Niels C Pedersen1, Chrissy Eckstrand2, Hongwei Liu3, Christian Leutenegger4, Brian Murphy2. 1. Center for Companion Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. Electronic address: ncpedersen@ucdavis.edu. 2. Department Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. 3. Center for Companion Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. 4. IDEXX Laboratories, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Abstract
Twenty specific pathogen free cats were experimentally infected with a virulent cat-passaged type I field strain of FIPV. Eighteen cats succumbed within 2-4 weeks to effusive abdominal FIP, one survived for 6 weeks, and one seroconverted without outward signs of disease. A profound drop in the absolute count of blood lymphocytes occurred around 2 weeks post-infection (p.i.) in cats with rapid disease, while the decrease was delayed in the one cat that survived for 6 weeks. The absolute lymphocyte count of the surviving cat remained within normal range. Serum antibodies as measured by indirect immunofluorescence appeared after 2 weeks p.i. and correlated with the onset of disease signs. Viral genomic RNA was either not detectable by reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) or detectable only at very low levels in terminal tissues not involved directly in the infection, including hepatic and renal parenchyma, cardiac muscle, lung or popliteal lymph node. High tissue virus loads were measured in severely affected tissues such as the omentum, mesenteric lymph nodes and spleen. High levels of viral genomic RNA were also detected in whole ascitic fluid, with the cellular fraction containing 10-1000 times more viral RNA than the supernatant. Replicating virus was strongly associated with macrophages by immunohistochemistry. Virus was usually detected at relatively low levels in feces and there was no evidence of enterocyte infection. Viral genomic RNA was not detected at the level of test sensitivity in whole blood, plasma, or the white cell fraction in terminal samples from the 19 cats that succumbed or in the single survivor. These studies reconfirmed the effect of lymphopenia on disease outcome. FIPV genomic RNA was also found to be highly macrophage associated within diseased tissues and effusions as determined by RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry but was not present in blood.
Twenty specific pathogen free cats were experimentally infected with a virulent cat-passaged type I field strain of FIPV. Eighteen cats succumbed within 2-4 weeks to effusive abdominal FIP, one survived for 6 weeks, and one seroconverted without outward signs of disease. A profound drop in the absolute count of blood lymphocytes occurred around 2 weeks post-infection (p.i.) in cats with rapid disease, while the decrease was delayed in the one cat that survived for 6 weeks. The absolute lymphocyte count of the surviving cat remained within normal range. Serum antibodies as measured by indirect immunofluorescence appeared after 2 weeks p.i. and correlated with the onset of disease signs. Viral genomic RNA was either not detectable by reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) or detectable only at very low levels in terminal tissues not involved directly in the infection, including hepatic and renal parenchyma, cardiac muscle, lung or popliteal lymph node. High tissue virus loads were measured in severely affected tissues such as the omentum, mesenteric lymph nodes and spleen. High levels of viral genomic RNA were also detected in whole ascitic fluid, with the cellular fraction containing 10-1000 times more viral RNA than the supernatant. Replicating virus was strongly associated with macrophages by immunohistochemistry. Virus was usually detected at relatively low levels in feces and there was no evidence of enterocyte infection. Viral genomic RNA was not detected at the level of test sensitivity in whole blood, plasma, or the white cell fraction in terminal samples from the 19 cats that succumbed or in the single survivor. These studies reconfirmed the effect of lymphopenia on disease outcome. FIPV genomic RNA was also found to be highly macrophage associated within diseased tissues and effusions as determined by RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry but was not present in blood.
