Literature DB >> 25538099

Overdominance effect of the bovine ghrelin receptor (GHSR1a)-DelR242 locus on growth in Japanese Shorthorn weaner bulls: heterozygote advantage in bull selection and molecular mechanisms.

Masanori Komatsu1, Yoichi Sato2, Tatsuki Negami3, Tohru Terada4, Osamu Sasaki5, Jumpei Yasuda2, Aisaku Arakawa6, Chikara Yoshida2, Hideaki Takahashi5, Aduli E O Malau-Aduli7, Keiichi Suzuki8, Kentaro Shimizu4.   

Abstract

Ghrelin and the ghrelin receptor (GHSR1a) are involved in growth hormone secretion, food intake, and several other important functions. Ghrelin acts on GHSR1a and induces signal transduction via the Gαq subunit. In our previous study, we identified the DelR242 (3R) allele, a truncated 3-arginine residue (3R) [major type: 4 arginine residues (4R)] of the third intracellular loop of GHSR1a, with a high frequency in Japanese Shorthorn bulls (0.43) but with a low frequency in other cattle breeds (0.00-0.09). To further investigate the reasons for the higher frequency of the 3R allele, we performed several experiments. In this study, we found a significant sex difference in the frequency of the 3R allele. Statistical analysis revealed a significant overdominance effect of the DelR242 locus on growth in Japanese Shorthorn weaner bulls. However, additive/dominance/overdominance effects of the 3R allele on carcass traits in adult steers and dams were not significant. The mode of the overdominance effect was estimated to be solely controlled by the single DelR242 locus without any other linked loci using linkage disequilibrium analysis in GHSR1a. These results indicated that 4R/3R heterozygotes had a selective advantage in weaner bulls because of their higher average daily gain than homozygotes. We discussed possible molecular mechanisms involved in the overdominance effect of the DelR242 locus on these traits in weaner bulls using a structural model of the complex consisting of a GHSR1a dimer and Gαq.
Copyright © 2015 Komatsu et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DelR242; cattle; ghrelin receptor (GHSR1a); growth; overdominance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25538099      PMCID: PMC4321035          DOI: 10.1534/g3.114.016105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)        ISSN: 2160-1836            Impact factor:   3.154


Japanese Shorthorn cattle were developed by crossbreeding indigenous (Nanbu-gyu) and Shorthorn (meat-type and/or dairy-type) cattle imported from the United States, England, Canada, and Australia in the Meiji to Showa eras in the northern Tohoku district (consisting of Iwate, Aomori, and Akita prefectures) and Hokkaido Island. Japanese Shorthorn cattle are superior in terms of hardiness in a cold climate and grazing ability; however, they show less uniformity in body weight (BW) and body conformation than Japanese Black cattle because of their high genetic diversity and unique crossbreeding histories. Natural mating on regional public ranches (standard herd: 1 sire and 50 dams) is a conventional practice (Mizuma and Sasaki 1974; Japanese Shorthorn Registry Association 1980). The growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHSR1a), a ghrelin receptor, is a typical G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) with seven transmembrane domains, and GHSR1a mRNA is highly expressed in the hypothalamus and anterior pituitary gland (Howard ). Both ghrelin, the endogenous ligand of GHSR1a, and GHSR1a itself are involved in growth hormone (GH) secretion, appetite regulation, taste bud signaling, and several other important functions (Sun ; Kojima and Kangawa 2005; Cruz and Smith 2008; Shin ; Albarran-Zeckler ). In the study of nucleotide polymorphisms of bovine GHSR1a, we identified the DelR242 (3R) allele, a truncated 3-arginine residue (3R) [major type: 4-arginine residue (4R)] of the third intracellular loop 3 (ICL3) of the GHSR1a protein and showed that it occurred with high frequency (0.43) in Japanese Shorthorn bulls and with low frequency (0.09) in Holstein–Friesian cattle. However, this allele was never found in Japanese Black or Mishima Island cattle (Komatsu ). The 3R is a fundamental type of the GHSR1a protein in mice, rats, and Chinese hamsters, whereas the 4R is found in humans and pigs (Supporting Information, Figure S1). In humans, two missense mutations (p.R237W and p.D246A) adjacent to the 4R region of ICL3 of the GHSR1a protein have been reported in short-stature family lines (Pantel ; Inoue ). These GHSR1a mutations displayed a partial loss of constitutive activity of the GHSR1a receptor. We hypothesized that DelR242 affects growth and carcass traits (Komatsu ). We further investigated the causal trigger for the higher frequency of the 3R allele of GHSR1a observed in Japanese Shorthorn cattle.

