Jian Ma1, Yong-Qing Huang, Caroline Yao, Shu-Qing Ma, Tian Meng, Min Ma, Gui-Hua Su, Kun Zhai, Zhong-Wei Zhou, Jin-Fang Zhu, Bing Shi. 1. Chengdu and Yinchuan, People's Republic of China; and Los Angeles, Calif. From the Department of Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China School/Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University; the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, and the Department of Obstetrics, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia Province; and the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nonsyndromic oral clefts are complex in cause and have multiple genetic and environmental risk factors. This retrospective, questionnaire-based, case-control study investigated the relationship between oral clefts and parental mental and physical health and social support. METHODS: Three hundred forty-seven parents of children with nonsyndromic oral clefts and 420 controls were included. Maternal and paternal health during the first trimester was assessed using interviews and questionnaires modeled from the Cornell Medical Index and the Social Support Rating Scale. Case-control analyses were performed using t tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Parental age, household income, and subsisting on farming were significantly different for cases and controls. The Cornell Medical Index for cases was significantly worse compared with controls for physical and psychological health. Logistic regression showed that nine factors were significantly associated with oral clefts: paternal respiratory health (OR, 1.56; p = 0.03), maternal gastrointestinal health (OR, 1.71; p < 0.01), maternal musculoskeletal health (OR, 1.50; p < 0.01), paternal nervous system health (OR, 2.82; p < 0.01), maternal frequency of illness (OR, 2.21; p = 0.01), maternal diseases (OR, 2.44; p < 0.01), maternal health habits (OR, 1.73; p < 0.01), paternal feelings of inadequacy (OR, 2.28; p = 0.03), and maternal anger (OR, 2.28; p < 0.01) in the first trimester. Weaker social support from the community was associated with oral clefts (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Maternal and paternal health and social support may affect a family's risk of having a child with a cleft. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
BACKGROUND:Nonsyndromic oral clefts are complex in cause and have multiple genetic and environmental risk factors. This retrospective, questionnaire-based, case-control study investigated the relationship between oral clefts and parental mental and physical health and social support. METHODS: Three hundred forty-seven parents of children with nonsyndromic oral clefts and 420 controls were included. Maternal and paternal health during the first trimester was assessed using interviews and questionnaires modeled from the Cornell Medical Index and the Social Support Rating Scale. Case-control analyses were performed using t tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Parental age, household income, and subsisting on farming were significantly different for cases and controls. The Cornell Medical Index for cases was significantly worse compared with controls for physical and psychological health. Logistic regression showed that nine factors were significantly associated with oral clefts: paternal respiratory health (OR, 1.56; p = 0.03), maternal gastrointestinal health (OR, 1.71; p < 0.01), maternal musculoskeletal health (OR, 1.50; p < 0.01), paternal nervous system health (OR, 2.82; p < 0.01), maternal frequency of illness (OR, 2.21; p = 0.01), maternal diseases (OR, 2.44; p < 0.01), maternal health habits (OR, 1.73; p < 0.01), paternal feelings of inadequacy (OR, 2.28; p = 0.03), and maternal anger (OR, 2.28; p < 0.01) in the first trimester. Weaker social support from the community was associated with oral clefts (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Maternal and paternal health and social support may affect a family's risk of having a child with a cleft. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.