A new transplantable ovarian tumor model is presented using a novel folate receptor (FR) positive, murine ovarian cancer cell line that emulates the human disease and induces widespread intraperitoneal (i.p.) tumors in immunocompetent mice within 4-8 weeks of implantation. Tumor development was monitored using a new positron emission tomography (PET) FR-targeting reporter with PET/computerized tomography (PET/CT) and fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT) using a commercial FR-targeting reporter. Conventional structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was also performed. Adult female C57BL/6 mice were injected i.p. with 6 × 10(6) MKP-L FR+ cells. Imaging was performed weekly beginning 2 weeks after tumor induction. The albumin-binding, FR-targeting ligand cm09 was radiolabeled with the positron emitter (68)Ga and used to image the tumors with a small animal PET/CT. The FR-reporter FolateRSense 680 (PerkinElmer) was used for FMT and flow cytometry. Preclinical MRI (7 T) without FR-targeting was compared with the PET and FMT molecular imaging. Tumors were visible by all three imaging modalities. PET/CT had the highest imaging sensitivity at 3-3.5 h postadministration (mean %IA/g mean > 6) and visualized tumors earlier than the other two modalities with lower kidney uptake (mean %IA/g mean < 17) than previously reported FR-targeting agents in late stage disease. FMT showed relatively low FR-targeted agent in the bladder and kidneys, but yielded the lowest anatomical image resolution. MRI produced the highest resolution images, but it was difficult to distinguish tumors from abdominal organs during early progression since a FR-targeting MRI reporter was not used. Nevertheless, there was good correlation of imaging biomarkers between the three modalities. Tumors in the mouse ovarian cancer model could be detected using FR-targeted imaging as early as 2 weeks post i.p. injection of tumor cells. An imaging protocol should combine one or more of the modalities, e.g., PET/CT or PET/MRI for optimal tumor detection and delineation from surrounding tissues.
A new transplantable ovarian tumor model is presented using a novel folate receptor (FR) positive, murine ovarian cancer cell line that emulates the human disease and induces widespread intraperitoneal (i.p.) tumors in immunocompetent mice within 4-8 weeks of implantation. Tumor development was monitored using a new positron emission tomography (PET) FR-targeting reporter with PET/computerized tomography (PET/CT) and fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT) using a commercial FR-targeting reporter. Conventional structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was also performed. Adult female C57BL/6 mice were injected i.p. with 6 × 10(6) MKP-L FR+ cells. Imaging was performed weekly beginning 2 weeks after tumor induction. The albumin-binding, FR-targeting ligand cm09 was radiolabeled with the positron emitter (68)Ga and used to image the tumors with a small animal PET/CT. The FR-reporter FolateRSense 680 (PerkinElmer) was used for FMT and flow cytometry. Preclinical MRI (7 T) without FR-targeting was compared with the PET and FMT molecular imaging. Tumors were visible by all three imaging modalities. PET/CT had the highest imaging sensitivity at 3-3.5 h postadministration (mean %IA/g mean > 6) and visualized tumors earlier than the other two modalities with lower kidney uptake (mean %IA/g mean < 17) than previously reported FR-targeting agents in late stage disease. FMT showed relatively low FR-targeted agent in the bladder and kidneys, but yielded the lowest anatomical image resolution. MRI produced the highest resolution images, but it was difficult to distinguish tumors from abdominal organs during early progression since a FR-targeting MRI reporter was not used. Nevertheless, there was good correlation of imaging biomarkers between the three modalities. Tumors in the mouseovarian cancer model could be detected using FR-targeted imaging as early as 2 weeks post i.p. injection of tumor cells. An imaging protocol should combine one or more of the modalities, e.g., PET/CT or PET/MRI for optimal tumor detection and delineation from surrounding tissues.
Entities:
Keywords:
68Ga; FolateRSense; MRI; PET/CT; cm09; fluorescence molecular tomography; folate receptor targeting; immunocompetent ovarian cancer mouse model
Epithelial ovarian
cancer (EOC) has the highest mortality rate
among gynecologic malignancies in the USA and Europe.[1] Because of nonspecific symptoms and lack of effective screening,
EOC is usually diagnosed at late stages, when the tumor has spread
within the peritoneal cavity. For patients diagnosed at an advanced
stage, the 5-year survival rate is under 30%. In contrast, when diagnosed
with “low volume,” localized, early stage disease, the
survival rate is greater than 90%.[2] Progress
in early diagnosis, improved therapeutic success against the primary
tumor, and increased ability to prevent or lower rates of recurrence
depend in part on the development of useful preclinical animal (e.g.,
mouse) models that mirror the tumor biology seen in humans.Traditionally, subcutaneous (s.c.) and intraperitoneal (i.p.) tumor
xenografts in immunodeficientnude mice were used as a model system.
However, tumor growth and treatment in these models are affected by
immune system deficiencies.[3] The syngeneic,
immunocompetent orthotopic model system provides an alternative and
potentially more appropriate ovarian cancer model for studies on pathogenic
mechanisms and preclinical testing of new therapies.[4] Several genetically engineered mouse models were developed
during the past decade, incorporating genetic mutations often observed
in human disease.[3] Transplantable tumor
models whereby tumor cells were injected into immunocompetent mice
resulted in widespread peritoneal dissemination that closely resembled
the recurrent tumors seen in the human disease.[5] The advent of these mouse models offers opportunities for
numerous in vivo studies targeting various aspects
of disease, ranging from mechanisms of early tumor development to
pharmacological responses to therapy. However, an accurate assessment
of the outcome in such studies often requires in vivo imaging technologies with adequate specificity and sensitivity.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography/computerized
tomography (PET/CT), optical, single photon emission computed tomography
(SPECT), and ultrasound are used in both preclinical and clinical
applications for the detection and characterization of EOC. Molecular
imaging of EOC through various biomarkers will yield information at
the molecular and cellular level of the disease. One such biomarker
for EOC is folate receptor (FR) alpha (FRα). FRα expression
is known to be highly elevated in 75–85% of epithelial ovarian
tumors when compared to normal tissues with the exception of the kidneys
and choroid plexus.[6−8] Therefore, FRα is a prime target for diagnostic
imaging and therapeutic interventions in EOC. Current FR-targeting
strategies include the use of anti-FRα antibodies or folic acid
conjugates to imaging agents, therapeutic compounds, T cells, nanoparticles,
and oncolytic viruses.[9−16]FR-targeting imaging tracers were successfully developed and
tested in vivo during the past decade. The SPECT
tracer FolateScan
(99mTc-EC20, Endocyte) is used in clinical studies for
solid tumors with high FR-expression.[17,18] The folate
conjugate cm09 includes an albumin-binding entity that increases its
serum half-life and a DOTA-chelator that allows radiolabeling with
a variety of nuclides for either SPECT or PET imaging, or radionuclide
therapy.[19−21] The optical FR-targeting agent FolateRSense 680 (FR680,
PerkinElmer) can be used for both flow cytometry and preclinical imaging.