In spite of many decades of studies on experimental FIPV infection, there is very little information on how the virus and host interact over an entire disease course. Many experimental FIPV infection studies have also been limited to the final disease outcome, e.g., the testing of vaccine candidates for efficacy or testing of various types and biotypes of feline coronavirus isolates for disease potential (Pedersen, 2009, Pedersen, 2014a). Still other experimental studies have concentrated on specific virus- or host-related inflammatory or immune responses, also measured mainly in terminally ill cats (Pedersen, 2014a). There are several longitudinal studies which have followed the entire disease course, but these studies were concerned mainly with disease signs such as fever, antibody responses and cytokine expression and not with viral loads in various tissues (Pedersen and Boyle, 1980, Weiss and Scott, 1981, Gunn-Moore et al., 1998a). Only one other temporal study has been performed on FIPV levels in peripheral blood of experimentally infectedcats (de Groot-Mijnes et al., 2005). Although the authors suggested that there was a significant viremia associated with disease, viremia was erratic, observed mainly at week one post-infection and terminally, and the levels of viral genomic RNA, even when detected, were never high.There has been a long standing belief that FIPV is not shed from the body, at least to the very high levels seen in FECVinfection or in an infectious form (Pedersen et al., 2009). FIPV does not appear to replicate in enterocytes (Chang et al., 2010, Pedersen et al., 2012), and was first associated with macrophages by electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry (Ward, 1970, Pedersen and Boyle, 1980). Dean et al. (2003) studied the distribution of FIPV by immunofluorescence at the time of death in experimentally infectedcats and also found macrophages to be heavily infected in mediastinal and mesenteric lymph nodes and spleen, with much less evidence of infection in peripheral tissues such as popliteal and cervical lymph nodes and bone marrow.Lymphopenia is a consistent feature of both naturally (Pedersen, 2009, Pedersen, 2014b) and experimentally induced-FIP (Dean et al., 2003, de Groot-Mijnes et al., 2005). The role of lymphopenia in FIP has not been determined, but it has been equated with a decrease in cellular immunity and ultimate disease outcome in experimental infections (de Groot-Mijnes et al., 2005, Vermeulen et al., 2013). Although lymphopenia appears to play a role in FIP, temporal studies on the appearance, magnitude and duration of lymphopenia in cats that succumb or survive experimental infection have not been reported; most cell counts have been taken prior to infection and terminally.The emphasis of FIP diagnostics has long been on developing a simple blood test that would reliably and specifically detect the causative virus (Pedersen, 2014b). Herrewegh et al. (1995) reported on the detection of viral RNA in blood serum or plasma of cats experimentally and naturally infected with FIPV using a nested RT-PCR that amplified a sequence within the 3′-UTR that was highly conserved among 10 different FIPV and FECV isolates. They were able to detect feline coronavirus RNA in the serum, plasma or ascitic fluid of 14/18 cats with naturally occurring FIP. Unfortunately, they were also able to detect viral RNA in the plasma of 2/7 healthy cats that were concurrently shedding FECV in their feces. An attempt was made to eliminate this problem of specificity by developing an RT-PCR that would only measure forms of coronavirus mRNA that were replication competent (Simons et al., 2005). The rationale was that FECV would not replicate in the blood; therefore, the replicative form of genomic RNA would only be found in the blood of cats with FIP. The authors reported that this test was highly accurate in identifying cats with FIP. Shortly thereafter additional studies using the same assay demonstrated replicating forms of RNA in the blood of healthy catsinfected with FECV (Can-Sahna et al., 2007, Kipar et al., 2010), casting doubts on the specificity of such tests. The ability of FECV to replicate in blood monocyte/macrophages was also reported by other groups (Vogel et al., 2010). Chang et al. (2012) subsequently identified two specific mutations within the fusion peptide of the spike protein of FIPVs that were not present in parent FECVs. These would seem to be logical mutations to incorporate into a RT-qPCR. However, a more recent study by Porter et al. (2014) demonstrated the presence of coronavirus with the FIPV-specific fusion peptide mutation in tissues of healthy cats. They concluded that the spike fusion region specific mutation was an adaptation of FECV for growth in blood monocyte/macrophages and not directly related to disease. However, all of these various tests and objections are moot if FIPV genomic RNA is not consistently present in detectable levels by RT-qPCR in blood or blood fractions in cats with FIP.The goal of this study was to temporally correlate disease signs in experimental FIPV infection with lymphopenia, antibody response, and viremia with disease outcome (death or survival) and specific cell and organ localization of virus in terminal tissue samples by RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry. We will show that lymphopenia is the strongest predictor of disease outcome, virus is strongly associated with macrophages in lesional tissues and effusions, and viremia is not detectable at any stage of the infection even using a highly sensitive RT-qPCR.