Materials and Methods

Animals and data collection

All livestock handling and cattle management procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines for animal care of the NARO Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science. Genomic DNA was extracted from leukocytes using the standard phenol extraction protocol. Fragment analysis and sequencing of the DelR242 locus, the 5′UTR microsatellite [5′UTR-(TG)], the intron 1 microsatellite [MS(GTTT)], and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the nt-7(C > A), nt70(C > G), nt456(G > A), nt580(G > A), and nt667(C > T) loci were performed as previously described (Table S1) (Komatsu ). The nt70(C > G), nt580(G > A), and nt667(C > T) loci in exon 1 and the intron 1 microsatellite [MS(GTTT)] were fixed for the homozygotes [C/C, G/G, C/C, and (GTTT), respectively] in 95 sires. To compare allele and haplotype frequencies of the DelR242, 5′UTR-(TG), nt-7(C > A), and nt456(G > A) loci in sires and dams and to perform an association study between these loci and directly tested traits of weaner bulls or carcass traits of shipped half sibs, we collected a total of 661 genomic DNA samples [121 for sires and 540 for shipped half sibs sired by 17 bulls (210 dams and 330 steers)]. Of 121 weaner bulls, 26 individuals had only DelR242 and nt-7(C > A) genotype data. Of 540 shipped half sibs, 3 individuals were excluded from analysis because of insufficient growth. The 540 half sibs were not randomly selected from the shipped steer and dam population because we planned to collect as many 3R/3R individuals as possible for the association study using 540 half sibs sired by 14 4R/3R heterozygotes and 3 3R/3R homozygotes. In addition, the frequencies of the 3R allele of the DelR242 locus in 17 sires and 540 half sibs were significantly higher than those in 95 sires (Table S2). We estimated the allele or haplotype frequency in the dam population by removing the sire allele or haplotype from the 540 half sib genotypes or haplotype combinations. Two experiments were performed for the association study. In Experiment 1 (Exp. 1), data of 121 weaner bulls in a direct-testing program in Iwate Prefecture from 1995 to 2009 (except for 1998) were analyzed. The calves were born between February and May in their respective farmers’ feedlots (birth years: 1995–2009) and grazed on regional public ranches with their dams from May to the end of September. Unfortunately, the birth weights of calves were not recorded. Preliminary selection on the basis of their body shape and conformation measurements (BSCMs) was performed at 4–5 months of age (Figure S3). The selected weaner bulls aged 6–7 months were transported to the direct testing station at the Animal Industry Research Institute, Iwate Agricultural Research Center (IARC). They were fed concentrate (6.3% of BW0.75/d, recalculated every 2 wk). They also had ad libitum access to roughage (timothy-grass hay) with an allowance of 42 d for adjustment and acclimatization, followed by the standard 140 d of direct testing prior to slaughter. The average age at the start of direct testing was 245.1 ± 20.6 d (mean ± SD). Routine management of the animals involved fortnightly recording of BW and BSCM traits at the start and end of direct testing [11 BSCM traits: withers height (WH); hip height (HH); body length (BL); chest depth (CD); chest width (CW); rump length (RL); hip width (HW); thurl width (TW); pin bone width (PBW); chest girth (CG); cannon circumference (CC)] (Figure S3). Other data included daily concentrate and roughage intakes, average daily gain (ADG) for the direct-testing period, total subcutaneous fat thickness at 8 points (8SFT), and total weight of concentrate and roughage intakes and concentrate and roughage weights per kg of BW gain (CONC_1 and ROUGH_1, respectively). Relative percentages (%) of roughage (ROUGH) were calculated from the daily recorded concentration and roughage intakes ([roughage]/[roughage + concentration]) during the direct-testing period. BWs observed at selection (BW_Sel) (average: 187 d of age), at the start (BW_S; average: 246 d of age), and at the end (BW_E; average: 386 d of age) of direct testing were used. The 180-d and 365-d adjusted BWs (180BW and 365BW, respectively) were estimated using simple linear regression with BW_Sel, BW_S, and BW_E as independent variables. Of 121 weaner bulls, 27 individuals (from 1995 to 2001) had data only for ADG, BW_S, BW_E, 180BW, 365BW, 8SFT, CONC_1, ROUGH_1, and ROUGH. In Experiment 2 (Exp. 2), we used 537 half sibs (209 dams and 328 steers) sired by 17 bulls (the DelR242 genotype: 14 4R/3Rs and 3 3R/3Rs). These half sibs [24.2 ± 3.5 months of age (mean ± SD)] were shipped to one of five livestock markets from their farms of origin in Iwate Prefecture. The calves were born in the 2002, 2003, and 2004 February-to-May calving seasons (spring) in their respective farmers’ feedlots. Bull calves were castrated at approximately 4–5 months after birth. The calves were grazed in regional public ranches with their dams from May to October each year before being returned to their respective farmers’ feedlots for finishing. The calves had restricted access to concentrate feeds and ad libitum roughage intake until shipping in 2004, 2005, and 2006. The roughage type in public ranches and farmers’ feedlots varied between rearing places. The general feeding conditions for fattening were as follows: (1) preceding term (8–16 months of age), 1.4% of BW concentrate intake per day and grass silage ad libitum; (2) midterm (17–20 months of age), 1.8% of BW concentrate intake per day and 2 kg/d of paddy straw; and (3) later term (more than 20 months of age), 8–10 kg/d of concentrate and 2 kg/d of paddy straw. After slaughter, the carcasses were dissected and evaluated at the sixth and seventh rib sections according to the Japanese meat grading system by a certified grader of the Japan Meat Grading Association (1988). The traits measured included carcass weight (CW; kg), longissimus muscle area (LMA; cm2), rib thickness (RT; cm), subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT; cm), and firmness, texture, and beef marbling score number (BMS No.). Marbling was scored from 1 (poor) to 12 (very abundant) according to the beef marbling standard (Japan Meat Grading Association 1988).

