| Literature DB >> 25541027 |
Yuki Nakajima1, Naoto Tomita2, Megumi Itabashi3, Kazuho Miyashita4, Reina Watanabe5, Takuya Miyazaki2, Takayoshi Tachibana2, Hirotaka Takasaki5, Rika Kawasaki4, Masatsugu Tanaka3, Chizuko Hashimoto6, Etsuko Yamazaki2, Jun Taguchi7, Katsumichi Fujimaki4, Rika Sakai5, Hiroyuki Fujita7, Shin Fujisawa3, Hiroshi Harano8, Shigeki Motomura5, Yoshiaki Ishigatsubo2.
Abstract
The prognostic implications of infra-diaphragmatic (InD) versus supra-diaphragmatic (SpD) primary lesions in limited-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains unknown. This retrospective study aimed to assess the prognostic impact of spD and InD lesions as well as presence of gastrointestinal (GI) involvements in adults with limited-stage DLBCL. We analyzed data from 178 patients with limited-stage DLBCL who were treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone therapy at 7 institutions of the Yokohama City University Hematology Group between 2003 and 2009. The median age was 63 years (range, 18-80 years). The primary sites were SpD in 109 patients, and InD in 69. No statistical differences in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) were observed between patients with SpD lesions and those with InD lesions. However, when patients with SpD lesions, InD lesions with (n=35), and without (n=34) GI involvement were compared, the presence of GI lesions was associated with favorable PFS. The multivariate analysis revealed that SpD or InD localization had no independent effect on PFS or OS, whereas the presence of GI lesions was correlated with favorable PFS (P=0.024, HR 0.09).Entities:
Keywords: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; Gastrointestinal involvement; Infra-diaphragmatic; Prognostic factor; Supra-diaphragmatic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25541027 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2014.11.030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leuk Res ISSN: 0145-2126 Impact factor: 3.156