Literature DB >> 25536880

Malleable penile prosthesis is a cost-effective treatment for refractory ischemic priapism.

Timothy J Tausch1, Lee C Zhao, Allen F Morey, Jordan A Siegel, Michael J Belsante, Casey A Seideman, James R Flemons.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Refractory ischemic priapism (RIP) can be difficult to treat, consuming significant healthcare-related resources. Acute insertion of a malleable penile prosthesis (MPP) has been reported as an effective therapy that treats the priapism and restores sexual function. AIM: We report our 6-year, urban public hospital experience with acute insertion of MPP in patients with RIP.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients receiving MPPs for RIP from 2007 to 2013. Data analyzed included duration of erection, number of emergency room (ER) visits, hospital admissions, days of hospitalization, and postoperative course. Costs were estimated using standard Medicare reimbursement rates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Healthcare-related costs of treatment of RIP episodes in men presenting to our institution.
RESULTS: During the study period, 14 men underwent MPP placement acutely for refractory priapism. Thirteen presented with RIP, and one had stuttering priapism over a 14-day hospitalization. Etiologies included sickle cell anemia (4/13, 29%), medication-induced (3/14, 21%), and idiopathic (7/14, 50%). Average preoperative duration of RIP was 82 hours with considerable consumption of health-care resources (average US $83,818 estimated cost, 4 ER visits [range 1-27], 2 hospital admissions [range 1-5], 1.5 shunt procedures [range 1-3], 5 irrigation and drainage procedures using phenylephrine injection [range 2-20], and 5 hospital admission days [range 2-14]). All patients were discharged within 24 hours of MPP surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The management of RIP is associated with multiple ER visits, prolonged hospital admissions, and significant resource utilization. MPP insertion is efficacious for the immediate resolution of refractory priapism, with potential cost and resource benefits.
© 2014 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erectile Dysfunction; Penile Prosthesis; Priapism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25536880     DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  11 in total

Review 1.  A practical overview of considerations for penile prosthesis placement.

Authors:  Landon Trost; Philip Wanzek; George Bailey
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Current Status for Semirigid Penile Prosthetic Devices.

Authors:  Raul E Fernandez-Crespo; Kristina Buscaino; Justin Parker; Rafael Carrion
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Ischaemic priapism: A clinical review.

Authors:  Joanne Ridgley; Nicholas Raison; M Iqbal Sheikh; Prokar Dasgupta; M Shamim Khan; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-03-01

Review 4.  Review of Ischemic and Non-ischemic Priapism.

Authors:  Mark G Biebel; Martin S Gross; Ricardo Munarriz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Surgical and minimally invasive treatment of ischaemic and non-ischaemic priapism: a systematic review by the EAU Sexual and Reproductive Health Guidelines panel.

Authors:  S Minhas; A Salonia; U Milenkovic; A Cocci; R Veeratterapillay; K Dimitropoulos; L Boeri; P Capogrosso; N C Cilesiz; M Gul; G Hatzichristodoulou; V Modgil; G I Russo; T Tharakan; M I Omar; C Bettocchi; J Carvalho; Y Yuhong; G Corona; H Jones; A Kadioglu; J I Martinez-Salamanca; P Verze; E C Serefoglu
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 6.  Malignant Priapism - What Do We Know About It?

Authors:  Dragos Marcu; Lucian Iorga; Dan Mischianu; Nicolae Bacalbasa; Irina Balescu; Ovidiu Bratu
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  The use of penile prostheses in the management of priapism.

Authors:  Jonathan Moore; Thomas F Whelan; Gavin M Langille
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

Review 8.  Management of refractory ischemic priapism: current perspectives.

Authors:  Marco Capece; Arianna Gillo; Andrea Cocci; Giulio Garaffa; Massimiliano Timpano; Marco Falcone
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2017-08-29

9.  Challenges surrounding penile prostheses insertion following acute priapism.

Authors:  Alex Tatem; Jason R Kovac
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

Review 10.  Advances in the understanding of priapism.

Authors:  Matthew Hudnall; Amanda B Reed-Maldonado; Tom F Lue
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.