FR-targeting MRI agents based on gadolinium (Gd) or iron oxide were
demonstrated, but the inherent tracer sensitivity of MRI is inferior
to PET, SPECT, and optical modalities.[22−27]We report herein a new transplantable ovarian tumor model
using
a novel FRα+ ovarian tumor cell line, MKP-L. On the basis of
this model, we developed and optimized a preclinical FR-targeted imaging
protocol for the detection of FRα+ MKP-Ltumors in C57BL/6J
mice. Tumor-bearing mice were imaged by three separate modalities:
PET/CT using the PET agent 68Ga-cm09, optical fluorescence
molecular tomography (FMT) using FolateRSense 680, and structural
MRI (without FR-targeting). In this animal model, each of the imaging
modalities displayed different strengths and weaknesses. These results
suggest an optimal imaging protocol and reveal future directions for
multimodal ovarian tumor imaging.
Experimental Section
In Vitro Detection of Folate Receptor on Murine
Ovarian Cancer Cells
The MKP-L cell line was derived from
one MUC1KrasPten (MKP) mouse with a late stage, loco-regionally spread,
orthotopic ovarian tumor. The MKP preclinical model employs conditional
(Cre-loxP) mutations in oncogenic Kras and Ptentumor suppressors.
Upon AdCre injection under the ovarian bursa, the MKP mice progress
to endometrioid ovarian tumors that spread loco-regionally and are
accompanied by ascites accumulation.[28] The
MKP-L primary ovarian tumor cells were cultured in complete Dulbecco’s
modified eagle medium (DMEM, Corning cellgro), containing 10% fetal
bovine serum (FBS, 1% nonessential amino acids, 10,000 U/L penicillin,
10,000 μg/mL streptomycin, 2 mM l-glutamine, 1 mM sodium
pyruvate, and 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (all from Sigma-Aldrich, St.
Louis, MO).To identify cell surface FRα expression, MKP-L
cells were stained in vitro with 600 nM FR680 diluted
in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. Staining was performed at 37 °C for 1 h, under
gentle agitation of the tubes, manually performed every 15 min. Cells
were immediately analyzed with an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences)
and FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences). Unstained cells were used
for gating strategies. Any cells scattered outside the autofluorescence
signal were considered FR+. Total FRα protein expression was
also confirmed via Western blot. A total of 2 million MKP-L cells
were lysed in 100 μL of 1× sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)
loading buffer (62.5 mM Tris pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.1 M dithiothreitol
(DTT), and 0.01% bromophenol blue). Twenty microliters of cell lysate
were subjected to 4−20% SDS-PAGE and blotted with anti-FRα
rabbit polyclonal antibody (Abcam, ab67422) diluted 1:1000 in blocking
buffer (5% skim milk with 0.05% Tween-20 in PBS). Blotting was performed
overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were developed using goat antirabbit
IgG–HRP, 1:3000 (BIO-RAD, #170-6515) and the Immun-Star WesternC
kit (Bio-Rad). Images were taken by Chemidoc XRS darkroom system (Bio-Rad).
In Vivo Ovarian Tumor Formation
All
procedures complied with the University of Pittsburgh Institutional
Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. Nine to ten week old adult
female C57BL/6J mice (Jackson Laboratory, n = 13)
were injected i.p. with 6 × 106 MKP-L cells in 250
μL of PBS. Tumors were allowed to grow until ascites developed
or the mice showed signs of pain and/or distress.Imaging was
performed after implantation to monitor tumor growth using 3 cohorts
and 3 tumor-free controls (see Supporting Information). Cohorts 2 (n = 6) and 3 (n =
2), and two mice from Cohort 1 (n = 5) were fed a
folate-deficient, low autofluorescence diet (Harlan Teklad TD.01013) ad libitum (without succinylsulfathiazole) beginning at
tumor induction until euthanasia. The remaining 3 mice (Cohort 1)
received folate-deficient diet 24–36 h before and during imaging,
and regular chow otherwise. Mice were not completely deprived of folate
(either by diet or via endogenous production by gut flora) since long-term
folate deprivation alters animal growth and tumor metabolism. When
mice were imaged in all modalities in the same week, PET/CT was performed
on the first day, followed by MRI on the second day and FMT on the
third day to minimize FR saturation by the FR-targeting reporters.
PET/CT
Gallium-68 (68Ga)
68Ga (t1/2 = 68 min, Eaverageβ+ = 0.830 MeV, 88%) was obtained from a 68Ge/68Ga generator (1.110 MBq, IGG100, Eckert and Ziegler,
Berlin, Germany). All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO), unless otherwise specified. Aqueous
solutions were prepared using ultrapure water (resistivity, 18 MΩ).
68Ga Labeling
The 68Ga/68Ge generator was eluted with 5–7 mL of 0.1 M HCl, and the
eluate (666–740 MBq) was loaded onto a cation exchange column
(Strata-X-C, Phenomenex). 68Ga was eluted with 0.8–1
mL of 0.02 M HCl/98% acetone. DOTA-folate (cm09)[19] was labeled with 68Ga (30–150 MBq, 50–150
μL) in ammonium acetate buffer (100–150 μL,
0.1 M, pH 4.0) within 10 min at 90 °C. Quality control was performed
by radio reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC).
The radiotracer solutions were prepared for animal studies by dilution
with sterile 0.9% NaCl.
