Literature DB >> 25537425

Sustained effects of attentional re-training on chocolate consumption.

Eva Kemps1, Marika Tiggemann2, Joanna Elford2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Accumulating evidence shows that cognitive bias modification produces immediate changes in attentional bias for, and consumption of, rewarding substances including food. This study examined the longevity of these attentional bias modification effects.
METHODS: A modified dot probe paradigm was used to determine whether alterations in biased attentional processing of food cues, and subsequent effects on consumption, were maintained at 24-h and one-week follow-up. One hundred and forty-nine undergraduate women were trained to direct their attention toward ('attend') or away from ('avoid') food cues (i.e., pictures of chocolate). Within each group, half received a single training session, the other half completed 5 weekly training sessions.
RESULTS: Attentional bias for chocolate cues increased in the 'attend' group, and decreased in the 'avoid' group immediately post training. Participants in the 'avoid' group also ate disproportionately less of a chocolate food product in a so-called taste test than did those in the 'attend' group. Importantly, the observed re-training effects were maintained 24 h later and also one week later, but only following multiple training sessions. LIMITATIONS: There are a number of limitations that could be addressed in future research: (a) the inclusion of a no-training control group, (b) the inclusion of a suspicion probe to detect awareness of the purpose of the taste test, and (c) the use of different tasks to assess and re-train attentional bias.
CONCLUSIONS: The results showed sustained effects of attentional re-training on attentional bias and consumption. They further demonstrate the importance of administering multiple re-training sessions in attentional bias modification protocols.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional bias modification; Chocolate; Consumption; Dot probe task; Food cues

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25537425     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry        ISSN: 0005-7916


  9 in total

Review 1.  Executive function in childhood obesity: Promising intervention strategies to optimize treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Jacqueline F Hayes; Dawn M Eichen; Deanna M Barch; Denise E Wilfley
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 2.  Neurocognitive Treatments for Eating Disorders and Obesity.

Authors:  Dawn M Eichen; Brittany E Matheson; Sara L Appleton-Knapp; Kerri N Boutelle
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Attention bias modification produces no changes to appearance-related bias, state or trait body dissatisfaction in nonclinical women.

Authors:  Siobhan A Loughnan; Kate E Mulgrew; Ben R Lane
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2015-11-05

4.  An evidence-based gamified mHealth intervention for overweight young adults with maladaptive eating habits: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ioana R Podina; Liviu A Fodor; Ana Cosmoiu; Rareș Boian
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  The bogus taste test: Validity as a measure of laboratory food intake.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Ashleigh Haynes; Charlotte A Hardman; Eva Kemps; Suzanne Higgs; Andrew Jones
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Commentary: Gain in Body Fat Is Associated with Increased Striatal Response to Palatable Food Cues, whereas Body Fat Stability Is Associated with Decreased Striatal Response.

Authors:  Silvia Cerolini; Mariella Pazzaglia; Caterina Lombardo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Food Addiction: Implications for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Overeating.

Authors:  Rachel C Adams; Jemma Sedgmond; Leah Maizey; Christopher D Chambers; Natalia S Lawrence
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Cognitive bias modification for energy drink cues.

Authors:  Eva Kemps; Marika Tiggemann; Mikaela Cibich; Aleksandra Cabala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Attentional bias modification for chocolate: Sham-n training as a new control group.

Authors:  Eva Kemps; Marika Tiggemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.