Materials and methods
Experimental animals
Specific pathogen free cats were bred in the facilities of the Feline Research Laboratory (FRL), Center for Companion Animal Health, UC Davis under IACUC #16989. Cats used in this study were part of a larger experiment concerned with natural immunity (Pedersen et al., 2014) and were 6–9 months of age and equally intact male and female. They were housed in the FRL and cared for by FRL staff under ultimate authority of the Campus Veterinary Services.
Experimental FIPV infection
Cats were infected with a cat-passaged type I field isolate of FIPV (FIPV-m3c-2) (Pedersen et al., 2009), which has a functional mutation in the 3c gene and would not be expected to actively replicate in the intestinal epithelium (Chang et al., 2010, Pedersen et al., 2012). The inoculum was prepared as a cell-free suspension of diseased omentum (starting at 25 g/100 ml) that underwent differential centrifugation to remove particulate matter, bacteria and subcellular debris and then stored at −60 °C. It was diluted 1:80 in Hanks buffered saline prior to use and two ml was injected intraperitoneally to infect each cat. The final inoculate contained 4.32 × 105 viral genomes as determined by RT-qPCR. Cats were infected under IACUC protocol #16637 and monitored for disease signs and euthanatized when their disease status was deemed clinically terminal, usually within 2–4 weeks of infection.
Sample collection
Blood samples were taken at weekly intervals and a gross necropsy performed at the time of death. Blood and tissue samples were harvested and archived for this and future studies.
Blood cell counts
Whole blood was diluted 1:10 with RBC lysis solution (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and total white blood counts were done microscopically with a hematocytometer. Slides of blood smears were stained using a Differential Quick Stain Kit (Modified Giemsa) (Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, PA) and differential cell counts performed manually.
Histopathology and immunohistochemistry
Samples of tissues obtained at necropsy were immediately placed in 10% buffered formalin and fixed for 24 h before being routinely embedded into paraffin blocks. Tissues that were examined histologically (all cats) and by immunohistochemistry (two cats) included liver, spleen, kidney, mesenteric lymph node, omentum, ileum, caecum, heart, and lungs.Immunohistochemistry was performed on 4 μm serial sections of formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tissues using a streptavidin biotin detection system (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA). Mouse monoclonal antibodies to FIPV (Custom Monoclonal International, clone FIPV3-70, 1:200), CD18 (Peter Moore, UC Davis, clone Fe3.9F2), and CD3 (Peter Moore, UC Davis, clone CD3-12) were used with some modifications. Before applying the primary antibodies, slides were steam pretreated in citrate buffer (Dako S1699) at 98 °C for 20 min followed by a 20 min cooling. They were then washed in PBS and blocked with 10% normal horse serum for 20 min. Amino ethyl carbazole (AEC, Dako Corp.) was used as the chromogen sections were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin. Substituting a matched mouse IgG correlate for the primary antibody served as the negative control.
Ascites macrophage isolation and immunocytochemistry
Viable ascites macrophages were isolated by positive immunomagnetic selection columns (MACS MicroBeads, Miltenyi Biotec) and anti-CD11b (Peter Moore, UC Davis, clone CA16.3E10-IgG1) following manufacturers protocols. Enriched cells were deposited on a glass slide using cytocentrifugation (Cytospin 4; Thermo Shandon). Immunocytochemistry for Coronavirus was performed as described above with the following modifications: primary antibody dilution 1:100 and no antigen retrieval step. Virally infected Fcwf-4 cells (ATCC) and uninfected cells were used as positive and negative controls.