Internalization Assay with 68Ga-cm09
The
FR-mediated internalization of 68Ga-cm09 was studied for
the MKP-L cells. MKP-L cells were cultured in DMEM media supplemented
with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin–streptomycin–glutamine (PSG),
and 2-mercaptoethanol, and cells were incubated at 37 °C, 5%
CO2. One week before the assay, the cells were cultured
in a folate-free cell culture medium FFRPMI (modified RPMI, without
folic acid, vitamin B12, and phenol red; Cell Culture Technologies
GmbH) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% PSG, and 2-mercaptoethanol. MKP-L
cells were seeded in 12-well plates (500,000 cells in 2 mL of supplemented
folate-free medium without 10% FBS per well) to grow for 2 days. On
the day of the experiment, half of the wells were incubated for 15,
30, 60, and 120 min at 37 °C with excess folic acid (100 μM)
in FFRPMI to block FRs on the surface of the MKP-L cells. 68Ga-cm09 was prepared in high labeling yield and radiochemical purity
(>98%) at a specific activity of 12–13 MBq/nmol. Ten minutes
after incubation of the cells (half of them with folic acid), 68Ga-cm09 (14 pmol) was added to each well and incubated for
15, 30, 60, and 120 min at 37 °C. At specific time points, MKP-L
cells were washed two times with PBS. To assess the internalized fraction,
MKP-L cells were washed with a sodium acetate-phosphate buffered saline
(NaOAC-PBS) pH 4 to release FR-bound 68Ga-cm09 from
the cell surface. The lysis of cells was accomplished by the addition
of 0.5% SDS-PBS, which enabled transfer of the cell suspensions into
tubes for measurement in a γ-counter. The total protein concentration
in the cell lysate was determined using the BCA Protein Assay (Pierce
Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). Internalized and surface-bound fractions
were expressed as fmol/mg of protein.
PET/CT and Image Analysis
The mice were injected with
100 μL of 68Ga-cm09 (6.5–7.4 MBq, 0.5–0.8
nmol) via tail vein and imaged using an Inveon Small Animal PET/CT
(Siemens Molecular Imaging, Knoxville, TN). For tail vein injection
and throughout imaging, the mice were anesthetized with 2 to 3% isoflurane
under oxygen at a flow rate of 2 L/min. Ten minute static scans were
acquired approximately 3 to 3.5 h after 68Ga-cm09 injection
using the Inveon PET/CT. The 3–3.5 h timing was based on biodistribution
studies we conducted in healthy nude mice that showed stable tissue
signal in the liver and kidneys despite the short half-life of 68Ga. 68Ga-cm09 uptake in tumors and other organs
(heart, liver, kidneys, bladder, and muscle) was quantified using
the image analysis software Inveon Research Workplace (IRW, Siemens
Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA, USA). Regions of interest (ROIs) were
drawn on the fused PET/CT images. The percentage injected activity
per gram (%IA/g) was calculated as
ROI activity divided by injected dose multiplied by 100% using the
IRW software for quantitative comparison among the images.A
blocking PET/CT imaging study was also conducted to examine the specificity
of in vivo uptake of 68Ga-cm09. For this
experiment, two tumor bearing mice (Cohort 3) were scanned at 6 weeks
post-tumor cell injection with 68Ga-cm09 to determine the
location of tumors. The following day, 68Ga-cm09 PET/CT
imaging was repeated with the same mice preinjected with a blocking
dose of excess folic acid (100 μg in 100 μL of PBS for
each mouse).
Biodistribution Analysis
Immediately
following PET/CT
imaging at 7 weeks post-tumor cell injection, 3 mice (Cohort 2) were
sacrificed and major organs and tissues (liver, kidneys, lung, spleen,
heart, intestine, muscle, and tumors) and blood were collected and
weighed. Radioactivity was measured using an automatic WIZARD[2] gamma counter (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). The
results are presented as %IA/g tissue.
Fluorescence Molecular
Tomography (FMT)
Mice were injected
with 2 nmol FR680 fluorescent imaging agent (PerkinElmer) in 100 μL
of sterile PBS/mouse via the lateral tail. Prior to imaging, abdominal
and back fur were removed using Nair (Church and Dwight). FMT images
were acquired using the 680 nm channel (λexcitation = 680 nm; λemission = 700 nm) of a VisEn FMT2500
(PerkinElmer) 6 h after FR680 injection. The mice were anesthetized
via isoflurane and oxygen mixture, placed in the imaging cassette
(VisEn Medical) and imaged in the supine position. Mice were anesthetized
throughout the duration of image acquisition, i.e., 5–8 min,
depending on the size of the scan field.
Image Analysis
FMT images were reconstructed with the
FMT2500 system software TrueQuant (PerkinElmer). FR680 was precalibrated
on the FMT2500. Three-dimensional ROIs were drawn around the whole
abdomen region to quantify total FR680 uptake (reported in picomoles).
Three mice were used as negative controls (Mouse 14, and Mice 3 and
4 at week 1 before they had detectable tumors). Individual tumor ROIs
were drawn utilizing necropsies as a reference. Data are presented
as tumor to muscle ratios of fluorescence signal. For overlay images,
the fluorescence signal and planar image were mirrored to align with
MRI and PET/CT images.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
A Bruker 7 Tesla (T)
ClinScan system was used for all MRI. An 8.6 cm diameter 1H whole-body radiofrequency volume coil was used for transmission,
and a surface receive-only 8 × 1 mouse body volume-array coil
was used for reception. The mice were anesthetized via isoflurane
and oxygen throughout imaging and monitored using the SAII Model 1030
Small Animal Monitoring and Gating System (Small Animal Instruments,
Inc.). The animals were kept warm using a SAII MR-compatible Small
Rodent Heater System (Small Animal Instruments, Inc.).Coronal
and axial T1- (TE = 12 ms, average TR = 850 ms) and T2-weighted (TE = 56 ms, average TR = 1250 ms) abdominal images
were acquired using turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences with an approximate
resolution of 0.12 mm × 0.12 mm × 0.9 mm. Respiratory gating
was used to minimize motion artifacts in the TSE sequences. Additionally,
a 3D fast low angle shot (FLASH) volumetric interpolated breath hold
examination (VIBE) sequence was used to image intestinal tissue (TE
= 3 ms, TR = 5.8 ms, approximate resolution 0.12 mm × 0.12 mm
× 0.8 mm).After the acquisition of the images described
above, the gadolinium-based
contrast gadobenate dimeglumine (Multihance, Bracco Imaging) was diluted
to 52.9 mg/mL in sterile 0.9% NaCl solution and injected via the lateral
tail vein at a dosage of 0.1 mmol/kg (105.8 mg/kg). Additional T1-weighted coronal and axial images were obtained 30 min and
1 h after contrast injection.
Euthanasia, Tumor Dissection,
and Immunohistochemistry
The mice were monitored for the
development of ascites as an indicator
of tumor growth. When the amount of ascites fluid exceeded 5 mL and/or
the mice began to show signs of pain or distress, the mice were sacrificed
via CO2 asphyxiation or cervical dislocation. Tumor tissue
was harvested at necropsy and immediately placed in 10% formalin,
followed by ethanol fixation and paraffin embedding. Four micron sections
were stained for FRα expression using the same antibody as for
Western blot. For detection, we employed Dako EnVision+ System-HRP
labeled Polymer Anti-Rabbit (K4003) DAB substrate Kit (Abcam, ab64238).