Statistical analysis

A mixed-inherited animal model was used to evaluate the effect of genotype and to compute basic summary statistics on traits of interest. The snp_ad, snp_a, snp_d, and epi_snp options of the Qxpak software (Pérez-Enciso and Misztal 2004) were used for analyzing the additive and dominant effects of the DelR242 [or nt-7(C > A)] locus and for the effect of epistasis between the DelR242 and nt-7(C > A) loci. The following models were used:where y or y is an individual phenotypic observation; the effect of year i (i, 14 or 3 levels for Exp. 1 or Exp. 2), the grazing area effect (area) (j, 5 or 4 levels for Exp. 1 or Exp. 2), the sex effect (sex) (l, 2 levels for Exp. 2), and the shipping month effect (shipping) (m, 12 levels for Exp. 2) were used as fixed effects. b is a regression coefficient of age (x) at the start of direct testing (Exp. 1) or of month of shipping (Exp. 2). In this analysis, the infinitesimal genetic effect was included and treated as a random effect (u) with covariance matrix, Aσu2 (where A is the numerator relationship matrix). e and e are vectors of random residual effects. SNP is the single-locus SNP (including the DelR242) genotypic effect, which was partitioned into additive (a) and dominance (d) effects. The likelihood ratio test was performed by removing the single-locus SNP genotypic effect from the model, and normal P values were obtained by assuming a χ2 distribution of the likelihood ratio test (degrees of freedom = 2). The proportion of genotypic variance explained by the model was calculated as follows:The ratio of the variance of dominance deviation to the additive genetic variance of the trait was calculated as follows:where p and q are allelic frequencies, a and d are additive and dominant effects of the DelR242 locus, respectively, and V is the additive genetic variance of the trait obtained from an animal model ignoring single-locus SNP genotypic effects (Falconer and Mackay 1996). For least-squares means analysis, we performed analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with the generalized linear model (GLM) procedure in SAS (SAS 2004) fitting the fixed effects of genotype (Exp. 1 and Exp. 2), test year (Exp. 1 or Exp. 2), grazing area (Exp. 1 or Exp. 2), sex (Exp. 2), shipping month (Exp. 2), sire (17 levels for Exp. 2), and a linear covariate of age of animals on testing (Exp. 1) or shipping (Exp. 2). The significance threshold was set to a Bonferroni-corrected P depending on the number of traits in Exp. 1.

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis

In total, 30 nucleotide variations (26 SNPs, 3 indels including DelR242 and intron 1 microsatellite [(GTTT) or (GTTT)] of 23 individuals (nine Bos taurus breeds; accession no.: AB492155–AB492177) were used to estimate local LD and haplotype blocks for a 5.8-kb genomic region that surrounds the DelR242 locus of GHSR1a. The genotype data [nt-7(C > A), nt456(G > A), and DelR242] of 95 sires and 540 half sibs were also used to estimate local LD. Local LD (r) and common haplotype patterns were computed with Haploview version 4.2 (Barrett ).

Results

Differences in allele and haplotype frequencies between sires and dams

The frequencies of the 3R allele of the DelR242 locus in the 17 sires of 540 half sibs and in the 540 half sibs were significantly higher than those in the 95 sire and 540 dam haplotypes. Differences in the allele frequencies of the DelR242, nt-7(C > A), nt456(G > A), and 5′UTR-(TG) loci between 17 sires and 540 half sibs were not significant (Table S2). Accordingly, allele and haplotype frequencies of the DelR242, nt-7(C > A), nt456(G > A), and 5′UTR-(TG) loci were compared between 95 sires (as “sires”) and 540 dam haplotype (as “dams”) (Table 1). It was evident that the frequencies of the 3R (DelR242), C [nt-7(C > A)], and A [nt456(G > A)] alleles in sires were significantly higher than those in dams (P < 0.03, P < 0.05, and P < 0.05, respectively). The χ2 values for the nt456(G > A) and nt-7(C > A) loci were lower than that for the DelR242 locus. There was no significant difference between sires and dams in allele frequencies of the 5′UTR-(TG) locus (P < 0.10). In comparison, it was evident that the haplotype frequencies of the C-3R ([nt-7(C > A)]-[DelR242] haplotype) and the A-3R ([nt456(G > A)]-[DelR242] haplotype) in sires were significantly higher than those in dams (P < 0.05 and P < 0.02, respectively). There was no significant difference between sires and dams in the [nt-7(C > A)]-[nt456(G > A)] and [5′UTR-(TG)]-[nt-7(C > A)]-[DelR242] haplotype frequencies (P < 0.10 and P < 0.10, respectively).
Table 1

Allele frequencies and haplotype frequencies in sires and dams in Japanese Shorthorn cattle

Locus Allele or HaplotypeSiresDamsFrequency Difference Between Sires and Dams
(190)a(540)bχ2dfcP
DelR2425.21<0.03
4R0.5950.686
3R0.4050.314
nt-7(C > A)4.61<0.05
A0.7320.806
C0.2680.194
nt456 (G > A)4.31<0.05
A0.4100.327
G0.5900.673
5′UTR-(TG)n15.29<0.10
19-TGd0.0160.0170.01
20-TG0.1950.2643.61
21-TG0.0110.0130.11
22-TG0.1160.2016.91<0.01
23-TG0.2110.1563.01
24-TG0.0680.0451.51
25-TG0.1530.1350.41
26-TG0.0370.0260.61
28-TG0.1790.1352.21
31-TG0.0160.0071.21
[nt-7(C > A)]-[DelR242]8.23<0.05
A-4R0.4950.6087.41<0.01
C-4R0.0950.0780.51
A-3R0.2370.1981.31
C-3R0.1740.1164.21<0.05
[nt456(G > A)]-[DelR242]7.92<0.02
A-4R0.0000.0132.51
G-4R0.5890.6734.41<0.05
A-3R0.4110.3145.91<0.05
[nt-7(C > A)]-[nt456(G > A)]7.03<0.10
A-A0.2370.1832.61
C-A0.1740.1520.51
A-G0.4940.6006.51<0.05
C-G0.0950.0651.91
[5′UTR-(TG)n]-[nt-7(C > A)]-[DelR242]30.721<0.10
[19-TG]-A-4R0.0160.0130.11
[19-TG]-A-3R0.0040.71
[20-TG]-A-4R0.1890.2583.61
[20-TG]-A-3R0.0040.71
[20-TG]-C-4R0.0050.0020.61
[21-TG]-A-4R0.0110.0130.11
[22-TG]-A-4R0.0890.1808.71<0.005
[22-TG]-A-3R0.0040.71
[22-TG]-C-4R0.0260.0180.51
[23-TG]-A-3R0.0320.0310.01
[23-TG]-C-4R0.0050.0110.51
[23-TG]-C-3R0.1740.1144.51<0.05
[24-TG]-A-4R0.0115.71<0.05
[24-TG]-C-4R0.0580.0450.51
[25-TG]-A-4R0.1530.1310.51
[25-TG]-A-3R0.0020.41
[25-TG]-C-4R0.0020.41
[26-TG]-A-4R0.0260.0131.61
[26-TG]-A-3R0.0110.0130.11
[28-TG]-A-3R0.1790.1352.21
[31-TG]-A-3R0.0160.0061.81
[31-TG]-C-3R0.0020.41

