| Literature DB >> 25536290 |
Michèle Allard1, Mathilde Husky2, Gwénaëlle Catheline3, Amandine Pelletier3, Bixente Dilharreguy2, Hélène Amieva4, Karine Pérès4, Alexandra Foubert-Samier5, Jean-François Dartigues5, Joel Swendsen3.
Abstract
The identification of biological and pathophysiological processes implicated in different forms of dementia is itself dependent on reliable descriptions of cognitive performance and capacities. However, traditional instruments are often unable to detect subtle declines in cognitive functions due to natural variation at the time of testing. Mobile technologies permit the repeated assessment of cognitive functions and may thereby provide more reliable descriptions of early cognitive difficulties that are inaccessible to clinic or hospital-based instruments. This assessment strategy is also able to characterize in real-time the dynamic associations between cognitive performance and specific daily life behaviors or activities. In a cohort of elderly rural residents, 60 individuals were administered neuropsychological and neuroimaging exams as well as a one-week period of electronic ambulatory monitoring of behavior, semantic memory performance, and daily life experiences. Whereas imaging markers were unrelated to traditional neuropsychological test scores, they were significantly associated with mobile assessments of semantic memory performance. Moreover, certain daily life activities such as reading or completing crossword puzzles were associated with increases in semantic memory performance over the subsequent hours of the same day. The revolution in mobile technologies provides unprecedented opportunities to overcome the barriers of time and context that characterize traditional hospital and clinical-based assessments. The combination of both novel and traditional methods should provide the best opportunity for identifying the earliest risk factors and biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25536290 PMCID: PMC4275158 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample.
| % | Mean | SD | |
|
| |||
| Age | 75.06 | 4.66 | |
| % female | 45.0 | ||
| Less than elementary school | 26.7 | ||
| Elementary school | 36.7 | ||
| More than Elementary school | 36.7 | ||
|
| |||
| Baseline neuropsychological testing | |||
| MMSE | 26.97 | 1.76 | |
| Similarities | 8.86 | 1.47 | |
| IST-15 | 28.39 | 5.13 | |
| IST-30 | 43.32 | 7.73 | |
| IST-60 | 64.05 | 13.17 | |
| Follow-up neuropsychological testing | |||
| IST-15 | 28.02 | 6.56 | |
| IST-30 | 42.72 | 9.21 | |
| IST-60 | 62.68 | 15.36 | |
| Volumetric variables | |||
| Total intracranial volume (cm3) | 1484.12 | 176.89 | |
| Left HPC volume (mm3) | 3456.37 | 457.09 | |
| Right HPC volume (mm3) | 3620.58 | 459.20 |
MMSE (Mini-Mental Status Examination); IST (Isaacs Set Test).
Association of mobile semantic memory test scores with brain structure volumes.
| Left | Right | |||||
| Variable | Coefficient | SE | T-ratio | Coefficient | SE | T-ratio |
| Age | 0.042 | 0.040 | 1.051 | 0.038 | 0.577 | 0.275 |
| Sex | 0.753 | 0.555 | 1.356 | 0.683 | 0.552 | 1.238 |
| Education | 1.017 | 0.282 | 3.606 | 1.072 | 0.289 | 3.705 |
| Total intracranial volume | 0.002 | 0.001 | 1.660 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 1.981 |
| Hippocampus volume | 0.001 | 0.000 | 2.950 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 2.935 |
| Age | 0.000 | 0.007 | 0.053 | 0.001 | 0.007 | 0.131 |
| Sex | 0.160 | 0.111 | 1.439 | 0.151 | 0.113 | 1.329 |
| Education | 0.183 | 0.064 | 2.871 | 0.177 | 0.062 | 2.868 |
| Total intracranial volume | 0.001 | 0.000 | 1.834 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 1.533 |
| Caudate nucleus volume | −0.000 | 0.000 | −0.848 | −0.000 | 0.000 | −0.382 |
**p<0.01,
***p<0.001.
Figure 1Percentage of correct responses to mobile semantic memory tests as a function of hippocampal volume.