Literature DB >> 25540299

Cost-sharing, physician utilization, and adverse selection among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic health conditions.

Geoffrey Hoffman1.   

Abstract

Pooled data from the 2007, 2009, and 2011/2012 California Health Interview Surveys were used to compare the number of self-reported annual physician visits among 36,808 Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 in insurance groups with differential cost-sharing. Adjusted for adverse selection and a set of health covariates, Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) only beneficiaries had similar physician utilization compared with HMO enrollees but fewer visits compared with those with supplemental (1.04, p = .001) and Medicaid (1.55, p = .003) coverage. FFS only beneficiaries in very good or excellent health had fewer visits compared with those of similar health status with supplemental (1.30, p = .001) or Medicaid coverage (2.15, p = .002). For subpopulations with several chronic conditions, FFS only beneficiaries also had fewer visits compared with beneficiaries with supplemental or Medicaid coverage. Observed differences in utilization may reflect efficient and necessary physician utilization among those with chronic health needs.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicaid/Medicare; access to and utilization of services; economics; health care policy; health insurance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25540299      PMCID: PMC4384646          DOI: 10.1177/1077558714563169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  41 in total

1.  Health status and the demand for health. Results on price elasticities.

Authors:  G J Wedig
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Reforming beneficiary cost sharing to improve Medicare performance.

Authors:  Stephen Zuckerman; Baoping Shang; Timothy Waidmann
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  Cost-sharing for emergency care and unfavorable clinical events: findings from the safety and financial ramifications of ED copayments study.

Authors:  John Hsu; Mary Price; Richard Brand; G Thomas Ray; Bruce Fireman; Joseph P Newhouse; Joseph V Selby
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  What does the RAND Health Insurance Experiment tell us about the impact of patient cost sharing on health outcomes?

Authors:  Michael E Chernew; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Exploring nonresponse bias in a health survey using neighborhood characteristics.

Authors:  Sunghee Lee; E Richard Brown; David Grant; Thomas R Belin; J Michael Brick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Improving care for dual eligibles through innovations in financing.

Authors:  Lisa Clemans-Cope; Timothy Waidmann
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Using shared savings to foster coordinated care for dual eligibles.

Authors:  Richard G Frank
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Medicare coverage, supplemental insurance, and the use of mammography by older women.

Authors:  J Blustein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Concordance between survey report of Medicaid enrollment and linked Medicaid administrative records in two national studies.

Authors:  Lisa B Mirel; Alan E Simon; Cordell Golden; Catherine R Duran; Kenneth C Schoendorf
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2014-01-06

10.  Effects of increased patient cost sharing on socioeconomic disparities in health care.

Authors:  Michael Chernew; Teresa B Gibson; Kristina Yu-Isenberg; Michael C Sokol; Allison B Rosen; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.