Images were captured with Zeiss camera-equipped microscope using AxioVision
software.
Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as mean
± SD related with 68Ga-cm09 experiments. For FMT experiments,
data are presented as mean ± SE. A Student’s t test (2-tailed, unpaired) was used to compare two data sets and p values less than 0.05 were considered significant. All
statistical analysis was performed using PRISM software (GraphPad).
Results
Transplantable Ovarian Tumor Model
The MKP-L expresses
FRα, as detected by Western Blot (Figure 1A), with 90% of cells showing cell surface expression by flow cytometry
(Figure 1B). This is in contrast to the low
FR expression seen in immortalized IG10 murine ovarian cancer cells,
derived from ovarian surface epithelial cells of healthy female mice
(Figure 1A,B).[4] When
injected i.p., the MKP-L cells invariably trigger widespread abdominal
tumors, clinically detectable between 4 and 8 weeks following tumor
cell injections. If left untreated, mice succumb to large disease
burden, within approximately 8–10 weeks post-tumor challenge.
Tumor implants were detected throughout the peritoneal cavity, often
surrounding the major organs such as the kidneys, liver, intestines,
bladder, and stomach. Six of the 13 mice (46%) injected with tumor
cells developed ascites 5–8 weeks after implantation (see Table
S1 in Supporting Information). The tumors
were FRα+, as confirmed with immunohistochemistry, demonstrating
that the MKP-L cells maintained FRα expression during in vivo tumor formation (Figure 1C). Overall, these results validate the MKP-Lovarian tumor cells
as a new FRα+ transplantable tumor model in immunocompetent
mice.
Figure 1
Folate receptor expression in MKP-L cells in vitro and in vivo. (A) FR protein expression in MKP-L
cells detected by Western blot using rabbit anti-FR polyclonal antibody.
Low FR expressing IG10 murine ovarian cancer cells were used as controls.
Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) protein levels were
used as loading controls. (B) FR protein expression in IG10 (left
two histograms) and MKP-L (right two histograms), detected with flow
cytometry using fluorescent FR680. Cells not exposed to FR680 (autofluorescence)
were used as negative controls. The gate for FR positive events was
set outside of the control histogram. Background staining (0.1 and
0.3%) and the percentage of FR+ IG10 and MKP-L cells are shown (13.6
and 90.3%, respectively). The same FR680 concentration was used for
both cell lines. (C) MKP-L tumor histology. Female mice were injected
i.p. with 6 × 106 cells; tumors were isolated at necropsy,
formalin-fixed, and paraffin embedded. Five micron sections were prepared
for histology. Left panel: HE staining of a MKP-L tumor section (10×).
Image shown is representative of tumors from three different mice,
with at least two tumor sites sampled. Second and third panels (from
left to right): IHC staining for FR (10× and 40× objectives,
respectively), using anti-FR antibody. FR positive cells are shown
in brown (S: stroma, T: tumor). Right panel: IHC image of one section
stained with isotype control antibody. Scale bars: 100 μm.
Folate receptor expression in MKP-L cells in vitro and in vivo. (A) FR protein expression in MKP-L
cells detected by Western blot using rabbit anti-FR polyclonal antibody.
Low FR expressing IG10 murine ovarian cancer cells were used as controls.
Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) protein levels were
used as loading controls. (B) FR protein expression in IG10 (left
two histograms) and MKP-L (right two histograms), detected with flow
cytometry using fluorescent FR680. Cells not exposed to FR680 (autofluorescence)
were used as negative controls. The gate for FR positive events was
set outside of the control histogram. Background staining (0.1 and
0.3%) and the percentage of FR+ IG10 and MKP-L cells are shown (13.6
and 90.3%, respectively). The same FR680 concentration was used for
both cell lines. (C) MKP-Ltumor histology. Female mice were injected
i.p. with 6 × 106 cells; tumors were isolated at necropsy,
formalin-fixed, and paraffin embedded. Five micron sections were prepared
for histology. Left panel: HE staining of a MKP-Ltumor section (10×).
Image shown is representative of tumors from three different mice,
with at least two tumor sites sampled. Second and third panels (from
left to right): IHC staining for FR (10× and 40× objectives,
respectively), using anti-FR antibody. FR positive cells are shown
in brown (S: stroma, T: tumor). Right panel: IHC image of one section
stained with isotype control antibody. Scale bars: 100 μm.
Gallium-68 (68Ga) Labeling and Internalization Assay
The internalization
behavior for 68Ga-cm-09 is shown
in Figure 2. Six percent of the total activity/mg
protein was specifically internalized after 2 h incubation time. Cell-associated
activity was significantly reduced after blockade with folic acid.
Figure 2
Internalization
of 68Ga-cm09 in MKP-L cells (n = 3). All
data are normalized for protein content. By
2 h, the amount of 68Ga-cm09 internalized reached 4587.94
± 550.08 fmol/mg protein (A), whereas the amount of 68Ga-cm09 bound to the cell surface reached 19415.90 ± 2543.50
fmol/mg protein (B). Specific receptor-mediated internalization and
surface bound fraction was blocked by folic acid in the medium (p = 0.011 and p = 0.001, respectively).
Error bars represent standard deviations.
Internalization
of 68Ga-cm09 in MKP-L cells (n = 3). All
data are normalized for protein content. By
2 h, the amount of 68Ga-cm09 internalized reached 4587.94
± 550.08 fmol/mg protein (A), whereas the amount of 68Ga-cm09 bound to the cell surface reached 19415.90 ± 2543.50
fmol/mg protein (B). Specific receptor-mediated internalization and
surface bound fraction was blocked by folic acid in the medium (p = 0.011 and p = 0.001, respectively).
Error bars represent standard deviations.
