AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is an endocrine hormone that exhibits anti-diabetic and anti-obesity activity. FGF21 expression is increased in patients with and mouse models of obesity or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the functional role and molecular mechanism of FGF21 induction in obesity or NAFLD are not clear. As endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is triggered in obesity and NAFLD, we investigated whether ER stress affects FGF21 expression or whether FGF21 induction acts as a mechanism of the unfolded protein response (UPR) adaptation to ER stress induced by chemical stressors or obesity. METHODS: Hepatocytes or mouse embryonic fibroblasts deficient in UPR signalling pathways and liver-specific eIF2α mutant mice were employed to investigate the in vitro and in vivo effects of ER stress on FGF21 expression, respectively. The in vivo importance of FGF21 induction by ER stress and obesity was determined using inducible Fgf21-transgenic mice and Fgf21-null mice with or without leptin deficiency. RESULTS: We found that ER stressors induced FGF21 expression, which was dependent on a PKR-like ER kinase-eukaryotic translation factor 2α-activating transcription factor 4 pathway both in vitro and in vivo. Fgf21-null mice exhibited increased expression of ER stress marker genes and augmented hepatic lipid accumulation after tunicamycin treatment. However, these changes were attenuated in inducible Fgf21-transgenic mice. We also observed that Fgf21-null mice with leptin deficiency displayed increased hepatic ER stress response and liver injury, accompanied by deteriorated metabolic variables. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that FGF21 plays an important role in the adaptive response to ER stress- or obesity-induced hepatic metabolic stress.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is an endocrine hormone that exhibits anti-diabetic and anti-obesity activity. FGF21 expression is increased in patients with and mouse models of obesity or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the functional role and molecular mechanism of FGF21 induction in obesity or NAFLD are not clear. As endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is triggered in obesity and NAFLD, we investigated whether ER stress affects FGF21 expression or whether FGF21 induction acts as a mechanism of the unfolded protein response (UPR) adaptation to ER stress induced by chemical stressors or obesity. METHODS: Hepatocytes or mouse embryonic fibroblasts deficient in UPR signalling pathways and liver-specific eIF2α mutant mice were employed to investigate the in vitro and in vivo effects of ER stress on FGF21 expression, respectively. The in vivo importance of FGF21 induction by ER stress and obesity was determined using inducible Fgf21-transgenic mice and Fgf21-null mice with or without leptin deficiency. RESULTS: We found that ER stressors induced FGF21 expression, which was dependent on a PKR-like ER kinase-eukaryotic translation factor 2α-activating transcription factor 4 pathway both in vitro and in vivo. Fgf21-null mice exhibited increased expression of ER stress marker genes and augmented hepatic lipid accumulation after tunicamycin treatment. However, these changes were attenuated in inducible Fgf21-transgenic mice. We also observed that Fgf21-null mice with leptin deficiency displayed increased hepatic ER stress response and liver injury, accompanied by deteriorated metabolic variables. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that FGF21 plays an important role in the adaptive response to ER stress- or obesity-induced hepatic metabolic stress.
Authors: Jody Dushay; Patricia C Chui; Gosala S Gopalakrishnan; Marta Varela-Rey; Meghan Crawley; Ffolliott M Fisher; Michael K Badman; Maria L Martinez-Chantar; Eleftheria Maratos-Flier Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-05-05 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Gregory Gaich; Jenny Y Chien; Haoda Fu; Leonard C Glass; Mark A Deeg; William L Holland; Alexei Kharitonenkov; Thomas Bumol; Holger K Schilske; David E Moller Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Umut Ozcan; Erkan Yilmaz; Lale Ozcan; Masato Furuhashi; Eric Vaillancourt; Ross O Smith; Cem Z Görgün; Gökhan S Hotamisligil Journal: Science Date: 2006-08-25 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Xinmei Zhang; Dennis C Y Yeung; Michal Karpisek; David Stejskal; Zhi-Guang Zhou; Feng Liu; Rachel L C Wong; Wing-Sun Chow; Annette W K Tso; Karen S L Lam; Aimin Xu Journal: Diabetes Date: 2008-02-05 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Paul A Dutchak; Takeshi Katafuchi; Angie L Bookout; Jang Hyun Choi; Ruth T Yu; David J Mangelsdorf; Steven A Kliewer Journal: Cell Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Angie L Bookout; Marleen H M de Groot; Bryn M Owen; Syann Lee; Laurent Gautron; Heather L Lawrence; Xunshan Ding; Joel K Elmquist; Joseph S Takahashi; David J Mangelsdorf; Steven A Kliewer Journal: Nat Med Date: 2013-08-11 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Katie C Coate; Genaro Hernandez; Curtis A Thorne; Shengyi Sun; Thao D V Le; Kevin Vale; Steven A Kliewer; David J Mangelsdorf Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Emmanuel Somm; Hugues Henry; Stephen J Bruce; Sébastien Aeby; Marta Rosikiewicz; Gerasimos P Sykiotis; Mohammed Asrih; François R Jornayvaz; Pierre Damien Denechaud; Urs Albrecht; Moosa Mohammadi; Andrew Dwyer; James S Acierno; Kristina Schoonjans; Lluis Fajas; Gilbert Greub; Nelly Pitteloud Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-04-20
Authors: Paulo Giovanni de Albuquerque Suassuna; Rogério Baumgratz de Paula; Hélady Sanders-Pinheiro; Orson W Moe; Ming-Chang Hu Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: Laurie R Braun; Meghan N Feldpausch; Natalia Czerwonka; Martin Torriani; Steven K Grinspoon; Takara L Stanley Journal: Growth Horm IGF Res Date: 2017-10-07 Impact factor: 2.372