Allele frequencies of the GHSR1a-DelR242, nt-7(C > A), nt456(G > A), and 5′UTR microsatellite [5′UTR-(TG)] loci and haplotype frequencies of [nt-7(C > A)]-[DelR242], [nt456(G > A)]-[DelR242], [nt-7(C > A)]-[nt456(G > A)], and [5UTR-(TG)]-[nt-7(C > A)]-[DelR242] in sires and dams in Japanese Shorthorn cattle.

A total of 190 haplotypes derived from 95 sires.

A total of 540 haplotypes derived from 540 dams of 540 half sibs. A dam’s allele or haplotype was estimated by removing the sire’s transmitted allele or haplotype from the half sib’s genotypes or haplotype combinations. The sire genotypes were 14 4R/3R heterozygotes and 3 3R/3R homozygotes.

Degrees of freedom.

(TG)19

Allele frequencies of the GHSR1a-DelR242, nt-7(C > A), nt456(G > A), and 5′UTR microsatellite [5′UTR-(TG)] loci and haplotype frequencies of [nt-7(C > A)]-[DelR242], [nt456(G > A)]-[DelR242], [nt-7(C > A)]-[nt456(G > A)], and [5UTR-(TG)]-[nt-7(C > A)]-[DelR242] in sires and dams in Japanese Shorthorn cattle. A total of 190 haplotypes derived from 95 sires. A total of 540 haplotypes derived from 540 dams of 540 half sibs. A dam’s allele or haplotype was estimated by removing the sire’s transmitted allele or haplotype from the half sib’s genotypes or haplotype combinations. The sire genotypes were 14 4R/3R heterozygotes and 3 3R/3R homozygotes. Degrees of freedom. (TG)19

LD analysis in GHSR1a

We analyzed local LD and common haplotype patterns in a 5.8-kb genomic region around the DelR242 locus in GHSR1a. We found a haplotype block of approximately 2 kb from the nt667(C > T) in exon 1 to the nt2884 (A > G) in intron 1 (Figure 1A). In addition, local LD analysis clearly showed that the DelR242 locus is not in LD with nt-7(C > A), the 5′UTR-(TG), and the other 27 loci within GHSR1a, except for the nt456(G > A) locus. DelR242 is in LD with the nt456(G > A) locus (r = 1) (Figure 1 A). The strong LD between DelR242 and nt456(G > A) was confirmed in 95 sires and 540 half sibs (Figures 1, B and C). It was observed that nt70(C > G), nt580(G > A), nt667(C > T), and intron 1 microsatellite were fixed for the homozygous genotypes [C/C, G/G, C/C, and (GTTT), respectively] in the 540 half sibs. The 15 markers in intron 1 were considered as fixed for homozygotes on the basis of the result of local LD analysis in Japanese Shorthorn cattle (Figure 1). nt456(G > A) is a synonymous nucleotide substitution in exon 1.
Figure 1

Summary of local LD and haplotype blocks in a 5.8-kb genomic region that surrounds the DelR242 locus of GHSR1a. (A) Thirty nucleotide variations (26 SNPs, 3 indels including Del242 and the intron 1 microsatellite) [(GTTT) or (GTTT): (GTTT)] of 23 individuals (accession no. AB492155–AB492177). (B and C) Three nucleotide variations (nt-7(C > A), nt456(G > A), and DelR242) of 95 sires and 540 half sibs. LD plot generated in Haploview (Barrett ) indicates r values between pairs of SNPs multiplied by 100; white, r = 0; shades of gray, 0 < r < 1; black, r = 1. The nt-7(C > A), nt456(G > A), and DelR242 loci are indicated with black squares. Transcription start regions are shown with black arrows. 5′UTR-(TG), 5′UTR microsatellite.

Summary of local LD and haplotype blocks in a 5.8-kb genomic region that surrounds the DelR242 locus of GHSR1a. (A) Thirty nucleotide variations (26 SNPs, 3 indels including Del242 and the intron 1 microsatellite) [(GTTT) or (GTTT): (GTTT)] of 23 individuals (accession no. AB492155–AB492177). (B and C) Three nucleotide variations (nt-7(C > A), nt456(G > A), and DelR242) of 95 sires and 540 half sibs. LD plot generated in Haploview (Barrett ) indicates r values between pairs of SNPs multiplied by 100; white, r = 0; shades of gray, 0 < r < 1; black, r = 1. The nt-7(C > A), nt456(G > A), and DelR242 loci are indicated with black squares. Transcription start regions are shown with black arrows. 5′UTR-(TG), 5′UTR microsatellite.