PET/CT Imaging and Biodistribution Analysis
The PET/CT
images of 68Ga-cm09 in mice with peritoneal tumors showed
high and specific uptake of 68Ga-cm09 in the tumors compared
to control (baseline) mice (Figures 3–6). A substantial increase in tumor uptake of 68Ga-cm09 started after 2 weeks (Figures 3G and 6). Tumor progression was quantified
using the %IA/g from the ROIs. Figure 3G shows
the tumor to muscle ratios of 68Ga-cm09 over time. To ensure
that the same tumor region was evaluated at each time point, ROIs
were first defined using the scan taken at the last time point where
focal uptake was obvious (7 weeks), and then an ROI of equal size
was defined retrospectively for each of the earlier scans. The tumor
to muscle ratios of 68Ga-cm09 were 3–3.5 in the
earlier weeks (Figure 3G), with a trend of
increasing over the course of the disease progression. However, because
of high variability at later stage disease, these changes were not
statistically significant (p = 0.43). Tumors that
formed in close proximity to the kidneys and bladder were not included
since the high activity in normal tissues prevented accurate quantification
in the tumors. Further, in some cases, increased uptake was observed
in the heart and major vessels within the epigastric and superior
umbilical regions. Suspicious lesions in these areas were also not
included in our calculations.
Figure 3
Detection of i.p. MKP-L
tumors by 68Ga-cm09 PET/CT in
late stage disease in a control mouse vs 5 tumor-bearing mice (T#
= tumor (and tumor index); K = kidneys), showing the various levels
of disease (numbers of tumors, presence or not of ascites). All images
were obtained 3–3.5 h after injection of the radiotracer. Images
presented in %IA/g. Individual images are scaled based on the highest
activity tumor. (A) Control mouse (Mouse 12); (B) Mouse 8, 5 weeks
after MKP-L cell injection (T1 = 7.6 %IA/g, T2 = 7.7 % IA/g, K = 12.3 %IA/g); (C) Mouse 10, 7 weeks after MKP-L cell
injection (T1 = 13.9 %IA/g, kidneys, K = 12.6 %IA/g);
(D) Mouse 5, 6 weeks after MKP-L cell injection (T1 = 13.9 %IA/g, K = 12.5 %IA/g); (E) Mouse 1, 5 weeks after MKP-L cell injection
(T1 = 15.1 %IA/g, T2 = 13.5 %IA/g, T3 = 12.1 %IA/g, K = 10.4 %IA/g); (F) Mouse 3, 5 weeks after MKP-L cell injection with
ascites (tumors were dispersed throughout peritoneum and were not
assigned indices, ascites activity = 6.9 %IA/g, K = 14.1 %IA/g). (G) Tumor to muscle ratios
of 68Ga-cm09 over time based on image ROI analysis in mice
that had observable tumors at each weekly imaging session. In week
2, number of mice (NM) = 4, number of
tumors (NT) = 3; in week 3, NM = 4, NT = 7; in week 4, NM = 4, NT = 7; in
week 5, NM = 7, NT = 21; in week 6, NM = 7, NT = 24; in week 7, NM = 3, NT = 12. (H) Biodistribution and
(I) PET/CT data in the same MKP-L-bearing mice (n = 3) injected with 68Ga-cm09. The biodistribution study
at 4 h postinjection (p.i.) was performed after PET/CT imaging (3
h). The PET color scales are in units of %IA/g. Error bars represent
standard deviations.
Figure 6
Coronal images of a C57BL/6 mouse (Mouse 7)
2–7 weeks after
MKP-L injection before the development of ascites. (A,D,G,J,M,P) T2-weighted MR images. (B,E,H,K,N,Q) PET/CT images. (C,F,I,L,O,R)
FMT images. Yellow arrows indicate tumors and/or tracer uptake outside
of the kidneys and bladder. The PET color scales are in units of %IA/g.
The biodistribution analysis at
4 h post 68Ga-cm09 injection (n = 3) immediately
following PET/CT imaging showed specific accumulation (4.2 ±
1.5 %IA/g) of the radiotracer in tumors (Figure 3H,I). The highest activity for 68Ga-cm09, 16.7 ±
4.7 %IA/g, was found in the kidneys. Blood had the second highest
activity, 10.8 ± 2.1 %IA/g, likely due to the albumin-binding
properties of cm09 that prolongs its blood circulation time. The influence
of the molar amount of cm09 labeled with 177Lu on tissue
distribution was previously investigated.[19] There was a slight trend toward increasing accumulation of radioactivity
in the blood, tumors, and kidneys as the amount of cm09 injected was
increased. However, the tumor to muscle ratios also remained largely
unchanged. In this study, high blood uptake might also correlate with
the injected molar amount (0.5–0.8 nmol) of 68Ga-cm09.
However, the kidney to muscle ratio was 13.0 ± 2.6 and 12.3 ±
5.1 for PET/CT images (n = 3) and the biodistribution
study (n = 3), respectively. High folate uptake in
the kidney is expected due to its intrinsically high FR-expression.[8]Since 68Ga-cm09 was mostly eliminated
by the kidneys,
lower activity was observed in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (the
small and large intestine uptake was 2.3 ± 1.2 and 2.5 ±
0.3 %IA/g at 4 h p.i. (n = 3), respectively). Overall,
tumor uptake in the same mice by ROI analysis from the PET/CT images
at 3 h p.i. was higher than the biodistribution results (6.5 ±
1.5 vs 4.6 ± 1.7 %IA/g) due to partial volume effects: most tumors
were localized in fatty tissues, and it was not easy to remove the
tumors without including some of the surrounding fat for the biodistribution
studies for total tumor quantification.Detection of i.p. MKP-Ltumors by 68Ga-cm09 PET/CT in
late stage disease in a control mouse vs 5 tumor-bearing mice (T#
= tumor (and tumor index); K = kidneys), showing the various levels
of disease (numbers of tumors, presence or not of ascites). All images
were obtained 3–3.5 h after injection of the radiotracer. Images
presented in %IA/g. Individual images are scaled based on the highest
activity tumor. (A) Control mouse (Mouse 12); (B) Mouse 8, 5 weeks
after MKP-L cell injection (T1 = 7.6 %IA/g, T2 = 7.7 % IA/g, K = 12.3 %IA/g); (C) Mouse 10, 7 weeks after MKP-L cell
injection (T1 = 13.9 %IA/g, kidneys, K = 12.6 %IA/g);
(D) Mouse 5, 6 weeks after MKP-L cell injection (T1 = 13.9 %IA/g, K = 12.5 %IA/g); (E) Mouse 1, 5 weeks after MKP-L cell injection
(T1 = 15.1 %IA/g, T2 = 13.5 %IA/g, T3 = 12.1 %IA/g, K = 10.4 %IA/g); (F) Mouse 3, 5 weeks after MKP-L cell injection with
ascites (tumors were dispersed throughout peritoneum and were not
assigned indices, ascites activity = 6.9 %IA/g, K = 14.1 %IA/g). (G) Tumor to muscle ratios
of 68Ga-cm09 over time based on image ROI analysis in mice
that had observable tumors at each weekly imaging session. In week
2, number of mice (NM) = 4, number of
tumors (NT) = 3; in week 3, NM = 4, NT = 7; in week 4, NM = 4, NT = 7; in
week 5, NM = 7, NT = 21; in week 6, NM = 7, NT = 24; in week 7, NM = 3, NT = 12. (H) Biodistribution and
(I) PET/CT data in the same MKP-L-bearing mice (n = 3) injected with 68Ga-cm09. The biodistribution study
at 4 h postinjection (p.i.) was performed after PET/CT imaging (3
h). The PET color scales are in units of %IA/g. Error bars represent
standard deviations.Mice receiving a blocking dose of folic acid showed a significant
(p = 0.001) reduction in uptake of the 68Ga-cm09 in kidneys and tumors (Figure 4) according
to their baseline images, which were taken 1 day prior.