RT-qPCR for virus quantitation
FIPV genomic RNA was detected using a RT-qPCR directed to a region of the accessory 7b gene according to a published procedure (Gut et al., 1999). RNA integrity and quantity was assessed in parallel with an 18S rRNA based Real-time PCR test. The specificity of the fluorogenic RT-PCR was confirmed by sequencing the plasmid pT7-StFCoV by the chain termination method (Microsynth, Balgach, Switzerland). The Real-time PCR was run with three contamination controls including regular negative controls, negative extraction controls and laboratory monitoring for the absence of random positive PCR signals. To eliminate PCR product carry over, all reactions included the AmpErase UNG system (Pang et al., 1992). Absence of PCR inhibition is confirmed by using a spike-in internal positive control. This procedure was reportedly 10–100 times more sensitive in detecting FIPV mRNA than that achieved with a nested RT-PCR that was described earlier (Herrewegh et al., 1995). The sensitivity of the assay plotting cycle threshold (CT) values against FIPV genomic RNA copy numbers is shown in Fig. 1
. At 40 cycles, considered the upper limit of meaningful amplification for RT-qPCR, the assay was capable of detecting ∼1000 mRNA copies/ml of fluid or g of tissue.
Fig. 1
Sensitivity of the RT-qPCR used in this study to detect FIPV genomes.
Sensitivity of the RT-qPCR used in this study to detect FIPV genomes.
Results
Clinical responses
The first clinical sign of disease was observed at around 2 weeks post-infection and consisted of a fever ranging from 30.3 °C to 40.9 °C in 18 of the 20 cats (Fig. 2
). A more undulating fever was observed in one other cat (#31) starting at around 2 weeks post-infection but it did not become persistent until week 6. A final cat (#26) was febrile (39.5 °C) only on day 19. The onset of fever was followed by increasing inappetance, jaundice, bilirubinuria, hyperbilirubinemia, and abdominal effusion in 19 of the 20 cats. The one surviving cat demonstrated no clinical signs of disease. In accordance with the IACUC protocol, 18 cats were euthanatized at post-infection days 14–28, one cat (#31) survived until week 6, and one cat (#26) showed no clinical signs of disease through week 6 and has remained healthy up to the time of this submission (>7 months) (Table 1
).
Fig. 2
Febrile responses of cats that were experimentally infected with FIPV.
Table 1
RT-qPCR CT values for FIPV genomic RNA in whole blood, plasma, and WBC fraction of experimentally infected cats during the six week post-infection period.
Days
Cat
P25
P26
P27
P28
P29
P30
P31
P32
P33
P34
P35
P36
P37
P38
P39
P40
P41
P42
P43
P44
D15a
D15a
D14a
D20a
D20a
D42a
D26a
D14a
D26a
D15a
D26a
D23a
D20a
D26a
D20a
D22a
D18a
D19a
D14a
Plasma
0
–
–
37
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
39
–
–
7
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
14
–
–
–
–b
–
–
–
–
–b
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
40b
–b
–b
–b
40b
–b
–b
–b
–b
–b
21
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–b
–b
26
–
–
–b
–b
–b
40b
42
–
–b
Whole blood
0
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7
–
–
–
–
–
–
38
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
37b
14
–
–
–
–b
–
–
–
–
–b
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
39
–
38b
–b
38b
–b
–b
39b
40b
40b
–b
21
–
–
–
–
–
–
–b
–
–b
–b
26
–
–
–b
37b
–b
–b
42
–
–b
WBC
0
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
37
–
–
–
–
7
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
38
–
36
14
–
–
–
–b
–
–
–
–
40b
–
–
–
–
40
–
–
–
–
–
–b
–b
38b
–b
–b
–b
–b
40b
38b
–b
21
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–b
37b
26
–
–
–b
37b
38b
38b
42
–
40b
Euthanized.
Terminal CT value.
