| Literature DB >> 25537156 |
Lindsey Norgrove1, Stefan Hauser.
Abstract
In the Congo Basin, smallholder farmers practice slash-and-burn shifting cultivation. Yet, deliberate burning might no longer be sustainable under reduced fallow scenarios. We synthesized data from the Forest Margins Benchmark Area (FMBA), comprising 1.54 million hectares (ha), in southern Cameroon and assessed the impact of fire exclusion on yield, labor inputs, soil fertility, ecosystem carbon stocks, and fallow recovery indicators in two common field types (plantain and maize) under both current and reduced fallow scenarios. While we could not distinguish between impacts of standard farmer burning practice and fire exclusion treatments for the current fallow scenario, we concluded that fire exclusion would lead to higher yields, higher ecosystem carbon stocks as well as potentially faster fallow recovery under the reduced fallow scenario. While its implementation would increase labor requirements, we estimated increased revenues of 421 and 388 US$ ha(-1) for plantain and maize, respectively. Applied to the FMBA, and assuming a 6-year reduced fallow scenario, fire exclusion in plantain fields would potentially retain 240,464 Mg more ecosystem carbon, comprising topsoil carbon plus tree biomass carbon, than standard farmer practice. Results demonstrate a potential "win-win scenario" where yield benefits, albeit modest, and conservation benefits can be obtained simultaneously. This could be considered as a transitional phase towards higher input use and thus higher yielding systems.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25537156 PMCID: PMC4342523 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0431-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Manage ISSN: 0364-152X Impact factor: 3.266
Fig. 1Food crop fields and fallows within the forest margin benchmark of central/southern Cameroon. Adapted after Guyer (1980), de Wachter (1997), Diaw (1997), Carrière et al. (2002), Russell and Tchamou (2001), Gockowski et al. (2004), Brown (2006)
Fig. 2a Map of the forest margins benchmark area (FMBA) in Cameroon showing the distribution of research sites and rainfall. Annual rainfall averages (mm p.a.) for the sites during the experiments were 1634 (Bilik), 1533 (Zoatoupsie), 1533 (Ekombitié), 1786 (Andok), and 1836 (Ngoumbou). Grayscale represents the rainfall distribution according to data from the WorldClim database (Hijmans et al. 2005). b Situation of the FMBA in Cameroon and Africa
Summary of datasets used
| C/R | Y/S/F | Burned | Fire exclusion |
| Refc | Use of 1/ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short fallow cycle maize | |||||||
| C4 | Y | Dry grain yield (Mg ha−1) | 1.12 | 1.18 | ns | Hauser et al. ( | |
| C4 | S | pH (0–5 cm depth) | 4.13 | 4.41 | ns | Hauser et al. ( | |
| C4 | S | Total N (0–5 cm depth) (mg g−1) | 1.78 | 1.98 | ns | Hauser et al. ( | |
| C4 | S | Avail P (0–5 cm depth) (mg Kg−1) | 10.1 | 13.2 | ns | Hauser et al. ( | |
| C4 | S | Organic C (0–5 cm depth) (mg g−1) | 24.7 | 28.5 | ns | Hauser et al. ( | |
| R2 | Y | Dry grain yield (Mg ha−1) | 1.70 | 2.90 | * | Norgrove et al. ( | |
| R2 | Y | Leaf chlorophyll (SPAD) | 30.5 | 34.8 | * | Norgrove et al. ( | |
| R2 | S | pH (0–5 cm depth) | 6.73 | 6.69 | ns | Norgrove et al. ( | |
| R2 | S | Maximal soil temperature at 20 mm depth (°C) | 29.8 | 27.3 | * | Norgrove et al. ( |
|
| R2 | S | Earthworm casts prior to fallowing (Mg ha−1 year−1) | 1.59 | 1.71 | ns | Norgrove et al. ( | |
| R2 | S | Decomposition of mulch residues (half-life) days | 81.7 | 44.1 | * | Norgrove et al. ( |
|
| R2 | S | Bulk density (Mg m−3) (0–5 cm depth) | 0.94 | 0.85 | * | Norgrove et al. ( |
|
| Long fallow cycle plantain | |||||||
| C20 | Y | Plantain fresh bunch yield (Mg ha−1) | 6.26 | 6.16 | ns | Hauser et al. ( | |
| C20 | Y | Planting to harvest time | 921 | 923 | ns | Hauser et al. ( |
|
| C20 | S | pH (0–10 cm depth) | 5.09 | 4.73 | ns | Hauser et al. ( | |