Dominance/overdominance or additive effects of the 3R allele of the DelR242 locus

Table 2 and Table 3 show the summary of statistics, least-squares means of the DelR242 genotypes (Table 2), and dominance/overdominance or additive effects of the 3R allele of the DelR242 locus on growth, feed efficiency, and BSCM traits in direct-tested bulls, as well as on carcass traits from shipped half sibs using mixed-inherited animal model analysis (Table 3). In direct-tested bulls, the 3R allele had a significant dominance effect on ADG in both least-squares and mixed-inherited animal model analyses. The dominance effect was caused by overdominance. The effects of the DelR242 locus showed no significant association with the seven carcass traits from shipped half sibs. The results indicate a significant overdominance effect in the direct-tested bulls. The 4R/3R heterozygous individuals showed significantly higher ADG than the 4R/4R and 3R/3R homozygous individuals. The 4R/3R heterozygous individuals showed the highest relative growth rates of BW (BW_RGR) and CW (CW_RGR) during the direct-testing period among three genotype individuals (Table S3).
Table 2

Least-squares means of the effects of the DelR242 genotypes and conformation measurement traits

TraitsUnitsAbbreviationNo. of AnimalsMeanSDbLeast-Squares MeanP and Significance Leveld
4R/4R(SD)4R/3R(SD)3R/3R(SD)
(1) Direct-tested bulls(33)c(61)(27)
Age at the start of direct testingdAGE121245.120.6251.70(18.5)242.30(22.5)243.60(17.2)
Average dairy gainkg/dADG1211.280.141.24c(0.14)1.33a(0.1)1.21c(0.12)0.000***
180-d adjusted body weightkg180BW121242.230.8238.2(34.5)242.4(30.8)247(26.3)0.473
365-d adjusted body weightkg365BW121480.637.7469.7b(40.2)490.2a(36.4)472.1a,b(32.9)0.005
Total thickness of 8 points of subcutaneous fatmm8SFT12179.915.779.0(16.5)82(15.1)76.3(15.9)0.049
Roughage intake%ROUGH12145.02.344.4(2.1)45.0(2.4)45.6(2.0)0.072
Roughage weights per kg body weight gainkgROUGH_11213.800.493.77c(0.51)3.68c(0.39)4.12a(0.55)0.000**
Concentration weights per kg body weight gainkgCONC_11214.560.544.70a(0.57)4.39c(0.46)4.79a(0.58)0.000**
Body shape and conformation measurements
Withers height at the start of direct testingcmWH_S121115.23.5115.1(2.9)115.3(3.8)115.0(3.7)0.905
Withers height at the end of direct testingcmWH_E121127.13.3126.7(3.1)127.2(3.4)127.5(3.4)0.554
(25)c(47)(22)
Chest width at the start of direct testingcmCW_S9438.63.740.2(3.9)37.9(3.6)38.6(3.4)0.023
Chest width at the end of direct testingcmCW_E9446.82.946.4(2.9)47.2(3.0)46.4(3.0)0.504
Rump length at the start of direct testingcmRL_S9442.52.342.9(1.8)42.7(2.4)41.7(2.3)0.053
Rump length at the end of direct testingcmRL_E9448.92.248.8(1.9)49.1(2.3)48.7(2.4)0.720
Cannon circumference at the start of direct testingcmCC_S9417.70.817.6(0.9)17.8(0.6)17.4(0.8)0.079
Cannon circumference at the end of direct testingcmCC_E9419.80.719.9(0.8)19.9(0.7)19.7(0.8)0.605
(2) Shipped half sibsa(148)c(283)(106)
Slaughter agemo53724.23.524.2(3.5)24.2(3.6)24.0(3.0)
Carcass weightkgCW537407.038.0406.3(39.8)406.5(38.4)409.0(34.6)0.567
Longissimus muscle areacm2LMA53748.15.348.3(5.6)47.9(5.0)48.3(5.4)0.696
Rib thicknesscmRT5376.380.656.36(0.68)6.36(0.62)6.47(0.67)0.338
Subcutaneous fat thicknesscmSFT5372.390.662.41(0.64)2.38(0.66)2.38(0.69)0.800
Beef marbling scoreBMS5372.100.282.08(0.25)2.12(0.35)2.12(0.27)0.914
Firmness5372.090.292.09(0.29)2.08(0.29)2.08(0.28)0.596
Texture5372.380.492.35(0.48)2.34(0.48)2.44(0.50)0.286

Least-squares means of the effects of the DelR242 genotypes on growth, feed intake, and body shape and conformation measurement traits in direct-tested bulls and carcass traits in shipped half sibs.

209 dams and 328 steers.

SD.

Number of animals.

P and significance level (Bonferroni correction): *P = 0.05/15 = 0.0033; **P = 0.01/15 = 0.00067; ***P = 0.001/15 = 0.000067.15; †P = 0.10/15 = 0.0067. Number of traits for direct-tested bulls = 15. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; †P < 0.10, < 0.05; < 0.01. The direct testing duration is 140 d.

