Literature DB >> 25533304

Effect of the preparation methods on architecture, crystallinity, hydrolytic degradation, bioactivity, and biocompatibility of PCL/bioglass composite scaffolds.

Michal Dziadek1, Justyna Pawlik1, Elzbieta Menaszek2, Ewa Stodolak-Zych3, Katarzyna Cholewa-Kowalska1.   

Abstract

In this study, two different composition gel derived silica-rich (S2) or calcium-rich (A2) bioactive glasses (SBG) from a basic CaO-P2 O5 -SiO2 system were incorporated into poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) matrix to obtain novel bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. The composites were fabricated in the form of highly porous 3D scaffolds using following preparation methods: solvent casting particulate leaching (SCPL), solid-liquid phase separation, phase inversion (PI). Scaffolds containing 21% vol. of each bioactive glass were characterized for architecture, crystallinity, hydrolytic degradation, surface bioactivity, and cellular response. Results indicated that the use of different preparation methods leads to obtain highly porous (60-90%) materials with differentiated morphology: pore shape, size, and distributions. Thermal analysis (DSC) showed that the preparation method of materials and addition of bioactive glass particles into polymer matrix induced the changes of PCL crystallinity. Composites obtained by SCPL and PI method containing A2 SBG rapidly formed a hydroxyapatite calcium phosphate surface layer after incubation in SBF. Bioactive glasses used as filler in composite scaffolds could neutralize the released acidic by-products of the polymer degradation. Preliminary in vitro biological studies of the composites in contact with osteoblastic cells showed good biocompatibility of the obtained materials. Addition of bioactive glass into the PCL matrix promotes mineralization estimated on the basis of the ALP activity. These results suggest that through a process of selection appropriate methods of preparation and bioglass composition it is possible to design and obtain porous materials with suitable properties for regeneration of bone tissue.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioactive material; bioresorbable; composite/hard tissue; porous; tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25533304     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bioresorbable Scaffold-Based Controlled Drug Delivery for Restenosis.

Authors:  Belay Tesfamariam
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Fast-degrading PLA/ORMOGLASS fibrous composite scaffold leads to a calcium-rich angiogenic environment.

Authors:  Nadège Sachot; Agata Roguska; Josep Anton Planell; Malgorzata Lewandowska; Elisabeth Engel; Oscar Castaño
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-07-11

3.  A Multimaterial Scaffold With Tunable Properties: Toward Bone Tissue Repair.

Authors:  Pei Feng; Ping Wu; Chengde Gao; Youwen Yang; Wang Guo; Wenjing Yang; Cijun Shuai
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 4.  A comprehensive review of biodegradable synthetic polymer-ceramic composites and their manufacture for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Mona Alizadeh-Osgouei; Yuncang Li; Cuie Wen
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2018-11-27

5.  Molecular Indicators of Biomaterials Osteoinductivity - Cell Migration, BMP Production and Signalling Turns a Key.

Authors:  Krzysztof Łukowicz; Barbara Zagrajczuk; Jarosław Wieczorek; Katarzyna Millan-Ciesielska; Izabela Polkowska; Katarzyna Cholewa-Kowalska; Anna M Osyczka
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 6.  Effect of microporosity on scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Ke Zhang; Yubo Fan; Nicholas Dunne; Xiaoming Li
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2018-02-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.