Literature DB >> 25541372

'Would you eat cultured meat?': Consumers' reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom.

Wim Verbeke1, Afrodita Marcu2, Pieter Rutsaert3, Rui Gaspar4, Beate Seibt5, Dave Fletcher6, Julie Barnett7.   

Abstract

Cultured meat has evolved from an idea and concept into a reality with the August 2013 cultured hamburger tasting in London. Still, how consumers conceive cultured meat is largely an open question. This study addresses consumers' reactions and attitude formation towards cultured meat through analyzing focus group discussions and online deliberations with 179 meat consumers from Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Initial reactions when learning about cultured meat were underpinned by feelings of disgust and considerations of unnaturalness. Consumers saw few direct personal benefits but they were more open to perceiving global societal benefits relating to the environment and global food security. Both personal and societal risks were framed in terms of uncertainties about safety and health, and possible adverse societal consequences dealing with loss of farming and eating traditions and rural livelihoods. Further reflection pertained to skepticism about 'the inevitable' scientific progress, concern about risk governance and control, and need for regulation and proper labeling.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Attitude; Consumer; Cultured; In-vitro; Meat; Synthetic

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25541372     DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Meat Sci        ISSN: 0309-1740            Impact factor:   5.209


  22 in total

Review 1.  Conceptual evolution and scientific approaches about synthetic meat.

Authors:  Alice Munz Fernandes; Odilene de Souza Teixeira; Jean Philippe Palma Revillion; Ângela Rozane Leal de Souza
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.701

Review 2.  Techniques, challenges and future prospects for cell-based meat.

Authors:  Anmariya Benny; Kathiresan Pandi; Rituja Upadhyay
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 3.  Technology innovations for food security in Singapore: A case study of future food systems for an increasingly natural resource-scarce world.

Authors:  Wai Kit Mok; Yong Xing Tan; Wei Ning Chen
Journal:  Trends Food Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 12.563

4.  Analyzing the importance of attributes for Brazilian consumers to replace conventional beef with cultured meat.

Authors:  Gabriela Andrade de Oliveira; Carla Heloisa de Faria Domingues; João Augusto Rossi Borges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Edible Scaffolds Based on Non-Mammalian Biopolymers for Myoblast Growth.

Authors:  Javier Enrione; Jonny J Blaker; Donald I Brown; Caroline R Weinstein-Oppenheimer; Marzena Pepczynska; Yusser Olguín; Elizabeth Sánchez; Cristian A Acevedo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States.

Authors:  Matti Wilks; Clive J C Phillips
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Quality perception, purchase intention, and the impact of information on the evaluation of refined Pacific cupped oysters (Crassostrea gigas) by Dutch consumers.

Authors:  Jasper van Houcke; Themistokilis Altintzoglou; Jozef Linssen; Joop Luten
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.638

8.  Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in the In vitro Meat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger.

Authors:  Neil Stephens; Martin Ruivenkamp
Journal:  Sci Cult (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-08

Review 9.  Protein for Life: Review of Optimal Protein Intake, Sustainable Dietary Sources and the Effect on Appetite in Ageing Adults.

Authors:  Marta Lonnie; Emma Hooker; Jeffrey M Brunstrom; Bernard M Corfe; Mark A Green; Anthony W Watson; Elizabeth A Williams; Emma J Stevenson; Simon Penson; Alexandra M Johnstone
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  An empirical assessment of common or usual names to label cell-based seafood products.

Authors:  William K Hallman; William K Hallman
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.