Figure 4
(A) Small animal
PET/CT maximum intensity projection images of
MKP-L tumor bearing mouse (Mouse 15) at 3 h post injection of 68Ga-cm09 (T# = tumor (and tumor index). PET/CT
scan of nonblocked (left) and preblocked (right) of the same mouse
indicates specific tumor uptake of 68Ga-cm09. Uptake in
tissues is presented in units of %IA/g. The tail signal in the preblocked
mouse is due to extravasation that occurred during the initial attempt
of the tail vein injection. (B) PET/CT uptake at 3 h p.i. of 68Ga-cm09 in the nonblocked and blocked MKP-L tumor-bearing
mouse (p = 0.001). (C) PET/CT organ or tumor to muscle
uptake ratios between nonblocked and blocked mouse (p = 0.002). Error bars represent standard deviations.
(A) Small animal
PET/CT maximum intensity projection images of
MKP-Ltumor bearing mouse (Mouse 15) at 3 h post injection of 68Ga-cm09 (T# = tumor (and tumor index). PET/CT
scan of nonblocked (left) and preblocked (right) of the same mouse
indicates specific tumor uptake of 68Ga-cm09. Uptake in
tissues is presented in units of %IA/g. The tail signal in the preblocked
mouse is due to extravasation that occurred during the initial attempt
of the tail vein injection. (B) PET/CT uptake at 3 h p.i. of 68Ga-cm09 in the nonblocked and blocked MKP-Ltumor-bearing
mouse (p = 0.001). (C) PET/CT organ or tumor to muscle
uptake ratios between nonblocked and blocked mouse (p = 0.002). Error bars represent standard deviations.Coronal and dissection images of a C57BL/6 mouse (Mouse
1) sacrificed
5 weeks after MKP-L injection showing ascites and widespread i.p.
tumors. Images in the top row are the most dorsal and include stomach
and kidneys, middle row images are medial, and bottom row images are
the most ventral and include the bladder. (A,E,H) T2-weighted
MR images. (B,F,I) PET/CT images. (C,G,J) FMT images. (D) Gross dissection
of i.p. tumors. Yellow arrows indicate tumors and/or tracer uptake
outside of the kidneys and bladder. The PET color scales are in units
of %IA/g.Coronal images of a C57BL/6 mouse (Mouse 7)
2–7 weeks after
MKP-L injection before the development of ascites. (A,D,G,J,M,P) T2-weighted MR images. (B,E,H,K,N,Q) PET/CT images. (C,F,I,L,O,R)
FMT images. Yellow arrows indicate tumors and/or tracer uptake outside
of the kidneys and bladder. The PET color scales are in units of %IA/g.
FMT Imaging
FMT
of FR680 detected tumor masses as early
as 2 weeks postimplantation (Figures 5–7). ROIs covering the whole abdominal
region were drawn to obtain the total i.p. FR680 uptake and to account
for total tumor development (Figure 7H,I).
Control mice showed that FR680 uptake in mice without tumors was minimal
at 6 h p.i. compared to the total fluorescence signal in the abdominal
cavities of tumor-bearing mice. The total i.p. fluorescence signal
in nontumor bearing mice was used to normalize the total i.p. fluorescence
signal from tumor-bearing mice. The average tumor to muscle ratios
throughout the study were ∼3, with no statistically significant
differences in the weekly ratios (p > 0.05).
Figure 5
Coronal and dissection images of a C57BL/6 mouse (Mouse
1) sacrificed
5 weeks after MKP-L injection showing ascites and widespread i.p.
tumors. Images in the top row are the most dorsal and include stomach
and kidneys, middle row images are medial, and bottom row images are
the most ventral and include the bladder. (A,E,H) T2-weighted
MR images. (B,F,I) PET/CT images. (C,G,J) FMT images. (D) Gross dissection
of i.p. tumors. Yellow arrows indicate tumors and/or tracer uptake
outside of the kidneys and bladder. The PET color scales are in units
of %IA/g.
Figure 7
FMT imaging
of MKP-L tumors. (A–F) FMT images of a tumor-bearing
mouse (Mouse 10) injected with 2 nmol FR680 at 2–7 weeks post-tumor
implantation show the development of tumors in the i.p. cavity. (G)
FMT images of a nontumor-bearing mouse injected with 2 nmol FR680.
(H) Tumor volumes in Mouse 10 over time. Blue bars represent total
tumor volume in the i.p. cavity, red bars represent tumor volume in
the left side of the i.p. cavity, and green bars represent tumor volume
in the right side of the i.p. cavity. (I) Tumor to muscle ratios of
quantified FR680 fluorescence signal in the i.p. cavity over time.
Error bars represent standard error.
FMT imaging
of MKP-Ltumors. (A–F) FMT images of a tumor-bearing
mouse (Mouse 10) injected with 2 nmol FR680 at 2–7 weeks post-tumor
implantation show the development of tumors in the i.p. cavity. (G)
FMT images of a nontumor-bearing mouse injected with 2 nmol FR680.
(H) Tumor volumes in Mouse 10 over time. Blue bars represent total
tumor volume in the i.p. cavity, red bars represent tumor volume in
the left side of the i.p. cavity, and green bars represent tumor volume
in the right side of the i.p. cavity. (I) Tumor to muscle ratios of
quantified FR680 fluorescence signal in the i.p. cavity over time.
Error bars represent standard error.
