Literature DB >> 25540852

On the track for an efficient detection of Escherichia coli in water: A review on PCR-based methods.

Diana Mendes Silva1, Lucília Domingues2.   

Abstract

Ensuring water safety is an ongoing challenge to public health providers. Assessing the presence of fecal contamination indicators in water is essential to protect public health from diseases caused by waterborne pathogens. For this purpose, the bacteria Escherichia coli has been used as the most reliable indicator of fecal contamination in water. The methods currently in use for monitoring the microbiological safety of water are based on culturing the microorganisms. However, these methods are not the desirable solution to prevent outbreaks as they provide the results with a considerable delay, lacking on specificity and sensitivity. Moreover, viable but non-culturable microorganisms, which may be present as a result of environmental stress or water treatment processes, are not detected by culture-based methods and, thus, may result in false-negative assessments of E. coli in water samples. These limitations may place public health at significant risk, leading to substantial monetary losses in health care and, additionally, in costs related with a reduced productivity in the area affected by the outbreak, and in costs supported by the water quality control departments involved. Molecular methods, particularly polymerase chain reaction-based methods, have been studied as an alternative technology to overcome the current limitations, as they offer the possibility to reduce the assay time, to improve the detection sensitivity and specificity, and to identify multiple targets and pathogens, including new or emerging strains. The variety of techniques and applications available for PCR-based methods has increased considerably and the costs involved have been substantially reduced, which together have contributed to the potential standardization of these techniques. However, they still require further refinement in order to be standardized and applied to the variety of environmental waters and their specific characteristics. The PCR-based methods under development for monitoring the presence of E. coli in water are here discussed. Special emphasis is given to methodologies that avoid pre-enrichment during the water sample preparation process so that the assay time is reduced and the required legislated sensitivity is achieved. The advantages and limitations of these methods are also reviewed, contributing to a more comprehensive overview toward a more conscious research in identifying E. coli in water.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Escherichia coli; PCR; Water quality; rtPCR

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25540852     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  13 in total

1.  Separation of Escherichia coli from natural samples for identification of sources and microcosm inoculation.

Authors:  Marcos Tavares Carneiro; Daniel Vidal Perez; Renato Castiglia Feitosa; Julio Cesar Wasserman
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 2.476

2.  Escherichia coli Capacity to Repopulate Microcosms Under Osmotic/U.V. Synergic Stress in Tropical Waters.

Authors:  Marcos T Carneiro; Daniel V Perez; Renato C Feitosa; Lorena G P Macena; Marize P Miagostovich; Julio C Wasserman
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Thermal Annealing Effect on Structural, Morphological, and Sensor Performance of PANI-Ag-Fe Based Electrochemical E. coli Sensor for Environmental Monitoring.

Authors:  Norshafadzila Mohammad Naim; H Abdullah; Akrajas Ali Umar; Aidil Abdul Hamid; Sahbudin Shaari
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-05-20

4.  Molecular tools for bathing water assessment in Europe: Balancing social science research with a rapidly developing environmental science evidence-base.

Authors:  David M Oliver; Nick D Hanley; Melanie van Niekerk; David Kay; A Louise Heathwaite; Sharyl J M Rabinovici; Julie L Kinzelman; Lora E Fleming; Jonathan Porter; Sabina Shaikh; Rob Fish; Sue Chilton; Julie Hewitt; Elaine Connolly; Andy Cummins; Klaus Glenk; Calum McPhail; Eric McRory; Alistair McVittie; Amanna Giles; Suzanne Roberts; Katherine Simpson; Dugald Tinch; Ted Thairs; Lisa M Avery; Andy J A Vinten; Bill D Watts; Richard S Quilliam
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 5.  Recent Progress in Lectin-Based Biosensors.

Authors:  Baozhen Wang; Jun-Ichi Anzai
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 6.  Long-Period Gratings and Microcavity In-Line Mach Zehnder Interferometers as Highly Sensitive Optical Fiber Platforms for Bacteria Sensing.

Authors:  Tinko Eftimov; Monika Janik; Marcin Koba; Mateusz Śmietana; Predrag Mikulic; Wojtek Bock
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Nucleic acids-based tools for ballast water surveillance, monitoring, and research.

Authors:  John A Darling; Raymond M Frederick
Journal:  J Sea Res       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.108

8.  Plasmonic bacteria on a nanoporous mirror via hydrodynamic trapping for rapid identification of waterborne pathogens.

Authors:  Keumrai Whang; Jong-Hwan Lee; Yonghee Shin; Wooju Lee; Young Wan Kim; Dongchoul Kim; Luke P Lee; Taewook Kang
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 17.782

Review 9.  Point-of-Care Strategies for Detection of Waterborne Pathogens.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar; Monika Nehra; Jyotsana Mehta; Neeraj Dilbaghi; Giovanna Marrazza; Ajeet Kaushik
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  DNA sequencing, genomes and genetic markers of microbes on fruits and vegetables.

Authors:  Youming Shen; Jiyun Nie; Lixue Kuang; Jianyi Zhang; Haifei Li
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.