey; S Nicole Culos-Reed Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Maike G Sweegers; Laurien M Buffart; Wouke M van Veldhuizen; Edwin Geleijn; Henk M W Verheul; Johannes Brug; Mai J M Chinapaw; Teatske M Altenburg Journal: Oncologist Date: 2018-11-13
Authors: Mette L K Schmidt; Peter Østergren; Prue Cormie; Anne-Mette Ragle; Jens Sønksen; Julie Midtgaard Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: L Fox; F Cahill; C Burgess; N Peat; S Rudman; J Kinsella; D Cahill; G George; A Santaolalla; M Van Hemelrijck Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Prue Cormie; Stephanie Lamb; Robert U Newton; Lani Valentine; Sandy McKiernan; Nigel Spry; David Joseph; Dennis R Taaffe; Christopher M Doran; Daniel A Galvão Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Simon M Rice; John L Oliffe; Mary T Kelly; Prue Cormie; Suzanne Chambers; John S Ogrodniczuk; David Kealy Journal: Am J Mens Health Date: 2018-06-29