Literature DB >> 25538158

Pro: Should we move to more frequent haemodialysis schedules?

Panagiotis I Georgianos1, Pantelis A Sarafidis2.   

Abstract

Most end-stage renal disease patients on maintenance haemodialysis follow the typical schedule of three sessions per week, and thus remain outside dialysis for two short intervals (∼2 days in duration) and for a longer interval (∼3 days) at the end of each week. This pattern was historically enforced more due to calendar logistics and less due to factors related to health and disease. Therefore, it is long hypothesized that the intermittent nature of haemodialysis and the consequent shifts and fluctuations in volume status and metabolic parameters during the dialysis-free periods may pre-dispose patients to several complications. Recent large-scale observational studies in haemodialysis patients link the first week-day (including the last hours of the long interval and the subsequent dialysis session) with increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Previous observational studies support that enhanced-frequency home haemodialysis is associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality, while randomized studies suggest that short-daily or alternate-day in-centre haemodialysis offer improvements in left ventricular hypertrophy, blood pressure, phosphorous homeostasis and other intermediate end points when compared with conventional thrice-weekly in-centre haemodialysis. This article summarizes available evidence relating long inter-dialytic intervals with elevated cardiovascular risk, potential mechanisms for this association and the main benefits of more frequent dialytic modalities.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alternate-day dialysis; frequent dialysis; long inter-dialytic interval; morbidity; mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25538158     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfu381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  5 in total

1.  Ambulatory aortic blood pressure, wave reflections and pulse wave velocity are elevated during the third in comparison to the second interdialytic day of the long interval in chronic haemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Georgios Koutroumbas; Panagiotis I Georgianos; Pantelis A Sarafidis; Athanase Protogerou; Antonios Karpetas; Pantelis Vakianis; Vassilios Raptis; Vassilios Liakopoulos; Stylianos Panagoutsos; Christos Syrganis; Ploumis Passadakis
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 2.  The Ebb and Flow of Echocardiographic Cardiac Function Parameters in Relationship to Hemodialysis Treatment in Patients with ESRD.

Authors:  Charalampos Loutradis; Pantelis A Sarafidis; Christodoulos E Papadopoulos; Aikaterini Papagianni; Carmine Zoccali
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  A Randomized, Single-Blind, Crossover Trial of Recovery Time in High-Flux Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  James R Smith; Norica Zimmer; Elizabeth Bell; Bernard G Francq; Alex McConnachie; Robert Mactier
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Impact of parathyroidectomy on left ventricular function in end stage renal disease patients.

Authors:  Shaohua Chen; Kaixiang Sheng; Ying Shen; Hua Jiang; Xin Lei; Lihui Qu; Chunping Xu; Jianghua Chen; Ping Zhang
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 5.  Volume overload in hemodialysis: diagnosis, cardiovascular consequences, and management.

Authors:  Charalampos Loutradis; Pantelis A Sarafidis; Charles J Ferro; Carmine Zoccali
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 5.992

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.