MRI Results
Tumors were best detected in the T2-weighted MRIs (Figure 8), where they
typically appeared to be brighter than the surrounding tissue, particularly
once ascites developed (Figure 5). The T1-VIBE images were useful for distinguishing healthy intestinal
tissue from tumor tissue as the tumor tissue grew throughout the abdominal
cavity and became intertwined with the intestines. Gadobenate dimeglumine
administration did not enhance tumor visibility in the T1-weighted images (Figure 8). However, interstitial
fluid in the peritoneum was brightened in the p.i. images. Tumors
in the peritoneal cavity were visible in MR images at 3 weeks post-tumor
cell injection (Figure 6).
Figure 8
MRI images of a periadrenal
tumor at 6 weeks (Mouse 10) after induction
taken with different imaging sequences. (A) T2-weighted
turbo spin echo (TSE), (B) T1-weighted volume interpolated
gradient echo (VIBE), which makes intestinal tissue appear bright
white, (C) T1-weighted TSE, and (D) T1-weighted
TSE after the administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent.
The tumor area is outlined in white. (E–H) Magnified images
showing the periadrenal tumors and surrounding adrenal and intestinal
tissue.
MRI images of a periadrenal
tumor at 6 weeks (Mouse 10) after induction
taken with different imaging sequences. (A) T2-weighted
turbo spin echo (TSE), (B) T1-weighted volume interpolated
gradient echo (VIBE), which makes intestinal tissue appear bright
white, (C) T1-weighted TSE, and (D) T1-weighted
TSE after the administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent.
The tumor area is outlined in white. (E–H) Magnified images
showing the periadrenal tumors and surrounding adrenal and intestinal
tissue.
Multimodal Imaging
Cohort 2 was imaged every week starting
at 2 weeks p.i. of MKP-L cells by MRI, small animal PET/CT, and FMT
(Figure 6). Tumors were visible by all three
modalities with varying sensitivity and anatomical resolution. The
growth of individual tumor regions was monitored over time. In one
example (Figure 6), the tumor was initially
visualized at 2 weeks postimplantation by PET/CT and FMT imaging and
at 3–4 weeks by MRI. However, in another representative mouse
(Figure 5), there were four tumors that were
clearly observed by 5 weeks postimplantation by all three imaging
modalities.
Discussion
The clinical management
of EOC will benefit from diagnostic techniques
that can detect primary tumors in the early stages and monitor recurrent
disease. Herein, we describe a novel FRα+ transplantable EOC
mouse model that mimics a recurrent form of human disease. We evaluated
the effectiveness of multimodal imaging for the early detection of
peritoneal tumor implants in an immunocompetent host using FR-targeted
imaging agents. Our EOC mouse model is easy to produce and has a yield
approaching 100%. Similarly, transplantation of the BRCA1-deficientBR5 cell line in FVB/NJ mice produces intraperitoneal tumors.[29] The BR5 cell line was also found to have high
FR-expression. The MKP cells derive from an animal with MUC1 overexpression,
which occurs in ∼90% of human EOC and only 5% of normal ovarian
tissue.[28,30] By contrast, BRCA1 mutations are only responsible
for ∼10% of EOC.[31]However,
not all human or murine ovarian cancer cell lines have
significant FR-expression. Indeed, we found that with the exception
of the MKP-L cell line, most of the MKP cell line variants had low
FR expression.Intraperitoneal MKP-Ltumors were detected by
all three imaging
modalities. Overall, PET/CT and FMT molecular imaging detected FRα+
tumor tissue as early as 2 weeks after tumor cell implantation (Figure 6). MRI had the highest anatomical resolution of
the three modalities, but its utility was limited by the lack of a
FR-targeted reporter. Co-registration of the images was challenging
despite the availability of a multimodality animal imaging cassette
(PerkinElmer). The FMT and PET/CT scans had to be conducted on different
days to avoid the competition of the different reporters for FRs so
positioning of the animal varied between scans. The cassette is poorly
suited for MRI since it requires the MRI receiver coil to be placed
outside of the cassette, centimeters away from the animal, resulting
in significant signal loss. Ideally, the structural and molecular
images should be acquired during the same exam, e.g., using PET/CT
or PET/MRI to facilitate image coregistration and maximize the diagnostic
benefit.PET imaging is used in both preclinical and clinical
settings to
noninvasively study the molecular basis of disease and to guide the
development of novel molecular-based treatments.[32] Clinical PET has superior sensitivity and resolution versus
SPECT.[33] Small animal PET imaging is able
to quantify radiotracer uptake within lesions with a resolution of
<2 mm and a remarkably high reporter sensitivity of up to 10–11–10–12 mol/L.[34] Previously reported folate-based radiopharmaceuticals
developed for PET imaging show rapid clearance from blood circulation,
which results in low background organ exposure and enhances tumor
to blood activity ratios.[35−39] However, these pharmacokinetic properties also lead to low uptake
in tumor tissue and high accumulation of radioactivity in the kidneys.[35,37−39] To overcome this issue, Müller et al.[19] designed a folate conjugate, DOTA-folate (cm09),
with an albumin-binding entity to prolong circulation in the blood
and improve tumor to kidney ratios. The conjugate cm09 was labeled
with the longer-lived beta emitting radionuclide, 177Lu,
and the resulting agent showed therapeutic efficacy in a FRα+
tumor-bearing mouse model.[19] The conjugate
cm09 was subsequently radiolabeled with 44Sc (t1/2 = 3.97 h, Eaverageβ+ = 0.632 MeV, 94.3%) for PET imaging.[21]Here we set out to determine whether 68Ga-cm09
would
visualize orthotopic FRα+ ovarian tumors by PET imaging. The
physical 68 min half-life of 68Ga is shorter than the 4
h biological half-life of cm09 in blood. However, our imaging results
indicate that the half-life of 68Ga is sufficient for FR-imaging
in our model and should result in lower radiation dose than 44Sc in vivo. 64Cu (t1/2 = 12.70 h, Eaverageβ+ = 0.653 MeV) and 89Zr (t1/2 = 3.27 days, Eaverageβ+ = 0.389 MeV) would make attractive PETnuclides for radiolabeling
the albumin-binding folate agent if the DOTA chelator was replaced
with either a NODAGA (64Cu) or a desferrioxamine (89Zr) chelator to allow the formation of stable complexes.[40,41]FR binding studies with KB cells were previously conducted
using
radiolabeled cm09 and its predecessor, 67Ga-DOTA-Bz-EDA-folate
(without the albumin binder).[21,36] These studies showed
cell binding of 40–70% and internalization of ∼20% at
120 min p.i. Our study showed cell binding and internalization of
25% and 6% IA/mg protein, respectively. Blocking with folic acid resulted
in negligible uptake and internalization for all studies. Therefore,
the ratio of internalization/cell binding was higher for the KB cells
compared with the MKP-L. However, KB cells have 2–10 times
higher FR-expression than serous and metastatic ovarian tumors.[7,8]We did not conduct uptake studies using the FR680 optical
tracer.