Table 3

Additive and dominance effects of the 3R allele of the DelR242 locus on growth, feed intake, and body shape and conformation measurements traits in direct-tested bulls and carcass traits in shipped half sibs

Traits (Abbreviation)aUnitsNo. of AnimalsbVAch2dEffect of the 3R Allele
LRTeP and Significance LevelfAdditive Effect [a]g(SE)Dominant Effect [d]g(SE)Ratio of Vah (%)Ratio of Vdi (%)Degree of Dominance [|d/a|]
(1) Direct-tested bulls
ADGkg/d1210.010.3712.550.002*0.01ns(0.02)0.08**(0.02)1.630.08.9
180BWkg121289.90.470.210.901−1.151.991.7
365BWkg121543.050.517.030.030−0.7216.40012.322.8
8SFTmm12150.040.521.260.533−1.620.580.4
ROUGH%1211.290.4410.270.0060.77**(0.25)−0.48ns(0.32)21.35.70.6
ROUGH_1kg1210.060.3110.450.0050.10ns(0.06)−0.25**(0.08)5.926.42.6
CONC_1kg1210.070.366.510.039−0.05−0.21
Body shape and conformation measurements
WH_Scm1214.330.593.570.165−0.370.95
WH_Ecm1214.180.561.740.419−0.040.70
CW_Scm943.80.514.360.113−0.77−0.78
CW_Ecm943.220.490.080.9600.08−0.13
RL_Scm941.970.666.070.048−0.640.30
RL_Ecm941.000.340.080.960−0.100.16
CC_Scm940.230.399.670.008−0.200.47
CC_Ecm940.210.495.280.071−0.200.21
(2) Shipped half sibs
CWkg537542.850.501.160.5611.32−2.54
LMAcm253710.910.440.720.6960.22−0.23
RTcm5370.160.402.170.3380.05−0.05
SFTcm5370.170.450.450.800−0.02−0.03
BMS5370.050.420.180.9140.010.01
Firmness5370.030.401.030.596−0.02−0.01
Texture5370.090.392.50.2860.03−0.06

For full names of the traits, see Table 2.

Total number of the 3 DelR242 genotype individuals (see Table 2).

Additive genetic variance.

Heritability.

Likelihood ratio test.

P and significance level (with Bonferroni correction): *P = 0.05/15 = 0.0033; †P = 0.10/15 = 0.0067; 15 = number of the traits for direct tested bulls. *P < 0.05; †P < 0.10.

Additive effect [a] and dominance effect [d] of the 3R allele. These effects were estimated by the snp_ad option. The significance levels for the additive effect [a] were estimated by the snp_a option and those for the dominance effect [d] were measured by the snp_d option: **P < 0.01; ns, not significant.

Proportion of the additive variance of the 3R allele to additive variance of the trait (V).

Ratio of the variance of dominance deviation of the 3R allele to V.

Least-squares means of the effects of the DelR242 genotypes on growth, feed intake, and body shape and conformation measurement traits in direct-tested bulls and carcass traits in shipped half sibs. 209 dams and 328 steers. SD. Number of animals. P and significance level (Bonferroni correction): *P = 0.05/15 = 0.0033; **P = 0.01/15 = 0.00067; ***P = 0.001/15 = 0.000067.15; †P = 0.10/15 = 0.0067. Number of traits for direct-tested bulls = 15. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; †P < 0.10, < 0.05; < 0.01. The direct testing duration is 140 d. For full names of the traits, see Table 2. Total number of the 3 DelR242 genotype individuals (see Table 2). Additive genetic variance. Heritability. Likelihood ratio test. P and significance level (with Bonferroni correction): *P = 0.05/15 = 0.0033; †P = 0.10/15 = 0.0067; 15 = number of the traits for direct tested bulls. *P < 0.05; †P < 0.10. Additive effect [a] and dominance effect [d] of the 3R allele. These effects were estimated by the snp_ad option. The significance levels for the additive effect [a] were estimated by the snp_a option and those for the dominance effect [d] were measured by the snp_d option: **P < 0.01; ns, not significant. Proportion of the additive variance of the 3R allele to additive variance of the trait (V). Ratio of the variance of dominance deviation of the 3R allele to V.

Discussion

Sex difference and high frequency of the 3R allele in Japanese Shorthorn cattle

Table 2 and Table 3 clearly show that a 4R/3R heterozygote weaner bull has a selective advantage over its homozygous peer in direct testing because of a heterozygous advantage of the DelR242 locus effect on ADG. The selection index formula for direct testing of Japanese Shorthorn bull is as follows (Materials and Methods in File S2):The aggregate breeding value formula for progeny testing of direct-tested bulls is as follows:These formulas show that ADG is the most important trait in the selection of Japanese Shorthorn sires. At present, the DelR242 genotypes of 11 core sires for insemination at IARC are seven 4R/3R heterozygotes and four 3R/3R homozygotes. The expected ratios of 4R/3R heterozygous individuals in progeny produced by mating of the progeny-tested sire with dams in 0.3 of the 3R allele frequency in the dam population are 30% for 4R/4R, 50% for 4R/3R, and 70% for 3R/3R sires (Table S4). These ratios could explain the significant sex differences between sires and dams and the higher 3R allele frequency in Japanese Shorthorn cattle than in other cattle breeds. The 3R allele of the DelR242 locus has been reported to be widely distributed at low frequency in both the B. taurus and B. indicus cattle breeds (Komatsu ), strengthening earlier assumptions that the original herd of Japanese Shorthorn cattle had a low frequency of the 3R allele. Consolidation of the selective advantage of the 4R/3R heterozygous weaner bulls would have the potential to increase the frequency of the 3R allele in the sire population and, subsequently, in the dam population of Japanese Shorthorn cattle. Because of the relatively small number of direct-tested bulls in this study, further investigations of the overdominance effect of the DelR242 locus on growth in weaner bulls in other herds and/or other beef cattle breeding populations carrying the 3R allele are required.

