Literature DB >> 2553335

A placebo-controlled, blind comparison of nedocromil sodium and beclomethasone dipropionate in bronchial asthma.

K C Bergmann1, C P Bauer, A Overlack.   

Abstract

A multi-centre, randomized, blind comparative group study was carried out in 202 adult patients, who had suffered from asthma for at least 2 years, to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of maintenance treatment with either 4 mg nedocromil sodium 4-times daily, 0.1 mg beclomethasone dipropionate 4-times daily or 2 puffs of placebo 4-times daily, given by inhalation. Lung function (FEV1 and sRaw) measurements were made at the beginning and end of a 2-week baseline period and then after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment: assessment were also made of asthma severity. Patients recorded daily on diary cards details of morning and evening PEFR, usage of inhaled bronchodilators, severity of dyspnoea, cough and morning tightness. The results showed that, compared with placebo, both nedocromil sodium and beclomethasone dipropionate-treated patients showed an improvement in FEV1 and a reduction in sRaw values: PEFR increased slightly in all three groups. There was an improvement in asthma severity, diminished rate of dyspnoea and cough, and reduced usage of inhaled bronchodilators in patients receiving active treatment but not in those on placebo. Overall assessment of treatment efficacy by both investigators and patients showed that opinions were significantly in favour of active treatment over placebo. Treatment was well tolerated and no serious side-effects were reported. It was concluded that at the dosages used nedocromil sodium was comparable with and equivalent to inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate in nearly all of the parameters assessed, and both drugs were superior to placebo in the maintenance treatment of asthma in adult patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2553335     DOI: 10.1185/03007998909110465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  7 in total

1.  Treating children with asthma. A review of drug therapies.

Authors:  H Kalister
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-06

Review 2.  Canadian Asthma Consensus Report, 1999. Canadian Asthma Consensus Group.

Authors:  L P Boulet; A Becker; D Bérubé; R Beveridge; P Ernst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-11-30       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  North of England evidence based guidelines development project: summary version of evidence based guideline for the primary care management in adults.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-23

Review 4.  Nedocromil sodium. An updated review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in asthma.

Authors:  R N Brogden; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Double blind, placebo controlled study of nedocromil sodium in asthma.

Authors:  L Armenio; G Baldini; M Bardare; A Boner; R Burgio; G Cavagni; M La Rosa; F Marcucci; M Miraglia del Giudice; M R Pulejo
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 6.  Nedocromil sodium for chronic asthma in children.

Authors:  A V Sridhar; M McKean
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

7.  Corticosteroid-sparing effect of chromoglycate sodium and nedocromil.

Authors:  A F Capristo; M M Del Giudice; C Alfaro; N Maiello
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.711

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.