Studies by PerkinElmer showed high uptake in KB cells and a dissociation
constant (Kd) of 5 nM.[42]In vivo, the concentration of FR680 in
KB xenografts was 400 pmol at 4 h after injection of 2 nmol FR680.
Blocking with folic acid reduced uptake by 99% and 80% in
vitro and in vivo, respectively.68Ga-cm09 has the advantage of lower kidney uptake (16.65
± 4.74% IA/g at 4 h p.i.) compared to the previously reported,
more rapidly clearing 68/67Ga tracers (130.31 ± 14.65
vs 111.96 ± 15.33 %IA/g at 4 h p.i. reported for 68/67Ga–P3246 and 68/67Ga–P3238; 103.01 ±
24.58 vs 103.95 ± 16.96 %IA/g at 4 h p.i. reported for 68/67Ga–P3026 and 68/67Ga–P1254; and 84.53 ±
14.10 %IA/g at 4 h p.i. for 67Ga-DOTA-Bz-EDA-folate).[36−38] Even though 68Ga-cm09 cleared slowly from the blood,
there was still good visualization of the orthotopic MKP-Ltumors
even in mice that had intermittent folate in their diet.Optical
imaging is widely used in preclinical studies and increasingly
in clinical settings for intraoperative fluorescence image guided
surgery.[12,43] While FMT is limited by the diffusive nature
of near-infrared (NIR) photons that limit depth penetration to a few
centimeters, FMT imaging systems enable noninvasive, quantitative
molecular imaging of small animals without the use of ionizing radiation.[44] The FMT2500 system used in the present study
has a low reporter threshold for detection (down to 1 pmol), similar
to PET with comparable spatial resolution (>1 mm). However, FMT
has
the ability to image multiple tracers at the same time.[45]High-field MRI is commonly used in small
animal imaging to detect
and characterize tumors throughout the body in addition to its clinical
applications.[46] In this study, T2-weighted images readily revealed tumor tissue at the middle stage
of the disease starting at approximately 4 weeks after implantation.Several MRI reporters are available that can bind to tumor-specific
receptors and enhance visibility.[47,48] The present
study utilized nonspecific gadobenate dimeglumine, which alters the
relaxation times of water molecules in intravascular and extracellular
spaces, typically leading to enhanced visibility of tumors and lesions.
However, in the imaging of the EOC mouse model, gadobenate dimeglumine
did not enhance tumor visibility. Folate receptor targeted MRI contrast
agents based on magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) are commercially available
(e.g., Nanopartz) for use in preclinical models. However, the MNPs
produce hypointense signals using T2- or T2*-weighted
MRI that are difficult to discern from abdominal tissues such as bowel.In this study, the three different imaging modalities were combined
to overcome the limitations of the individual techniques to detect
tumor tissue as early as 2 weeks postimplantation of MKP-L cells.
Because of the lack of an anatomical imaging technique and the diffusive
nature of light, FMT displayed the lowest anatomical resolution of
the three imaging modalities. Incorporation of another imaging modality,
such as MRI, and coregistration of the images would benefit both modalities.
Second, while tumors are well visualized using PET/CT, high renal
uptake limits tumor delineation near the kidneys. In this study, we
used the albumin-binding capabilities of cm09 to significantly reduce
renal uptake. High renal uptake of conventional folate radioconjugates
can also be reduced by using antifolates without impacting tumor uptake.[49] In the present study, the lower amount of renal
and bladder uptake in the FMT images versus PET images during the
same week greatly improved the quality of the images around these
organs. The molecular structure of the FR680 tracer is proprietary,
and therefore, we do not know how uptake in the normal tissues was
minimized.Third, MRI has superior anatomical resolution to
PET and FMT. However,
the lack of a useful FR-targeted MRI reporter limited the detection
of tumor to 4 weeks post-tumor implantation compared to 2 weeks for
PET and FMT. Nevertheless, MRI can also provide valuable structural
and functional information in the early stages of tumors that are
detected using PET/CT or optical. Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI)
MRI may be useful for detecting ovarian tumors in vivo based on the reduced apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values
in the tumor relative to normal tissues.[50] However, DWI is vulnerable to physiological motion present in the
abdomen.[51] The employment of FR-targeted
fluorescence and PET imaging agents in combination with MRI (e.g.,
PET/MRI) can lead to higher sensitivity than each modality, potentially
resulting in the diagnosis of “low volume,” early stage
EOC.[52]The overexpression of MUC1
and FRα in most ovarian cancers
combined with their limited expression in healthy tissues make them
an attractive tumor-associated molecular target in imaging and therapy.
Noninvasive imaging of FRα+ cells using highly selective and
specific folate conjugates and sensitive molecular imaging will be
of great utility in clinical ovarian cancer management. The results
of this study make a strong case for multimodal imaging in preclinical
ovarian cancer models. Moreover, we have demonstrated that our new
ovarian tumor model in immunocompetent mice emulates the human disease
by reliably inducing widespread i.p. tumors marked by overexpression
of FRα.
Authors: Vivechana Dixit; Jeroen Van den Bossche; Debra M Sherman; David H Thompson; Ronald P Andres Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Nikki Parker; Mary Jo Turk; Elaine Westrick; Jeffrey D Lewis; Philip S Low; Christopher P Leamon Journal: Anal Biochem Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 3.365
Authors: Stig Palm; Richard M Enmon; Cornelia Matei; Katherine S Kolbert; Su Xu; Pat B Zanzonico; Ronald L Finn; Jason A Koutcher; Steven M Larson; George Sgouros Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ronald E Fisher; Barry A Siegel; Steven L Edell; Nelson M Oyesiku; David E Morgenstern; Richard A Messmann; Robert J Amato Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Gerardo J Ramírez-Nava; Clara L Santos-Cuevas; Isaac Chairez; Liliana Aranda-Lara Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Amanda J Boyle; Junchao Tong; Sami S Zoghbi; Victor W Pike; Robert B Innis; Neil Vasdev Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jie Li; Shu Yao; Kai Wang; Zaijun Lu; Xuantao Su; Li Li; Cunzhong Yuan; Jinbo Feng; Shi Yan; Beihua Kong; Kun Song Journal: Cancer Sci Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 6.716