Overdominance effect of the DelR242 single locus

Exploitation of heterosis has become a major strategy for increasing the productivity of animals and plants. Dominance-based (Bruce 1910), overdominance-based (East 1936), and pseudo-overdominance/epistasis-based models (Stuber ; Stuber ) are commonly used to explain heterosis. The dominance model is based on the hybridization of two inbred parental lines to exploit breed complementarity in the F1 progeny by superior alleles at different loci, resulting in a phenotypic improvement over the mean of the parents. The overdominance model is based on interactions between the alleles originating from each parent at each locus that give rise to intralocus synergistic (nonlinear) effects on growth or other traits. The pseudo-overdominance model operates when two or more dominant or recessive mutations in different parents are linked or “in repulsion.” The epistasis model is based on nonallelic interactions between two or more loci that lead to superior phenotypic expression in hybrids (Goff and Zhang 2013). Gemmell and Slate (2006) provided five new examples of heterozygote advantage, or overdominance, on the basis of polymorphism in the oocyte-derived growth factor and growth differentiation factor of nine genes that affect female fecundity in domesticated sheep. It is important to determine whether the overdominance effect is controlled by the DelR242 single locus or other linked loci or by epistasis with other loci within GHSR1a. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified areas of the genome associated with feed intake and growth traits in beef cattle (Rolf ; Lu ; Saatchi ). One of the 66 SNPs markedly associated with residual feed intake is located at 85.95 Mb (Rolf ) on BTA1 and 1 of the 36 SNPs associated with dry matter intake (DMI) is located at 89.36 Mb on BTA1 (Lu ). One of the six large-effect quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with feedlot DMI is located at 107 Mb and 1 of the 11 large-effect QTL associated with mid-test BW is located at 98 Mb on BTA1 in the Angus cattle breed (Saatchi ). GHSR1a is located at 97.14 Mb on BTA1. Lindholm-Perry reported an association between SNP located at 97.25 Mb and average daily feed intake (ADFI) and between SNP located at 98.72 Mb and ADG on BTA1 in a crossbred beef cattle population used in the original GWAS (Snelling ). They did not find an association between the 3R allele substitution effect and ADFI or ADG. However, these authors did not estimate the dominance effect of the DelR242 locus on these traits. These studies suggest that one QTL associated with an overdominance effect on growth or feed intake in cattle is located within or adjacent to the GHSR1a region. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small (approximately 22 nucleotides long) endogenous noncoding molecules that can play important regulatory roles in animals and plants by targeting mRNAs for cleavage or translational repression. miRNAs mainly target complementary sites of 3′UTRs of mRNAs (Bartel 2004). We previously compared the 3′UTR sequences of GHSR1a among 10 haplotypes (Hap01–Hap10: Hap01–Hap08, the 4R type; Hap09 and Hap10, the 3R type; accessions AB492155–AB492175) and found no differences between haplotypes (Komatsu ). This result suggests that there are no differences between the 4R and 3R alleles in the allele-specific expression (ASE) of the GHSR1a transcripts that are attributable to miRNA regulation. The 19-TG allele of the 5′UTR-(TG) locus and the A allele of the nt-7(C > A) locus have been reported to show significant desirable additive effects on CW and ADG in Japanese Black cattle (Komatsu ). Epistatic effects between the DelR242 and nt-7(C > A) loci on the traits in direct-tested bulls and shipped half sibs were not significant (Table S5). Furthermore, the nt-7(C > A) locus showed neither additive nor overdominance effects on these traits in direct-tested bulls (Table S5). Taken together, these results suggest that the overdominance effect of the DelR242 locus on ADG observed in weaner bulls may be controlled by the DelR242 single locus. Further investigations of GWAS and epistatic effects between DelR242 and other loci are required to shed light on the single overdominance effect of the DelR242 locus on ADG in other Japanese Shorthorn herds.

Age-dependent overdominance effect of the DelR242 locus

Significant overdominance effects of the DelR242 locus on ADG were confined to the direct testing period (approximately 8 months of age) (Table 2 and Table 3). Percentage heterosis of BW and daily gains from birth to 13 months of age were the highest during the early postweaning period, similar to the period of 7–8 months of age in bulls from five inbred lines of Hereford cattle (Urick ). GH release in response to stimulation by ghrelin and GHRH is age-dependent, and episodic GH release is higher in postweaning than in preweaning calves and cows (Itoh ). A positive correlation between the area under the GH response curve (AUC-GH) to GHRH and ADG was observed in Angus weaner bulls (average age: 229 d) (Connor ). In cattle, GHSR1a mRNA expression was reported to be higher in the arcuate nucleus, pituitary gland, and liver than in other tissues, and GHSR1a mRNA expression in the arcuate nucleus of postweaning calves was 10-fold greater than that in preweaning calves and cows (Komatsu ). Ghrelin stimulates GH secretion, primarily by binding to GHSR1a on GHRH neurons in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (Mano-Otagiri ). Transgenic mice overexpressing human GHSR1a in GHRH neurons showed increased hypothalamic GHRH expression, pituitary GH contents, and postweaning growth rates. However, BWs of the transgenic mice became similar to those of the wild-type mice in adulthood (Lall ). Although we did not evaluate plasma GH concentrations or the additive, dominance, and overdominance effects of the DelR242 locus on the growth of bulls after direct testing through to adulthood, the results of the present study suggest that the overdominance effect of the DelR242 locus on growth is directly controlled by the highest episodic GH release in postweaning calves, resulting from the highest expression of GHSR1a mRNA in the arcuate nucleus.

