Literature DB >> 25535374

Evolutionary meandering of intermolecular interactions along the drift barrier.

Michael Lynch1, Kyle Hagner2.   

Abstract

Many cellular functions depend on highly specific intermolecular interactions, for example transcription factors and their DNA binding sites, microRNAs and their RNA binding sites, the interfaces between heterodimeric protein molecules, the stems in RNA molecules, and kinases and their response regulators in signal-transduction systems. Despite the need for complementarity between interacting partners, such pairwise systems seem to be capable of high levels of evolutionary divergence, even when subject to strong selection. Such behavior is a consequence of the diminishing advantages of increasing binding affinity between partners, the multiplicity of evolutionary pathways between selectively equivalent alternatives, and the stochastic nature of evolutionary processes. Because mutation pressure toward reduced affinity conflicts with selective pressure for greater interaction, situations can arise in which the expected distribution of the degree of matching between interacting partners is bimodal, even in the face of constant selection. Although biomolecules with larger numbers of interacting partners are subject to increased levels of evolutionary conservation, their more numerous partners need not converge on a single sequence motif or be increasingly constrained in more complex systems. These results suggest that most phylogenetic differences in the sequences of binding interfaces are not the result of adaptive fine tuning but a simple consequence of random genetic drift.

Keywords:  cellular evolution; coevolution; molecular interaction; random genetic drift; transcription

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25535374      PMCID: PMC4291652          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1421641112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  62 in total

1.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population.

Authors:  M KIMURA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Using deep sequencing to characterize the biophysical mechanism of a transcriptional regulatory sequence.

Authors:  Justin B Kinney; Anand Murugan; Curtis G Callan; Edward C Cox
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evolution of branched regulatory genetic pathways: directional selection on pleiotropic loci accelerates developmental system drift.

Authors:  Norman A Johnson; Adam H Porter
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Energy-dependent fitness: a quantitative model for the evolution of yeast transcription factor binding sites.

Authors:  Ville Mustonen; Justin Kinney; Curtis G Callan; Michael Lässig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolutionary diversification of the multimeric states of proteins.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Drift-barrier hypothesis and mutation-rate evolution.

Authors:  Way Sung; Matthew S Ackerman; Samuel F Miller; Thomas G Doak; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Crosstalk and the evolution of specificity in two-component signaling.

Authors:  Michael A Rowland; Eric J Deeds
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Lambda repressor recognizes the approximately 2-fold symmetric half-operator sequences asymmetrically.

Authors:  A Sarai; Y Takeda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Analysis of the sequence-specific interactions between Cro repressor and operator DNA by systematic base substitution experiments.

Authors:  Y Takeda; A Sarai; V M Rivera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Stability and response of polygenic traits to stabilizing selection and mutation.

Authors:  Harold P de Vladar; Nick Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  24 in total

1.  Argonaute CLIP Defines a Deregulated miR-122-Bound Transcriptome that Correlates with Patient Survival in Human Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph M Luna; Juan M Barajas; Kun-Yu Teng; Hui-Lung Sun; Michael J Moore; Charles M Rice; Robert B Darnell; Kalpana Ghoshal
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  The SPOR Domain, a Widely Conserved Peptidoglycan Binding Domain That Targets Proteins to the Site of Cell Division.

Authors:  Atsushi Yahashiri; Matthew A Jorgenson; David S Weiss
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Regulatory network structure determines patterns of intermolecular epistasis.

Authors:  Mato Lagator; Srdjan Sarikas; Hande Acar; Jonathan P Bollback; Călin C Guet
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 4.  Musings on mechanism: quest for a quark theory of proteins?

Authors:  Rob Phillips
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  ChIP-ping the branches of the tree: functional genomics and the evolution of eukaryotic gene regulation.

Authors:  Georgi K Marinov; Anshul Kundaje
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  The evolutionary scaling of cellular traits imposed by the drift barrier.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Monod-Wyman-Changeux Analysis of Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Mutants.

Authors:  Tal Einav; Rob Phillips
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 8.  Figure 1 Theory Meets Figure 2 Experiments in the Study of Gene Expression.

Authors:  Rob Phillips; Nathan M Belliveau; Griffin Chure; Hernan G Garcia; Manuel Razo-Mejia; Clarissa Scholes
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 12.981

9.  How does epistasis influence the response to selection?

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 10.  Evolution in small steps and giant leaps.

Authors:  Noah K Whiteman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.171

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.