Literature DB >> 25539232

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with retropharyngeal lymph node metastases: a minimum axial diameter of 6 mm is a more accurate prognostic predictor than 5 mm.

Yi-Zhuo Li1, Chuan-Miao Xie, Yao-Pan Wu, Chun-Yan Cui, Zi-Lin Huang, Ci-Yong Lu, Pei-Hong Wu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The criteria for the diagnosis of metastatic retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RLNs) have not yet been resolved and are not included in the current edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (seventh edition) for the staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The aim of this study was to use MRI to identify an RLN size criterion that can accurately predict prognosis in patients with NPC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight hundred seventeen patients with newly diagnosed localized NPC were identified. All of the patients underwent MRI before treatment with definitive radiation therapy. All the MRI studies and medical records were reviewed retrospectively. Overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and local relapse-free survival (LRFS) were assessed using SPSS software (version 17.0).
RESULTS: RLN size cutoffs of ≥ 5 mm and of ≥ 6 mm were used. There was no significant difference in OS (p = 0.216), DMFS (p = 0.081), or LRFS (p = 0.067) in patients with RLNs ≥ 5 mm and in those with RLNs < 5 mm. When 6 mm was used as a size cutoff, significant differences in OS (p = 0.000) and DMFS (p = 0.001) were identified; there was no significant difference observed for LRFS (p = 0.380).
CONCLUSION: A minimum axial RLN diameter of 6 mm was a more accurate prognostic predictor in NPC patients with RLN metastases than 5 mm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; prognostic value; retropharyngeal lymph node; tumor staging

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25539232     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.12936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  5 in total

1.  Can Parameters Other than Minimal Axial Diameter in MRI and PET/CT Further Improve Diagnostic Accuracy for Equivocal Retropharyngeal Lymph Nodes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma?

Authors:  Yu-Wen Wang; Chin-Shun Wu; Guo-Yi Zhang; Chih-Han Chang; Kuo-Sheng Cheng; Wei-Jen Yao; Yu-Kang Chang; Tsair-Wei Chien; Li-Ching Lin; Keng-Ren Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The value of CT, MRI, and PET-CT in detecting retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Kim; Kyu Young Choi; Sang-Hyo Lee; Dong Jin Lee; Bum Jung Park; Dae Young Yoon; Young-Soo Rho
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  The diagnostic value of 1.5-T diffusion-weighted MR imaging in detecting 5 to 10 mm metastatic cervical lymph nodes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Guan Qiao Jin; Jun Yang; Li Dong Liu; Dan Ke Su; Duo Ping Wang; Sheng Fa Zhao; Zhi Ling Liao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Detection of Retropharyngeal Lymph Node Metastases in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Jingwen Luo; Xia He; Chenjing Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Verification of the Efficacy of New Diagnostic Criteria for Retropharyngeal Nodes in a Cohort of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Dom-Gene Tu; Hsuan-Yu Chen; Wei-Jen Yao; Yu-Sheng Hung; Yu-Kang Chang; Chih-Han Chang; Yu-Wen Wang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.