Literature DB >> 25539428

Frequency of radiologic procedures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Marcia Venegas-Pont1, John M Davis, Cynthia S Crowson, Sherine E Gabriel, Eric L Matteson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) undergo radiologic investigations for disease and comorbidity evaluation. The actual use of radiologic imaging in RA is unknown.
METHODS: Using the Rochester Epidemiology Project medical record linkage system, adult patients from previously assembled population-based cohorts of Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents who fulfilled the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA in 1988 to 2007 and comparator subjects without RA of similar age and gender were studied. Data on all radiologic procedures performed were collected.
RESULTS: The study included 650 patients with RA and 650 patients without RA. Patients with RA had significantly more radiographs of the chest (rate ratio [RR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-31.38), upper extremity (RR, 2.97; 95% CI, 2.80-83.17), lower extremity (RR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.94-102.16), spine (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.35-41.59), and hip, pelvis, or sacroiliac joints (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03-11.26), as well as bone radionuclide (RR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.50-52.44) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry imaging (RR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.59-61.98) compared with patients without RA. Among patients with RA, having a positive rheumatoid factor was associated with an increased likelihood of undergoing radiologic procedures (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-11.07). Women with RA underwent more imaging procedures than men (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.16-21.23).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA undergo more radiologic procedures than patients without RA. Among patients with RA, women and patients with a positive rheumatoid factor have more radiologic procedures. The utilization of radiography is likely a reflection of overall disease burden. Despite some guidelines, routine hand wrist radiographs were not obtained with regularity; "overuse" is unlikely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25539428      PMCID: PMC4371515          DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 1076-1608            Impact factor:   3.517


  10 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2002 Update.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-02

2.  2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative.

Authors:  Daniel Aletaha; Tuhina Neogi; Alan J Silman; Julia Funovits; David T Felson; Clifton O Bingham; Neal S Birnbaum; Gerd R Burmester; Vivian P Bykerk; Marc D Cohen; Bernard Combe; Karen H Costenbader; Maxime Dougados; Paul Emery; Gianfranco Ferraccioli; Johanna M W Hazes; Kathryn Hobbs; Tom W J Huizinga; Arthur Kavanaugh; Jonathan Kay; Tore K Kvien; Timothy Laing; Philip Mease; Henri A Ménard; Larry W Moreland; Raymond L Naden; Theodore Pincus; Josef S Smolen; Ewa Stanislawska-Biernat; Deborah Symmons; Paul P Tak; Katherine S Upchurch; Jirí Vencovský; Frederick Wolfe; Gillian Hawker
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2010-09

3.  Orthopedic surgery among patients with rheumatoid arthritis 1980-2007: a population-based study focused on surgery rates, sex, and mortality.

Authors:  Courtney A Shourt; Cynthia S Crowson; Sherine E Gabriel; Eric L Matteson
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging in early inflammatory arthritis: what is its role?

Authors:  F M McQueen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  F C Arnett; S M Edworthy; D A Bloch; D J McShane; J F Fries; N S Cooper; L A Healey; S R Kaplan; M H Liang; H S Luthra
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1988-03

6.  Noncardiac vascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis: increase in venous thromboembolic events?

Authors:  A Kirstin Bacani; Sherine E Gabriel; Cynthia S Crowson; John A Heit; Eric L Matteson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-01

7.  Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in rheumatoid arthritis joint damage of the Sharp/van der Heijde and Larsen/Scott scoring methods by clinical experts and comparison with the smallest detectable difference.

Authors:  Karin Bruynesteyn; Désirée van der Heijde; Maarten Boers; Ariane Saudan; Paul Peloso; Harold Paulus; Harry Houben; Bridget Griffiths; John Edmonds; Barry Bresnihan; Annelies Boonen; Sjef van der Linden
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-04

Review 8.  Ultrasound versus conventional radiography in the assessment of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Marwin Gutierrez; Marina Carotti
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 4.473

9.  Biannual radiographic assessments of hands and feet in a three-year prospective followup of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D M van der Heijde; M A van Leeuwen; P L van Riel; A M Koster; M A van 't Hof; M H van Rijswijk; L B van de Putte
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1992-01

Review 10.  What is MRI bone oedema in rheumatoid arthritis and why does it matter?

Authors:  Fiona M McQueen; Benedikt Ostendorf
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.156

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Variations in Radiographic Procedure Use for Medicare Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Gabriela Schmajuk; Chris Tonner; Laura Trupin; Jinoos Yazdany
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 2.  Osteoporosis Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, and Screening in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Giovanni Adami; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.592

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.