Literature DB >> 25534163

Sonographic weight estimation in fetal macrosomia: influence of the time interval between estimation and delivery.

F Faschingbauer1, U Dammer, E Raabe, M Schneider, C Faschingbauer, M Schmid, A Mayr, R L Schild, M W Beckmann, S Kehl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the time interval between examination and delivery on the accuracy of sonographic weight estimation (WE) in fetal macrosomia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 896 singleton pregnancies (birth weight > 4,000 g) with a total of 1,281 sonographic weight estimations were included in this retrospective cohort study. Fetuses were divided into six groups with regard to the time interval between estimation and delivery: group 1: scan-to-delivery interval: 0 days; group 2: scan-to-delivery interval: 1-3 days; group 3: scan-to-delivery interval: 4-7 days; group 4: scan-to-delivery interval: 8-14 days; group 5: scan-to-delivery interval: 15-21 days; group 6: scan-to-delivery interval: 22-42 days. The accuracy of WE was compared between five commonly used formulas using means of percentage errors (MPE), random error, medians of absolute percentage errors (MAPE), and proportions of estimates within 10 % of actual birth weight.
RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the time interval groups with regard to MAPE and MPE values (p < 0.001). All formulas showed a systematic underestimation of fetal weight (negative MPEs) (p < 0.05). MPE values were closest to zero in time interval group 1 and 2. From group 3 to 6, a continuous decrease was observed. The lowest MAPE was found with the Merz formula in group 1 and 2. Values increased continuously from group 3 to 6. Differences between time interval group one and three did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: WE in fetal macrosomia shows the best results when examinations are performed within 7 days before delivery, using the formula of Merz et al. Accuracy significantly decreases after this time period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25534163     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3604-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  2 in total

1.  Second trimester maternal serum triple screening marker levels in normal twin and singleton pregnancies.

Authors:  Feng Ren; Y U Hu; Huan Zhou; Wen-Ying Zhu; L I Jia; Jing-Jing Xu; Jing Xue
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2016-02-24

2.  Does the Porter formula hold its promise? A weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses put to the test.

Authors:  Christoph Weiss; Sabine Enengl; Simon Hermann Enzelsberger; Richard Bernhard Mayer; Peter Oppelt
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 2.344

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.