| C20 | S | Total N (0–10 cm depth) (mg g−1) | 2.59 | 2.43 | ns | Hauser et al. ( | |
| C20 | S | Avail. P (0–10 cm depth) (mg kg−1) | 10.48 | 6.90 | ns | Hauser et al. ( | |
| C20 | S | Organic carbon (0–10 cm depth) (mg g−1) | 27.3 | 26.4 | ns | Hauser et al. ( | |
| C20 | F | Tree seedlings in understory, end of crop phasea (kg ha−1) | 7.08 | 26.67 | * | Hauser and Mekoa ( | |
| C17 | S | Maximal soil temperature at 60 mm depth (°C) | 26.9 | 26.5 | ns | Norgrove and Hauser ( | x |
| C17 | S | Earthworm cast production (Mg ha−1 year−1) | 27.6 | 25.9 | ns | Norgrove and Hauser ( | |
| C17 | S | Organic C (0–10 cm depth) (mg g−1) | 18.0 | 17.2 | ns | Norgrove and Hauser (unpubl.) | |
| C17 | S | pH (0–10 cm depth) | 5.11 | 4.78 | ns | Norgrove and Hauser (unpubl.) | |
| C17 | S | Total N (mg g−1) (0–10 cm depth) | 1.62 | 1.55 | ns | Norgrove and Hauser (unpubl.) | |
| C17 | F | % Remnant trees remaining after burn | 88 | 100 | * | Norgrove and Hauser (unpubl.) | |
| C17 | F | Remnant tree growth (kg tree−1 year−1) | 158 | 100 | * | Norgrove and Hauser (unpubl.); Norgrove and Hauser ( | |
| R6 | Y | Plantain fresh bunch yield (Mg ha−1) | 8.4 | 9.7 | * | Norgrove and Hauser ( | |
| R6 | Y | Planting to harvest time (days) | 671 | 560 | * | Norgrove and Hauser ( |
|
| R6 | S | Maximal soil temperature at 60 mm depth | 30.2 | 29.1 | * | Norgrove et al. ( |
|
| R6 | S | Earthworm cast production (Mg ha−1 year−1) | 51.4 | 39.6 | ns | Norgrove and Hauser (unpubl.) | |
| R6 | S | Organic C (0–10 cm depth) (mg g−1) | 20.4 | 23.2 | * | Norgrove and Hauser (unpubl.) | |
| R6 | S | pH (0–10 cm depth) | 5.15 | 4.94 | ns | Norgrove et al. (unpubl.) | |
| R6 | S | Total N (0–10 cm depth) (mg g−1) | 1.87 | 1.98 | ns | Norgrove et al. (unpubl.) | |
| R6 | S | Decomposition of weed residues (1/2 life) (days) | 46.9 | 41.1 | * | Norgrove et al. ( |
|
| R6 | F | % Remnant trees remaining after burn | 63 | 100 | * | Norgrove and Hauser (unpubl.) | |
| R6 | F | Remnant tree growth (kg tree−1 year−1) | 128 | 154 | * | Norgrove and Hauser (unpubl.); Norgrove and Hauser ( | |
| R6 | F | Tree seedlings in understory, end of crop phaseb (kg ha−1) | 20 | 86 | * | Norgrove et al. (unpubl.) | |
P refers to the significance of a difference between burned and fire exclusion treatments and is annotated as * for P < 0.05 and ns for P > 0.05
The use of the reciprocal, 1/x, was for parameters where a lower value denoted an improvement
C Current fallow length, R reduced fallow length: 2, 4, 6, 17, 20 are respective fallow lengths (years), Y yield parameters, S soil fertility parameters, F fallow regeneration parameters.
a At 942 days after planting (DAP);
b at 966 DAP
cReferences for further details, however, actual data values have not been presented in these papers as they incorporated other treatments
Fig. 3Relative (%) changes in yield and yield components of plantain and maize with fire exclusion under current (20-year plantain, 4-year maize) and reduced fallow scenarios (6-year plantain, 2-year maize). *Denotes significankt difference (P < 0.05) between fire exclusion and burning treatments
Fig. 4Relative (%) changes in those soil fertility parameters where significant (P < 0.05) differences were detected between fire exclusion and burning treatments. All were from reduced fallow scenarios (6-year plantain, 2-year maize). Soil temperature at 60 and 20 mm depth for plantain and maize, respectively. Decomposition (1/half-life) for weed residues in plantain plots and incubated mulch in maize plots
Fig. 5Relative (%) changes in fallow recovery parameters in “esep” fields under current (20-year, 17-year fallows) and reduced (6-year) fallow scenarios. *Denotes that parameter is significantly different (P < 0.05) between fire exclusion and burning treatments
Fig. 6Estimated areas (ha) of pooled “esep” long-fallow fields and three types of short-fallow fields in the FMBA, separated by forest cover block. Calculated after Nolte et al. (2001), Gockowski and Ndoumbé (2004), Gockowski et al. (2004)