Syed Nabeel Zafar1, Adil A Shah, Zain G Hashmi, David T Efron, Elliott R Haut, Eric B Schneider, Diane Schwartz, Catherine G Velopulos, Edward E Cornwell, Adil H Haider. 1. From the Department of Surgery (S.N.Z., E.E.C.), Howard University Hospital, Washington District of Columbia; Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research (A.A.S., D.T.E., E.R.H., E.B.S., D.S., C.G.V.), Center for Surgery and Public Health Brigham Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health (A.H.H.), Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute; and Department of Surgery (Z.G.H.), Sinai Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous analyses demonstrate teaching hospitals to have worse outcomes raising concerns for quality of care. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals for emergency surgical conditions in a national sample. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2005-2011) was queried for patients with emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions as determined by the American Association for Surgery of Trauma. Outcomes of in-hospital mortality, major complications, length of stay (LOS) and hospital cost were compared between patients presenting to teaching versus nonteaching hospitals. Propensity scores were used to match both groups on demographics, clinical diagnosis, comorbidities, and disease severity. Multivariate regression analyses were performed further adjusting for hospital-level factors including EGS volume. Small effect estimates were further tested using standardized differences. RESULTS: A total of 3,707,465 patients from 3,163 centers were included. A majority of patients (59%) (n = 2,187,107) were treated at nonteaching hospitals. After propensity score matching and adjustment, teaching hospitals had a slightly higher odds likelihood of mortality (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.06), slightly lower rate of major complications (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-0.99), slightly decreased LOS (5.03 days [4.98-5.09] vs. 5.22 days [5.16-5.29]), and slightly higher hospital costs [$12,846 [$12,827-$12,865] vs. $12,304 [12,290-12,318]). Although these differences were statistically significant at p < 0.05, the absolute difference was very small. Further testing of these effect estimates using standardized differences revealed an insignificant difference of 0.5% for mortality, 0.4% for major complications, 0.2% for LOS, and 3.1% for hospital cost. CONCLUSION: National estimates of outcomes for EGS conditions demonstrate comparable results between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Concerns regarding quality of care and higher costs at teaching hospitals may be unfounded. Further research to test for differences by specific EGS conditions, operative management, and hospital costs are warranted.
BACKGROUND: Previous analyses demonstrate teaching hospitals to have worse outcomes raising concerns for quality of care. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals for emergency surgical conditions in a national sample. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2005-2011) was queried for patients with emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions as determined by the American Association for Surgery of Trauma. Outcomes of in-hospital mortality, major complications, length of stay (LOS) and hospital cost were compared between patients presenting to teaching versus nonteaching hospitals. Propensity scores were used to match both groups on demographics, clinical diagnosis, comorbidities, and disease severity. Multivariate regression analyses were performed further adjusting for hospital-level factors including EGS volume. Small effect estimates were further tested using standardized differences. RESULTS: A total of 3,707,465 patients from 3,163 centers were included. A majority of patients (59%) (n = 2,187,107) were treated at nonteaching hospitals. After propensity score matching and adjustment, teaching hospitals had a slightly higher odds likelihood of mortality (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.06), slightly lower rate of major complications (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-0.99), slightly decreased LOS (5.03 days [4.98-5.09] vs. 5.22 days [5.16-5.29]), and slightly higher hospital costs [$12,846 [$12,827-$12,865] vs. $12,304 [12,290-12,318]). Although these differences were statistically significant at p < 0.05, the absolute difference was very small. Further testing of these effect estimates using standardized differences revealed an insignificant difference of 0.5% for mortality, 0.4% for major complications, 0.2% for LOS, and 3.1% for hospital cost. CONCLUSION: National estimates of outcomes for EGS conditions demonstrate comparable results between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Concerns regarding quality of care and higher costs at teaching hospitals may be unfounded. Further research to test for differences by specific EGS conditions, operative management, and hospital costs are warranted.
Authors: Theunis J van Zyl; Patrick B Murphy; Laura Allen; Neil G Parry; Ken Leslie; Kelly N Vogt Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Richard S Hoehn; Dennis J Hanseman; Alex L Chang; Megan C Daly; Audrey E Ertel; Daniel E Abbott; Shimul A Shah; Ian M Paquette Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Cheryl K Zogg; Wei Jiang; Taylor D Ottesen; Shahid Shafi; Kevin Schuster; Robert Becher; Kimberly A Davis; Adil H Haider Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Sandra R DiBrito; Mary Grace Bowring; Courtenay M Holscher; Christine E Haugen; Sarah V Rasmussen; Mark D Duncan; David T Efron; Kent Stevens; Dorry L Segev; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Elliott R Haut Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Theunis J van Zyl; Patrick B Murphy; Laura Allen; Neil G Parry; Ken Leslie; Kelly N Vogt Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 2.089