A possible molecular mechanism and hypothesis for the DelR242 single-locus overdominance effect in weaner bulls

We considered a possible molecular mechanism of the overdominance effect caused by the DelR242 locus. We built a model structure of the GHSR1a dimer–Gαq complex on the basis of the suggestion by Holst that GHSR1a forms a homodimer (see Materials and Methods in File S1). We found that the 4R regions of the two GHSR1a protomers simultaneously interacted with Gαq at different sites when GHSR1a was dimerized via interactions between transmembrane helices 5 and 6 (TM-V and TM-VI) (Figure 2 and Figure S2). Deletion of an arginine residue from each 4R region will markedly change the structure of the region and the interactions with Gαq. Although it is difficult to predict how the Gαq-activation ability of the GHSR1a dimer is affected by deletion from the model structure, it is possible that the interactions between the GHSR1a(4R)–GHSR1a(3R) or GHSR1a(3R)–HSR1a(4R) “hetero”-dimer and Gαq are more favorable for the activation of Gαq than the interactions with GHSR1a “homo”-dimers. Thus, the activation of intracellular signaling transduction in the GHRH neuron of the 4R/3R heterozygotes becomes greater than that of the homozygotes.
Figure 2

Ribbon representation of a model structure of the GHSR1a(4R) dimer–Gαq complex. The two GHSR1a(4R) protomers are brown and light blue, and Gαq is orange. (A) Entire view. (B) Close-up view of the interface between 1 GHSR1a(4R) protomer and Gαq. Side-chain nonhydrogen atoms of the arginine residues of the 4R region of the GHSR1a(4R) protomer (Arg241, Arg242, Arg243, and Arg244) are shown in a stick representation. Nitrogen atoms are blue. Carbon atoms are colored in the same color as that of the ribbon. (C) Close-up view of the interface between the other GHSR1a(4R) protomer and Gαq. Arginine residues of the 4R region of the GHSR1a(4R) protomer are shown as in (B). Images were generated with UCSF Chimera (Pettersen ).

Ribbon representation of a model structure of the GHSR1a(4R) dimer–Gαq complex. The two GHSR1a(4R) protomers are brown and light blue, and Gαq is orange. (A) Entire view. (B) Close-up view of the interface between 1 GHSR1a(4R) protomer and Gαq. Side-chain nonhydrogen atoms of the arginine residues of the 4R region of the GHSR1a(4R) protomer (Arg241, Arg242, Arg243, and Arg244) are shown in a stick representation. Nitrogen atoms are blue. Carbon atoms are colored in the same color as that of the ribbon. (C) Close-up view of the interface between the other GHSR1a(4R) protomer and Gαq. Arginine residues of the 4R region of the GHSR1a(4R) protomer are shown as in (B). Images were generated with UCSF Chimera (Pettersen ).
  31 in total

1.  Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers.

Authors:  C W Stuber; S E Lincoln; D W Wolff; T Helentjaris; E S Lander
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Nonpeptide and peptide growth hormone secretagogues act both as ghrelin receptor agonist and as positive or negative allosteric modulators of ghrelin signaling.

Authors:  Birgitte Holst; Erik Brandt; Anders Bach; Anders Heding; Thue W Schwartz
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-05-19

3.  Genome-wide association analyses for growth and feed efficiency traits in beef cattle.

Authors:  D Lu; S Miller; M Sargolzaei; M Kelly; G Vander Voort; T Caldwell; Z Wang; G Plastow; S Moore
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Genetic association between GHSR1a 5'UTR-microsatellite and nt-7(C>A) loci and growth and carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle.

Authors:  Masanori Komatsu; Tomohito Itoh; Yuki Fujimori; Masahiro Satoh; Yoshiyuki Miyazaki; Hideaki Takahashi; Kazuhiro Shimizu; Aduli E O Malau-Aduli; Mitsuo Morita
Journal:  Anim Sci J       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 1.749

Review 5.  Ghrelin: structure and function.

Authors:  Masayasu Kojima; Kenji Kangawa
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  Predicting bull growth performance and carcass composition from growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone.

Authors:  E E Connor; S M Barao; L W Douglass; S A Zinn; G E Dahl
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  GH secretory responses to ghrelin and GHRH in growing and lactating dairy cattle.

Authors:  F Itoh; T Komatsu; M Yonai; T Sugino; M Kojima; K Kangawa; Y Hasegawa; Y Terashima; K Hodate
Journal:  Domest Anim Endocrinol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.290

8.  Ghrelin stimulation of growth hormone release and appetite is mediated through the growth hormone secretagogue receptor.

Authors:  Yuxiang Sun; Pei Wang; Hui Zheng; Roy G Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Recessive isolated growth hormone deficiency and mutations in the ghrelin receptor.

Authors:  Jacques Pantel; Marie Legendre; Sylvie Nivot; Séverine Morisset; Marie-Pierre Vie-Luton; Yves le Bouc; Jacques Epelbaum; Serge Amselem
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Ghrelin is produced in taste cells and ghrelin receptor null mice show reduced taste responsivity to salty (NaCl) and sour (citric acid) tastants.

Authors:  Yu-Kyong Shin; Bronwen Martin; Wook Kim; Caitlin M White; Sunggoan Ji; Yuxiang Sun; Roy G Smith; Jean Sévigny; Matthias H Tschöp; Stuart Maudsley; Josephine M Egan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds.

Authors:  Hadi Esfandyari; Peer Berg; Anders Christian Sørensen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 2.  Genetics and nutrition impacts on herd productivity in the Northern Australian beef cattle production cycle.

Authors:  Aduli E O Malau-Aduli; Jessica Curran; Holly Gall; Erica Henriksen; Alina O'Connor; Lydia Paine; Bailey Richardson; Hannake van Sliedregt; Lucy Smith
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.