Literature DB >> 25533857

Surgical treatment of sacral chordoma: prognostic variables for local recurrence and overall survival.

Péter Pál Varga1, Zsolt Szövérfi, Charles G Fisher, Stefano Boriani, Ziya L Gokaslan, Mark B Dekutoski, Dean Chou, Nasir A Quraishi, Jeremy J Reynolds, Alessandro Luzzati, Richard Williams, Michael G Fehlings, Niccole M Germscheid, Aron Lazary, Laurence D Rhines.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sacral chordomas (SC) are rare, locally invasive, malignant neoplasms. Despite surgical resection and adjuvant therapies, local recurrence (LR) is common and overall survival (OS) is poor. The objective of this study was to identify prognostic factors that have an impact on the local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and OS of patients with SC.
METHODS: Utilizing the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor multicenter ambispective database, surgically treated SC cases were identified. Cox regression modeling was used to assess the effect of several clinically relevant variables on OS and LRFS.
RESULTS: A total of 167 patients with surgically treated SC were identified. The male/female ratio was 98/69 with a mean age of 57 ± 15 years at the time of surgery. The LR was 35% (n = 57), death occurred in 30% of patients (n = 50) during the study period. The median OS was 6 years post-surgery and LRFS was 4 years. In the univariate analysis, previous tumor surgery at the same site (P = 0.002), intralesional resection (P < 0.001), and larger tumor volume (P = 0.030) were significantly associated with LR. Increasing age (P < 0.001) and a preoperative motor deficit of C or D (P = 0.003) were significantly associated with poor OS, and nerve root sacrifice showed a trend towards significance (P = 0.088). In the multivariate models, previous surgery and intralesional resection were significantly related to LR, while increasing age and motor deficit of C or D were associated with poor OS.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified two predictive variables for LRFS (previous tumor surgery and type of surgical resection) and two for OS (age and impaired motor function) in surgically treated SC patients. Our results indicate that en bloc resection reduces LR but does not influence OS. However, this was likely due to short follow-up (3.2 years).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25533857     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3728-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  31 in total

1.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Primary Spinal Tumor Mortality Score (PSTMS): a novel scoring system for predicting poor survival.

Authors:  Zsolt Szövérfi; Aron Lazary; Árpád Bozsódi; István Klemencsics; Péter E Éltes; Péter Pál Varga
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 3.  Multidisciplinary management of primary tumors of the vertebral column.

Authors:  Wesley Hsu; Thomas A Kosztowski; Hasan A Zaidi; Michael Dorsi; Ziya L Gokaslan; Jean-Paul Wolinsky
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-06-23

4.  Oncologic and functional outcome following sacrectomy for sacral chordoma.

Authors:  Christopher A Hulen; H Thomas Temple; William P Fox; Andrew A Sama; Barth A Green; Frank J Eismont
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Operative management of sacral chordoma.

Authors:  Bruno Fuchs; Ian D Dickey; Michael J Yaszemski; Carrie Y Inwards; Franklin H Sim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Infections in surgery of primary tumors of the sacrum.

Authors:  Pietro Ruggieri; Andrea Angelini; Elisa Pala; Mario Mercuri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Primary vertebral tumors: a review of epidemiologic, histological and imaging findings, part II: locally aggressive and malignant tumors.

Authors:  Alexander E Ropper; Kevin S Cahill; John W Hanna; Edward F McCarthy; Ziya L Gokaslan; John H Chi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 8.  Current management of sacral chordoma.

Authors:  Daryl R Fourney; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.047

9.  The surgical management of sacral chordomas.

Authors:  Joseph H Schwab; John H Healey; Peter Rose; Jorge Casas-Ganem; Patrick J Boland
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A novel scientific model for rare and often neglected neoplastic conditions.

Authors:  Charles G Fisher; Tony Goldschlager; Stefano Boriani; Peter Pal Varga; Michael G Fehlings; Mark H Bilsky; Mark B Dekutoski; Alessandro Luzzati; Richard P Williams; Sigurd Berven; Dean Chou; Jeremy J Reynolds; Nasir A Quraishi; Laurence D Rhines; Chetan Bettegowda; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2013-10
View more
  29 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor concerning "Surgical treatment of sacral chordoma: survival and prognostic factors" by C. Ruosi et al. (Eur Spine J; 2015; 24(Suppl 7):S912-S917.

Authors:  Ming-Xiang Zou; Guo-Hua Lv; Xiao-Bin Wang; Jing Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Image guidance in spine tumor surgery.

Authors:  Patrick D Kelly; Scott L Zuckerman; Yoshiya Yamada; Eric Lis; Mark H Bilsky; Ilya Laufer; Ori Barzilai
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Whole-transcriptome analysis of chordoma of the skull base.

Authors:  Diana Bell; Shaan M Raza; Achim H Bell; Gregory N Fuller; Franco DeMonte
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Surgical Management of Sacral Chordomas: Illustrative Cases and Current Management Paradigms.

Authors:  Arjun V Pendharkar; Allen L Ho; Eric S Sussman; Atman Desai
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-08-12

5.  The use of preoperative imaging in the treatment of sacral chordomas.

Authors:  Scott L Zuckerman; Laurence D Rhines
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

6.  Spinal column chordoma: prognostic significance of clinical variables and T (brachyury) gene SNP rs2305089 for local recurrence and overall survival.

Authors:  Chetan Bettegowda; Stephen Yip; Sheng-Fu Larry Lo; Charles G Fisher; Stefano Boriani; Laurence D Rhines; Joanna Y Wang; Aron Lazary; Marco Gambarotti; Wei-Lien Wang; Alessandro Luzzati; Mark B Dekutoski; Mark H Bilsky; Dean Chou; Michael G Fehlings; Edward F McCarthy; Nasir A Quraishi; Jeremy J Reynolds; Daniel M Sciubba; Richard P Williams; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Patricia L Zadnik; Ming Zhang; Niccole M Germscheid; Vasiliki Kalampoki; Peter Pal Varga; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Recurrence and survival factors analysis of 171 cases of sacral chordoma in a single institute.

Authors:  Yongkun Yang; Xiaohui Niu; Yuan Li; Weifeng Liu; Hairong Xu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  What Are the Conditional Survival and Functional Outcomes After Surgical Treatment of 115 Patients With Sacral Chordoma?

Authors:  Tao Ji; Wei Guo; Rongli Yang; Xiaodong Tang; Yifei Wang; Lin Huang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Surgical treatment of sacral chordoma: survival and prognostic factors.

Authors:  C Ruosi; G Colella; S L Di Donato; F Granata; M G Di Salvatore; F Fazioli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Sacral chordoma: do the width of surgical margin and the use of photon/proton radiotherapy affect local disease control?

Authors:  Tomohiro Fujiwara; Yusuke Tsuda; Jonathan Stevenson; Michael Parry; Lee Jeys
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.