Literature DB >> 25534246

Genomics and the challenging translation into conservation practice.

Aaron B A Shafer1, Jochen B W Wolf2, Paulo C Alves3, Linnea Bergström4, Michael W Bruford5, Ioana Brännström4, Guy Colling6, Love Dalén7, Luc De Meester8, Robert Ekblom4, Katie D Fawcett9, Simone Fior10, Mehrdad Hajibabaei11, Jason A Hill12, A Rus Hoezel13, Jacob Höglund4, Evelyn L Jensen14, Johannes Krause15, Torsten N Kristensen16, Michael Krützen17, John K McKay18, Anita J Norman19, Rob Ogden20, E Martin Österling21, N Joop Ouborg22, John Piccolo21, Danijela Popović23, Craig R Primmer24, Floyd A Reed25, Marie Roumet10, Jordi Salmona26, Tamara Schenekar27, Michael K Schwartz28, Gernot Segelbacher29, Helen Senn20, Jens Thaulow30, Mia Valtonen31, Andrew Veale14, Philippine Vergeer32, Nagarjun Vijay4, Carles Vilà33, Matthias Weissensteiner4, Lovisa Wennerström12, Christopher W Wheat12, Piotr Zieliński34.   

Abstract

The global loss of biodiversity continues at an alarming rate. Genomic approaches have been suggested as a promising tool for conservation practice as scaling up to genome-wide data can improve traditional conservation genetic inferences and provide qualitatively novel insights. However, the generation of genomic data and subsequent analyses and interpretations remain challenging and largely confined to academic research in ecology and evolution. This generates a gap between basic research and applicable solutions for conservation managers faced with multifaceted problems. Before the real-world conservation potential of genomic research can be realized, we suggest that current infrastructures need to be modified, methods must mature, analytical pipelines need to be developed, and successful case studies must be disseminated to practitioners.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25534246     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  89 in total

1.  Demographic history, current expansion and future management challenges of wild boar populations in the Balkans and Europe.

Authors:  N Veličković; E Ferreira; M Djan; M Ernst; D Obreht Vidaković; A Monaco; C Fonseca
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Anthropogenic habitat alteration leads to rapid loss of adaptive variation and restoration potential in wild salmon populations.

Authors:  Tasha Q Thompson; M Renee Bellinger; Sean M O'Rourke; Daniel J Prince; Alexander E Stevenson; Antonia T Rodrigues; Matthew R Sloat; Camilla F Speller; Dongya Y Yang; Virginia L Butler; Michael A Banks; Michael R Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  UNVEILing connections between genotype, phenotype, and fitness in natural populations.

Authors:  Thomas C Nelson; Matthew R Jones; Jonathan P Velotta; Abhilesh S Dhawanjewar; Rena M Schweizer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-05-05       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Applying genomic data in wildlife monitoring: Development guidelines for genotyping degraded samples with reduced single nucleotide polymorphism panels.

Authors:  Alina von Thaden; Carsten Nowak; Annika Tiesmeyer; Tobias E Reiners; Paulo C Alves; Leslie A Lyons; Federica Mattucci; Ettore Randi; Margherita Cragnolini; José Galián; Zsolt Hegyeli; Andrew C Kitchener; Clotilde Lambinet; José M Lucas; Thomas Mölich; Luana Ramos; Vinciane Schockert; Berardino Cocchiararo
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  Climate change is predicted to disrupt patterns of local adaptation in wild and cultivated maize.

Authors:  Jonás A Aguirre-Liguori; Santiago Ramírez-Barahona; Peter Tiffin; Luis E Eguiarte
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Estimation of contemporary effective population size and population declines using RAD sequence data.

Authors:  Schyler O Nunziata; David W Weisrock
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  ENGAGING NATIVE AMERICANS IN GENOMICS RESEARCH.

Authors:  Ripan S Malhi; Alyssa Bader
Journal:  Am Anthropol       Date:  2015-12-04

8.  Strong trans-Pacific break and local conservation units in the Galapagos shark (Carcharhinus galapagensis) revealed by genome-wide cytonuclear markers.

Authors:  Diana A Pazmiño; Gregory E Maes; Madeline E Green; Colin A Simpfendorfer; E Mauricio Hoyos-Padilla; Clinton J A Duffy; Carl G Meyer; Sven E Kerwath; Pelayo Salinas-de-León; Lynne van Herwerden
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Inferring the Demographic History of Inbred Species from Genome-Wide SNP Frequency Data.

Authors:  Paul D Blischak; Michael S Barker; Ryan N Gutenkunst
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Rapid isolation and characterization of microsatellites in the critically endangered mountain bongo (Tragelaphus eurycerus isaaci).

Authors:  Fraser J Combe; Evelyn Taylor-Cox; Graeme Fox; Tommy Sandri; Nick Davis; Martin J Jones; Bradley Cain; David Mallon; W Edwin Harris
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.