Literature DB >> 25540674

Dynamics of nutrient uptake strategies: lessons from the tortoise and the hare.

Duncan N L Menge1, Ford Ballantyne2, Joshua S Weitz3.   

Abstract

Many autotrophs vary their allocation to nutrient uptake in response to environmental cues, yet the dynamics of this plasticity are largely unknown. Plasticity dynamics affect the extent of single versus multiple nutrient limitation and thus have implications for plant ecology and biogeochemical cycling. Here we use a model of two essential nutrients cycling through autotrophs and the environment to determine conditions under which different plastic or fixed nutrient uptake strategies are adaptive. Our model includes environment-independent costs of being plastic, environment-dependent costs proportional to the rate of plastic change, and costs of being mismatched to the environment, the last of which is experienced by both fixed and plastic types. In equilibrium environments, environment-independent costs of being plastic select for tortoise strategies-fixed or less plastic types-provided that they are sufficiently close to co-limitation. At intermediate levels of environmental fluctuation forced by periodic nutrient inputs, more hare-like plastic strategies prevail because they remain near co-limitation. However, the fastest is not necessarily the best. The most adaptive strategy is an intermediate level of plasticity that keeps pace with environmental fluctuations, but is not faster. At high levels of environmental fluctuation, the environment-dependent cost of changing rapidly to keep pace with the environment becomes prohibitive and tortoise strategies again dominate. The existence and location of these thresholds depend on plasticity costs and rate, which are largely unknown empirically. These results suggest that the expectations for single nutrient limitation versus co-limitation and therefore biogeochemical cycling and autotroph community dynamics depend on environmental heterogeneity and plasticity costs.Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12080-010-0110-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biogeochemistry; Co-limitation; Dynamics; Ecosystem theory; Nutrient limitation; Plasticity; Strategies

Year:  2011        PMID: 25540674      PMCID: PMC4270431          DOI: 10.1007/s12080-010-0110-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Ecol        ISSN: 1874-1738            Impact factor:   1.432


  23 in total

1.  Optimal allocation of building blocks between nutrient uptake systems in a microbe.

Authors:  Hugo A van den Berg; Yuri N Kiselev; Michael V Orlov
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Stochastic gene expression in fluctuating environments.

Authors:  Mukund Thattai; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in spatially structured environments: implications of intraspecific competition, plasticity costs and environmental characteristics.

Authors:  B Ernande; U Dieckmann
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  A model of flexible uptake of two essential resources.

Authors:  C A Klausmeier; E Litchman; S A Levin
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Cost-benefit theory and optimal design of gene regulation functions.

Authors:  Tomer Kalisky; Erez Dekel; Uri Alon
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation.

Authors:  Sonia E Sultan; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Facultative versus obligate nitrogen fixation strategies and their ecosystem consequences.

Authors:  Duncan N L Menge; Simon A Levin; Lars O Hedin
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment.

Authors:  D Cohen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Nitrogen fixation in different biogeochemical niches along a 120 000-year chronosequence in New Zealand.

Authors:  Duncan N L Menge; Lars O Hedin
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Environmental and genetic determinants of colony morphology in yeast.

Authors:  Joshua A Granek; Paul M Magwene
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  4 in total

1.  Dynamic model of flexible phytoplankton nutrient uptake.

Authors:  Juan A Bonachela; Michael Raghib; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Temporal phosphate gradients reveal diverse acclimation responses in phytoplankton phosphate uptake.

Authors:  Carlos Cáceres; Sofie Spatharis; Eirini Kaiserli; Evangelia Smeti; Hugh Flowers; Juan A Bonachela
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 3.  A conceptual framework for the evolution of ecological specialisation.

Authors:  Timothée Poisot; James D Bever; Adnane Nemri; Peter H Thrall; Michael E Hochberg
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Nitrogen and phosphorus limitation over long-term ecosystem development in terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors:  Duncan N L Menge; Lars O Hedin; Stephen W Pacala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.