Literature DB >> 2553879

Combination chemotherapy versus single agents followed by combination chemotherapy in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

P D Bonomi1, D M Finkelstein, J C Ruckdeschel, R H Blum, M D Green, B Mason, R Hahn, D C Tormey, J Harris, R Comis.   

Abstract

During the last decade, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) has studied a series of combination chemotherapy regimens in metastatic (stage IV) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In January 1984, the ECOG activated a randomized study, EST 1583, which concluded the evaluation of combination regimens in phase III trials and initiated the evaluation of single agents exclusively in previously untreated patients. The treatment regimens in EST 1583 consisted of: (1) mitomycin, vinblastine, and cisplatin (MVP); (2) vinblastine and cisplatin (VP); (3) MVP alternating with the regimen cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and procarbazine (CAMP); (4) carboplatin followed by the MVP regimen at the time of progression; and (5) iproplatin followed by MVP at the time of progression. From January 1984 to July 1985, 743 patients were entered on this trial and 699 fulfilled the eligibility requirements. The following objective response rates (complete plus partial remissions) were observed: first-line MVP, 20%; VP, 13%; MVP/CAMP, 13%; carboplatin, 9%; iproplatin, 6%; and second-line MVP, 6%. First-line MVP produced a significantly higher response rate than the other treatments (P = .03) adjusted for prognostic variables. Using analyses that were adjusted for prognostic covariates, survival for patients treated on a given regimen was compared with survival for all remaining patients. These analyses showed that treatment with carboplatin was associated with longer survival (median survival time, 31.7 weeks; P = .008) while initial treatment with MVP was associated with a trend for shorter survival (median survival time, 22.7 weeks; P = .09). It should be noted that none of these regimens appear to have produced a clinically meaningful prolongation of survival. Similar analyses evaluating time to progression disclosed that carboplatin-treated patients had a significantly longer time to progression (median time to progression, 29 weeks) than all remaining patients (P = .01). Life-threatening and lethal toxicities (toxicity grades 4 and 5) were greater on the combination regimens than on the single agents (P less than .0001). Based on these results, current group-wide ECOG trials in stage IV NSCLC consist of randomized phase II trials evaluating single agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2553879     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.11.1602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  36 in total

Review 1.  Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C J Sweeney; A B Sandler
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Phase I study of paclitaxel on a 3-hour schedule followed by carboplatin in untreated patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  E K Rowinsky; W A Flood; S E Sartorius; K M Bowling; D S Ettinger
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 3.  Advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: the emerging role of docetaxel.

Authors:  C J Langer
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Analysis of thrombocytopenia due to carboplatin combined with etoposide in elderly patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  K Shibata; Y Nakatsumi; K Kasahara; T Bando; M Fujimura; T Matsuda
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Etoposide in patients with previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I study.

Authors:  N Niederle; J Ostermann; W Achterrath; L Lenaz; C G Schmidt
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Phase II study of mitomycin C, etoposide and vindesine in metastatic stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C Gridelli; R Pepe; S Palmeri; S Iacobelli; M Gentile; V Gebbia; C Garufi; G Airoma; G Palmieri; A Russo
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 7.  50 Years of progress in the systemic therapy of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Heather Wakelee; Karen Kelly; Martin J Edelman
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2014

8.  Combination chemotherapy in the treatment of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R M Rutherford; T Azher; J J Gilmartin
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Efficacy of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for chemotherapy-induced leukopenia in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  K Eguchi; J Kabe; S Kudo; K Mano; H Morinari; K Nakada; K Noda; Y Saito; T Tanaka; T Uzawa
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 10.  Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a perspective on the recent advances and the experience with gefitinib.

Authors:  A Onn; M Tsuboi; N Thatcher
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.