Literature DB >> 25533587

Performance of a novel left ventricular lead with short bipolar spacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: primary results of the Attain Performa quadripolar left ventricular lead study.

George H Crossley1, Mauro Biffi2, Ben Johnson3, Albert Lin4, Daniel Gras5, Azlan Hussin6, Allen Cuffio7, Jack L Collier8, Mikhael El-Chami9, Shelby Li10, Keith Holloman10, Derek V Exner11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Medtronic Attain Performa quadripolar leads provide 16 pacing vectors with steroid on every electrode. This includes a short bipolar configuration between the middle 2 electrodes.
OBJECTIVE: A prospective clinical study was conducted to investigate the safety and effectiveness of these new leads in 27 countries.
METHODS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator candidates were enrolled (mean age 68 years; 71% men). All implanted subjects were followed at 1, 3, and 6 months postimplant. Pacing capture threshold (PCT) values were measured at each visit. Adverse events were reported upon occurrence.
RESULTS: Of 1124 subjects in whom a left ventricular (LV) lead was attempted, 1097 (97.6%) were successfully implanted with an Attain Performa lead. Thirty-six LV lead-related complications were reported (the 6-month LV lead-related complication-free survival rate was 96.9%). Phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) occurred in 81 subjects (7.2%), with only 3 (0.3%) requiring surgical intervention. At 6 months, the mean PCT at the programmed vector was (1.1 ± 0.8) V and 94.4% of subjects had a PCT of ≤2.5 V. All 16 programming polarities were used in at least 1 patient, and short bipolar configurations were used in 17% of subjects.
CONCLUSION: This large multicenter study demonstrated a high success rate for the implantation of Attain Performa quadripolar LV leads with a low complication rate. The PCT was low and stable over time. A low rate of postimplantation PNS was observed, and cases of PNS were readily resolved with reprogramming. Nonstandard vectors were often used for LV pacing.
Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Congestive heart failure; Defibrillator; Quadripolar lead

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25533587     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  9 in total

1.  Against all odds: Targeted pacing site for resynchronization therapy by venoplasty and active fixation lead.

Authors:  Matteo Ziacchi; Giuseppe Boriani; Mauro Biffi
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-10-26

2.  Is ventricular sensing always right, when it is left?

Authors:  Mauro Biffi; Giulia de Zan; Giulia Massaro; Andrea Angeletti; Cristian Martignani; Giuseppe Boriani; Igor Diemberger; Matteo Ziacchi
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Determinants of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  John D Allison; Yitschak Biton; Theofanie Mela
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2022-05-15

4.  Clinical outcome of left ventricular multipoint pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Hu; Lihui Zheng; Ligang Ding; Zhongpeng Du; Erpeng Liang; Lingmin Wu; Gang Chen; Xiaohan Fan; Yan Yao; Yu Jiang
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Quadripolar Versus Bipolar Left Ventricular Leads for Cardiac Resynchronization Defibrillator Therapy in a Large, Multicenter UK Registry.

Authors:  Jonathan M Behar; Hui Men Selina Chin; Steve Fearn; Julian O M Ormerod; James Gamble; Paul W X Foley; Julian Bostock; Simon Claridge; Tom Jackson; Manav Sohal; Antonios P Antoniadis; Reza Razavi; Tim R Betts; Neil Herring; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-02

6.  Lead related complications in quadripolar versus bipolar left ventricular leads.

Authors:  Shasank Rijal; Jonathan Wolfe; Rohit Rattan; Asad Durrani; Andrew D Althouse; Oscar C Marroquin; Sandeep Jain; Suresh Mulukutla; Samir Saba
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2016-10-24

7.  For LV pacing, four is greater than two.

Authors:  Matthew R Reynolds; Kashif N Chaudhry
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2017-01-09

8.  Performance of an active fixation bipolar left ventricular lead vs passive fixation quadripolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy, a randomized trial.

Authors:  Havard Keilegavlen; Peter Schuster; Thomas Hovstad; Svein Faerestrand
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2020-11-08

9.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comparison among left ventricular bipolar, quadripolar and active fixation leads.

Authors:  M Ziacchi; I Diemberger; A Corzani; C Martignani; A Mazzotti; G Massaro; C Valzania; C Rapezzi; G Boriani; M Biffi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.