Febrile responses of cats that were experimentally infected with FIPV.RT-qPCR CT values for FIPV genomic RNA in whole blood, plasma, and WBC fraction of experimentally infectedcats during the six week post-infection period.Euthanized.Terminal CT value.Diarrhea of a moderate to severe nature was noticed pre-mortem in the litterboxes of some of the cats, usually beginning 2–3 weeks post-infection. Diarrheic, non-odorous, bile-tinged stool with excess gas and mucus was identified in both the small and large intestine in 11/19 cats at necropsy. Feces from the remaining cats were of normal form and consistency.
Serum antibody responses
Feline coronavirus-specific antibodies, as measured by IFA, appeared in the serum between 2 and 3 weeks post-infection and rose to terminal titers of 1:100–1:400 or higher (Fig. 3
). The appearance of antibodies in the serum correlated with the onset of disease signs (Fig. 2, Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Anti-feline coronavirus titers in plasma of cats experimentally infected with FIPV.
Anti-feline coronavirus titers in plasma of cats experimentally infected with FIPV.
Hematology
The total white blood cell count decreased somewhat over the 2–6 week observation period in the 19 cats that developed FIP (Fig. 4
). A profound lymphopenia occurred starting at around 2–4 weeks post-infection and correlated with the disease course (Fig. 4). The earlier lymphopenia occurred post-infection, the more rapid the disease course. The one cat (P31) that survived 6 weeks did not become severely lymphopenic until after week 4, while the one surviving cat (P26) never became lymphopenic (Fig. 5
). Gross bilirubinuria and jaundice correlated with disease course, appearing earlier in cats with more rapid disease.
Fig. 4
Absolute total white cell and lymphocyte counts of 18 cats that died within 2–4 weeks following experimental infection with FIPV.
Fig. 5
Absolute total white blood cell and lymphocyte counts of two cats experimentally infected with FIP, one (p26) of which resisted disease and one (p31) that died at 6 weeks post-infection.
Absolute total white cell and lymphocyte counts of 18 cats that died within 2–4 weeks following experimental infection with FIPV.Absolute total white blood cell and lymphocyte counts of two cats experimentally infected with FIP, one (p26) of which resisted disease and one (p31) that died at 6 weeks post-infection.
Gross pathology
A diffuse peritonitis with effusion of 30–300 ml of viscid, yellow-tinged, cloudy fluid was present at necropsy. The omentum and gastro-splenic mesentery manifested severe vascular congestion, edema, and serous atrophy of fat (Fig. 6
). Intestinal mesenteries, abdominal serosa, and capsular surfaces of abdominal organs were less severely affected. Surface orientated plaques, <1 to several mm in size, were a characteristic feature of the inflammation (Fig. 6). Fibrin tags were free in the abdomen and common on the spleen and liver margins. The spleen, caecum and caecal-colic/mesenteric lymph nodes were frequently enlarged. The liver appeared grossly normal below the capsule in all but two affected cats, which demonstrated 0.5–1 mm whitish foci throughout the parenchyma. The kidneys were not grossly involved below the level of the capsule. The lungs, heart and other thoracic tissues appeared normal in 15/19 cats necropsied. The remaining four cats had signs of mediastinitis with enlargement of the sternal lymph nodes. The pericardium was thickened with an increased amount of pericardial fluid in two of these cats. The popliteal lymph nodes were normal in size and appearance.
Fig. 6
Gross appearance of the abdomen in a cat with experimentally induced effusive FIP. The omentum is edematous, omental vessels prominent and reddened, the surface of the spleen is covered with whitish plaques (pyogranulomas) and fibrin, and the abdomen is filled with a yellowish exudate.
