| Literature DB >> 25534246 |
Aaron B A Shafer1, Jochen B W Wolf2, Paulo C Alves3, Linnea Bergström4, Michael W Bruford5, Ioana Brännström4, Guy Colling6, Love Dalén7, Luc De Meester8, Robert Ekblom4, Katie D Fawcett9, Simone Fior10, Mehrdad Hajibabaei11, Jason A Hill12, A Rus Hoezel13, Jacob Höglund4, Evelyn L Jensen14, Johannes Krause15, Torsten N Kristensen16, Michael Krützen17, John K McKay18, Anita J Norman19, Rob Ogden20, E Martin Österling21, N Joop Ouborg22, John Piccolo21, Danijela Popović23, Craig R Primmer24, Floyd A Reed25, Marie Roumet10, Jordi Salmona26, Tamara Schenekar27, Michael K Schwartz28, Gernot Segelbacher29, Helen Senn20, Jens Thaulow30, Mia Valtonen31, Andrew Veale14, Philippine Vergeer32, Nagarjun Vijay4, Carles Vilà33, Matthias Weissensteiner4, Lovisa Wennerström12, Christopher W Wheat12, Piotr Zieliński34.
Abstract
The global loss of biodiversity continues at an alarming rate. Genomic approaches have been suggested as a promising tool for conservation practice as scaling up to genome-wide data can improve traditional conservation genetic inferences and provide qualitatively novel insights. However, the generation of genomic data and subsequent analyses and interpretations remain challenging and largely confined to academic research in ecology and evolution. This generates a gap between basic research and applicable solutions for conservation managers faced with multifaceted problems. Before the real-world conservation potential of genomic research can be realized, we suggest that current infrastructures need to be modified, methods must mature, analytical pipelines need to be developed, and successful case studies must be disseminated to practitioners.Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25534246 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Ecol Evol ISSN: 0169-5347 Impact factor: 17.712