| Literature DB >> 25535727 |
J Cebulla1, E M Huuse2, K Pettersen3, A van der Veen4, E Kim5, S Andersen6, W S Prestvik7, A M Bofin8, A P Pathak9, G Bjørkøy6, T F Bathen1, S A Moestue2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) pathway is an attractive therapeutic target. However, difficulty in predicting therapeutic response limits the clinical implementation of PI3K inhibitors. This study evaluates the utility of clinically relevant magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers for noninvasively assessing the in vivo response to the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in two ovarian cancer models with differential PI3K pathway activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25535727 PMCID: PMC4453650 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1Study design showing group sizes, treatment time points and imaging time points. (A) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed for all mice on day 0 after which they were randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. The mice in the treatment group received 65 mg kg−1 BEZ235 on three consecutive days (‘Tx' indicates administration of drug). After the last treatment on day 3, the mice were imaged again using MRI after which they were killed and the tumours were excised for histology. (B) For μCT the mice were randomly assigned to treatment and control groups and treated in the same way as the mice that underwent MRI. After the treatment on day 3, the mice were perfused with Microfil and the tumours were harvested for ex vivo μCT.
Figure 2Levels of activated Akt are elevated in TOV-21G cells and decrease in xenografts after BEZ235 treatment, whereas the levels are low in TOV-112D cells and unchanged in xenografts by treatment. (A) Immunoblots show that levels of pAkt (Ser473) are higher in cell extracts from untreated TOV-21G compared with TOV-112D. The level of β-actin served as a control for protein loading. (B) Levels of p-S6 (Ser 235/236) and total S6 in cell extracts from untreated cells are higher in TOV-21G cells compared with TOV-112D. Numbers indicate relative protein levels adjusted for loading. (C) Immunostaining of tissue sections shows that pAkt levels are lower in BEZ235-treated TOV-21G xenografts compared with controls. The TOV-112D cells have low levels in pAkt that are unchanged by treatment. Adjacent tumour sections for each tumour served as negative (neg.) controls and displayed a very low signal intensity. The scale bars represent 1 mm.
Figure 3Immunohistochemistry and changes in tumour volume and ADC indicate a cellular response to treatment of the TOV-21G xenografts. (A) Haematoxylin–eosin–saffron (HES) staining of tumour sections visualises an overall lighter cytoplasmic stain for the treated TOV-21G xenograft compared with the control, whereas there is no obvious difference between treated and control TOV-112D xenografts. In the high-magnification image, the tissue of the TOV-21G xenograft shows cytoplasmic vacuolisation and a looser structure than the control tissue. The Ki-67 staining of TOV-21G xenografts indicates that both cancer and stromal cells are highly proliferating. In treated xenografts, the fraction of proliferating cells appears markedly reduced. In TOV-112D xenografts, there is no conspicuous difference in the fraction of proliferating cells between treated and control xenografts. The images were taken at × 4 and × 40 magnification and the scale bars represent 1 mm and 0.1 mm, respectively. The × 40 fields were captured at ∼0.5 mm distance from the tumour rim. (B) Change in relative tumour volume for treatment (tx) and control (ctrl) groups of both TOV-21G and TOV-112D xenografts. (C and D) Pooled histograms of ADC values in the treatment and control TOV-21G groups for day 0 and day 3. Independent sample t-test BEZ235 vs control: ###P<0.001. Paired sample t-test day 0 vs day 3: **P<0.01.
Changes in tumour volume, DW-MRI and DCE-MRI parameters between day 0 and day 3 in control and treated TOV-21G and TOV-112D xenografts
| Normalised volume (to day 0) | 0.26±0.04 | −0.15±0.09 | 0.39±0.29 | 0.17±0.13 | 0.224 | |
| Median ADC ( × 10−6 mm2 s−1) | −1.6±50 | 140±35 | 0.2±13.7 | −5.9±26 | 0.675 | |
| ADC skewness | 0.2±0.1 | −1.0±0.6 | 0.8±2.7 | 0.0±2.1 | 0.587 | |
| ADC kurtosis | 0.6±0.3 | −4.5±2.7 | 17.6±38.1 | 11.5±23.4 | 0.736 | |
| Median Ktrans ( × 10−3 min−1) | −18±15 | 17±28 | 0.050 | −15±8 | 2±14 | 0.060 |
| Median ve ( × 10−3) | −33±12 | 131±70 | −8±6 | 19±16 | ||
| Median vp ( × 10−3) | −6.4±7.9 | 14.1±20.4 | 0.091 | −0.1±3.8 | 0.4±5.6 | 0.875 |
| Median RSI1 min | −0.4±0.4 | 0.6±0.7 | −0.2±0.2 | 0.1±0.2 | ||
| Median AUC1 min a.u. | −7.1±6.4 | 15.4±17.2 | −11 .1±7.3 | 3.8±3.0 | ||
| FEV1 min (%) | −14±11 | 13±15 | −14±17 | 11±16 | ||
Abbreviations: ADC=apparent diffusion coefficient; a.u.=arbitrary units; AUC1min=area under enhancement curve 1 min after injection; DCE-MRI=dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; DW-MRI=diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; FEV1 min=fraction of enhancing voxels (by 50% after 1 min); Ktrans=volume transfer constant; RSI1 min=relative signal intensity 1 min after injection; ve=extravascular extracellular space per unit volume of tissue; vp=blood plasma fraction.
Values are given as group mean change±s.d. The P-values are derived from independent sample t-tests between the change of each parameter in the control and treatment groups.
Nonequal variances (Levene's test).
Excluding voxels for which RSI <50%.
N=7 because of unsuccessful contrast agent injection in one tumour.
N=7 because of higher contrast agent injection in one tumour.
Bold values signifies P-value <0.05.
Figure 4Parametric maps of a TOV-21G and TOV-112D xenograft of the same animal before and after treatment. (A–D) Anatomical images; (E–H) ADC maps; (I–L) ve maps; (M–P) Ktrans maps; (Q and R) HES-stained sections matching the post-treatment MRI parametric maps. The maps show that ADC and ve increased throughout the tumour after treatment in the TOV-21G xenografts but not in TOV-112D xenografts. Ktrans did not change in either tumour.
Figure 5Treated TOV-21G xenografts can be well separated from the control group based on changes in median ADC and v Change in median ve vs change in median ADC for control and treatment groups of TOV-21G and TOV-112D xenografts.
Figure 6Treatment-induced increases in AUC (A) Change in AUC1 min, (B) change in FEV1 min and (C) change in Ktrans for treatment and control groups of both TOV-21G and TOV-112D xenografts. Independent sample t-test BEZ235 (Tx) vs control: #P<0.05, ##P<0.01. Paired sample t-test day 0 vs day 3: *P<0.05.
Figure 7Data on vascular morphology derived from (A–D) Mean values±s.d. of FBV, mean vessel density, median vessel length and median radius for treated and untreated TOV-112D (n=3 each) and TOV-21G (n=4 each) xenografts. (E) Maximum intensity projection of a 2-mm-thick tumour slice of the raw μCT data of a TOV-112D xenograft.