Gross appearance of the abdomen in a cat with experimentally induced effusive FIP. The omentum is edematous, omental vessels prominent and reddened, the surface of the spleen is covered with whitish plaques (pyogranulomas) and fibrin, and the abdomen is filled with a yellowish exudate.Histologic lesions were common to all of the cats and included pyogranulomatous vasculitis of the omentum (Fig. 7
), mesentery, visceral peritoneal surface of the spleen, liver, mesenteric lymph node, caecum, and ileum; predominantly histocytic, neutrophilic, and fibrinous peritonitis; serous atrophy of omental fat (Fig. 7); subcapsular splenic histiocytosis; splenic neutrophilia and ellipsoid hyperplasia. Abnormalities not uniformly observed in all cats included pyogranulomatous lymphadentitis and necrosis in the mesenteric lymph nodes and caecal and ileal Peyers patches; pyogranulomatous vasculitis of the caecal and ileal wall with associated local peritonitis; lymphoid hyperplasia of mesenteric lymph nodes; and pyogranulomatous hepatitis. The lungs and heart, with the exception of the pericardium and mediastinum in several cats, appeared to be unaffected by gross examination. No gross or clinical signs of ocular or neurologic disease were observed and tissues from these organs were therefore not studied.
Fig. 7
Omentum (Hematoxylin and Eosin). The omentum is greatly expanded by pyogranulomatous inflammatory nodules and peritoneal inflammation. Blood vessels are prominent and there is multifocal serous atrophy of fat.
Omentum (Hematoxylin and Eosin). The omentum is greatly expanded by pyogranulomatous inflammatory nodules and peritoneal inflammation. Blood vessels are prominent and there is multifocal serous atrophy of fat.Immunohistochemistry for feline coronavirus antigen, CD18, and CD3 were performed on these same tissues from two of the 19 cats. Immunoperoxidase staining demonstrated the presence of cell-associated feline coronavirus antigen within pyogranulomas and on the peritoneal surface (Fig. 8
). Pyogranulomas contained a predominance of cells staining strongly positive for CD18, a characteristic of macrophages (Fig. 9
), and lower proportions of CD3 positive T-lymphocytes and typical neutrophils (Fig. 10
). Viral antigen was found exclusively in the large foamy macrophage-like cells (Fig. 11
). Enterocytes of the caecum and ileum were uniformly negative for feline coronavirus antigen, while cells in the inflammatory reaction on the serosal surface stained positive (Fig. 12
).
Fig. 8
Omentum stained for FIPV antigen (Immunoperoxidase). FIP antigen is present in inflammatory nodules and on the peritoneal surface.
Fig. 9
Omentum (Immunoperoxidase). High magnification of an omental pyogranuloma demonstrates a predominance of strongly CD18 positive macrophages (400×).
Fig. 10
Omentum (Immunoperoxidase). Immunoreactivity for CD3 demonstrates few T lymphocytes present in omental pyogranulomas (400×).
Fig. 11
Omentum (Immunoperoxidase): High magnification of an omental pyogranuloma shows a predominance of mononuclear cells. Immunopositivity for FIPV antigen is present in a population of large foamy macrophages (400×).
Fig. 12
Terminal ileum (Immunoperoxidase). FIP antigen is present within macrophages on the inflamed serosal surface, but is not observed in enterocytes.
Omentum stained for FIPV antigen (Immunoperoxidase). FIP antigen is present in inflammatory nodules and on the peritoneal surface.Omentum (Immunoperoxidase). High magnification of an omental pyogranuloma demonstrates a predominance of strongly CD18 positive macrophages (400×).Omentum (Immunoperoxidase). Immunoreactivity for CD3 demonstrates few T lymphocytes present in omental pyogranulomas (400×).Omentum (Immunoperoxidase): High magnification of an omental pyogranuloma shows a predominance of mononuclear cells. Immunopositivity for FIPV antigen is present in a population of large foamy macrophages (400×).Terminal ileum (Immunoperoxidase). FIP antigen is present within macrophages on the inflamed serosal surface, but is not observed in enterocytes.
Immunomagnetic isolation CD11b cells from ascites and immunocytochemistry
In order to confirm that FIPV was replicating exclusively in macrophages, cells positive for the CD11b cell surface marker were isolated from the ascites fluid of one of the cats. Both neutrophils and macrophages were isolated in pure form as expected, given that CD11b is present on the surface membranes of both cell types. Positive staining for FIPV antigen was limited to the large mononuclear cell population, while neutrophils did not stain (Fig. 13
).
