Literature DB >> 25539308

A critical evaluation of long-term aesthetic outcomes of fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling in nonsyndromic unicoronal craniosynostosis.

Jesse A Taylor1, J Thomas Paliga, Ari M Wes, Youssef Tahiri, Jesse A Goldstein, Linton A Whitaker, Scott P Bartlett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study reports long-term aesthetic outcomes with fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling in treating unicoronal synostosis over a 35-year period.
METHODS: Retrospective review was performed on patients with isolated unicoronal synostosis from 1977 to 2012. Demographic, preoperative phenotypic, and long-term aesthetic outcomes data were analyzed with chi-squared and Fisher's exact test for categorical data and Wilcoxon rank-sum and Kruskal-Wallis rank for continuous data.
RESULTS: A total of 238 patients were treated; 207 met inclusion criteria. None underwent secondary intervention for intracranial pressure. At definitive intervention, there 96 (55 percent) Whitaker class I patients, 11 (6 percent) class II, 62 (35 percent) class III, and six (3 percent) class IV. Nasal root deviation and occipital bossing each conferred an increased risk of Whitaker class III/IV [OR, 4.4 (1.4 to 13.9), p = 0.011; OR, 2.6 (1.0 to 6.8), p = 0.049]. Patients who underwent bilateral cranial vault remodeling with extended unilateral bandeau were less likely Whitaker class III/IV at latest follow-up compared with those undergoing strictly unilateral procedures [OR, 0.2 (0.1 to 0.7), p = 0.011]. Overcorrection resulted in decreased risk of temporal hollowing [OR, 0.3 (0.1 to 1.0), p = 0.05]. Patients with 5 years or more of follow-up were more likely to develop supraorbital retrusion [OR, 7.2 (2.2 to 23.4), p = 0.001] and temporal hollowing [OR, 3.7 (1.5 to 9.6), p = 0.006] and have Whitaker class III/IV outcomes [OR, 4.9 (1.8 to 12.8), p = 0.001].
CONCLUSION: Traditional fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling appears to mitigate risk of intracranial pressure but may lead to aesthetic shortcomings as patients mature, namely fronto-orbital retrusion and temporal hollowing. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25539308     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  8 in total

1.  The Temporal Region in Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis: Fronto-orbital Advancement Versus Endoscopy-Assisted Strip Craniectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin Masserano; Albert S Woo; Gary B Skolnick; Sybill D Naidoo; Mark R Proctor; Matthew D Smyth; Kamlesh B Patel
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2017-12-14

Review 2.  Short- and Long-Term Outcomes by Procedure Type for Nonsagittal Single-Suture Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Katelyn G Bennett; Geoffrey E Hespe; Christian J Vercler; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Skeletal Deformity in Patients With Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis: Perceptions of the General Public.

Authors:  Emilie Robertson; Peter Kwan; Gorman Louie; Pierre Boulanger; Daniel Aalto
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-03-25

Review 4.  Review of Past Reports and Current Concepts of Surgical Management for Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Shigeo Kyutoku; Takayuki Inagaki
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Surgical Correction of Unicoronal Craniosynostosis with Frontal Bone Symmetrization and Staggered Osteotomies.

Authors:  Seyed Esmail Hassanpour; Masoumeh Abbasnezhad; Hamidreza Alizadeh Otaghvar; Adnan Tizmaghz
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2018-10-29

6.  Effectiveness of Automatic Planning of Fronto-orbital Advancement for the Surgical Correction of Metopic Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  David García-Mato; Antonio R Porras; Santiago Ochandiano; Gary F Rogers; Roberto García-Leal; José I Salmerón; Javier Pascau; Marius George Linguraru
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-11-11

7.  The Directive Growth Approach for Nonsyndromic, Unicoronal Craniosynostosis: Patient and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Robert J Mann; Matthew P Fahrenkopf; Michael Burton; John Girotto; John Polley
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Subjective Assessment of Head and Facial Appearance in Children with Craniosynostoses after Surgical Treatment.

Authors:  Dawid Larysz; Elżbieta Nieroba
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.