Fig. 13
Ascites fluid (Immunoperoxidase). Cytospin concentrated CD11b positive cells from FIP infected cat ascites fluid is comprised prodominantly of macrophages and lesser numbers of neutrophils. Macrophages demonstrate abundant membranous and variable cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for FIPV antigen by immunocytochemistry. Neutrophils are diffusely negative for FIPV.
Ascites fluid (Immunoperoxidase). Cytospin concentrated CD11b positive cells from FIP infected cat ascites fluid is comprised prodominantly of macrophages and lesser numbers of neutrophils. Macrophages demonstrate abundant membranous and variable cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for FIPV antigen by immunocytochemistry. Neutrophils are diffusely negative for FIPV.
FIPV genomic RNA levels in tissues, feces, ascites and blood
FIPV genomic RNA, expressed as viral copies, was detected at high levels only in inflamed organs and effusion, while tissues from organs that did not appear to be grossly and histologically involved in the disease process frequently tested negative or were positive at much lower levels (Fig. 14, Fig. 15
). FIPV genomic RNA could not be detected from an identical set of tissues from two healthy cats (data not shown). The highest FIPV genomic RNA levels were in omentum, mesenteric lymph nodes, spleen and ascites, while low to negative levels were found in the kidney, lung, heart muscle, and popliteal lymph node. Viral genomic RNA was detected at variable levels in the liver and feces (Fig. 14). Although diarrheic stool had CT values ranging from 27.5 to 40.0 (3.94 × 106 to 3.57 × 102 FIPV genomes/g) and normal appearing stool 33–40 (8.87 × 104 to 3.57 × 102 FIPV genomes/g), the respective mean CT values were 34.8 and 34.3, indicating a lack of relationship between fecal virus shedding and diarrhea. FIPV genomic RNA was not detected in a 6-week fecal sample taken from the single surviving cat. A high level of viral genomic RNA was detected in the ascitic fluid and over 90–99% (10 to 100-fold greater) was cell-associated rather than in the supernatant (Fig. 15).
Fig. 14
Levels of FIPV genomic RNA in various tissues from cats experimentally infected with FIPV.
Fig. 15
Levels of FIPV genomic RNA in ascitic fluid from cats experimentally infected with FIPV.
Levels of FIPV genomic RNA in various tissues from cats experimentally infected with FIPV.Levels of FIPV genomic RNA in ascitic fluid from cats experimentally infected with FIPV.FIPV genomic RNA levels in whole blood, white cell fraction, and plasma collected prior to any feline coronavirus exposure had CT values ranging from 37 to 40.0 (Table 1). Therefore, only CT values ≤37 were considered to be reliably positive for blood.
Discussion
The clinical abnormalities, complete blood count changes, feline coronavirus antibody responses, and gross and histologic pathology were typical of experimentally induced and naturally occurring effusive abdominal FIP. The first sign of disease was fever appearing around 2 weeks post-infection followed by the more specific clinical signs of effusive abdominal FIP. The occurrence of fever coincided with the appearance of serum antibodies, as has been previously shown (Pedersen and Boyle, 1980, Weiss and Scott, 1981). There was no relationship between the magnitude of the antibody response and disease outcome, with the highest titer being found in one cat that lived 6 weeks before succumbing. The relationship between the onset of disease signs and appearance of antibodies was not coincidental. Previous studies have shown that virus neutralizing antibodies to S gene epitopes play a key role in enhancing disease by facilitating the uptake of FIPV by macrophages (Hohdatsu et al., 1998, Dewerchin et al., 2006) and participating in antigen/antibody/complement mediated vasculitis (Pedersen and Boyle, 1980, Jacobse-Geels et al., 1982). Antibody-dependent enhancement involving antibodies against S gene proteins has also been shown to play a role in SARS coronavirus infection (Wang et al., 2014).The absolute lymphocyte count in blood was the most accurate predictor of disease outcome. The one surviving cat (P26) never manifested lymphopenia, while a second cat (P31) that survived for 6 weeks maintained near normal lymphocyte numbers until the last week of life. In contrast, the 18 cats that died within 4 weeks of infection demonstrated a precipitous drop in blood lymphocytes starting at 2 weeks post-infection. A similarly profound decrease in blood lymphocytes has been previously associated with disease signs in experimental FIPV infection (Dean et al., 2003), and varying degrees of lymphopenia are a common feature of naturally occurring FIP (Pedersen, 2009). Although T lymphocytes were entering diseased tissues, their proportion was low compared to macrophages and their numbers not appear sufficient to be solely responsible for the pronounced lymphopenia. Previous studies have associated lymphopenia in cats with experimentally induced FIP with a major apoptotic event (Dean et al., 2003). Apoptosis of lymphocytes has been implicated as a cause of lymphopenia and associated immunodeficiency in other virus infections (Razvi and Welsh, 1993).Our finding that disease outcome in experimental FIP infection is associated with the degree of lymphopenia is in agreement with a conclusion made by de Groot-Mijnes et al. (2005), who studied experimental disease caused by the highly virulent type II FIPV-70-1146 – “Our combined observations suggest a model for FIP pathogenesis in which virus-induced T-cell depletion and the antiviral T-cell response are opposing forces and in which the efficacy of early T-cell responses critically determines the outcome of the infection.” This conclusion has been mirrored by Fan et al. (2014), who postulated that “depending on intensity of the apoptosis of healthy cells, the apoptosis can either promote or comfort the long-term evolution of HIV infection.”We did not determine the lymphocyte subclasses that were most affected although the severity of the lymphocyte depletion suggested that both T and B subsets were involved. However, previous studies indicate that T cells, NK cells and T regs are most severely reduced in cats with naturally and experimentally induced FIP (Dean et al., 2003, Vermeulen et al., 2013).Fecal levels of viral genomic RNA were low compared to what has been seen during primary infection with a field strain of FECV (Pedersen et al., 2008). Fecal virus in these FIPVinfectedcats ranged from around 1000 to 100,000 genomic RNA copies per gram of feces, far below levels detected in a single fecal swab during primary FECVinfection (Pedersen et al., 2008). Although we did not determine the source of the fecal virus in these FIPVinfectedcats, it did not appear to be from enterocytes.Immunohistochemistry failed to show infected enterocytes in either the ileum or caecum, sites of known virus replication during acute FECVinfection (Pedersen et al., 1981, Meli et al., 2004). Moreover, enterocyte infection was not expected in these cats because the FIPV isolate used in this study had a truncated 3c gene and such mutants appear to have lost their ability to replicate in the intestinal epithelium (Chang et al., 2010, Pedersen et al., 2012). The viral RNA detected in feces was more likely to be a product of the intense inflammation that often involved the serosal surface of the intestines and often extended deeper into the intestinal wall in organs such as the ileum, caecum and colon. This conclusion was supported by the lack of fecal virus shedding in the one cat that never showed signs of disease.The most significant findings in this study involved the relative paucity of viral genomic RNA detected in blood over the course of the infection and terminally in various tissues, which has direct implications on the use of RT-qPCR for diagnosing FIP from blood. It was not surprising to find high levels of virus terminally in grossly diseased tissues such as omentum, spleen and mesenteric lymph node and in abdominal effusions, and lower levels in organs such as liver, kidney, heart and lung that did not show gross parenchymal involvement. The levels of viral genomic RNA paralleled the intensity of the inflammatory response, which in turn paralleled the numbers of infected macrophages in the tissues or effusion. The selective targeting of macrophages by FIPV, which has been previously demonstrated (Pedersen and Boyle, 1980, Kipar et al., 1998), was reconfirmed by immunohistochemistry of heavily involved tissues such as the omentum, spleen, mesenteric lymph nodes and caecum, and ascitic fluid. Cells present in the ascitic fluid, which were predominantly macrophages, contained from 90 to 99% of the virus present in the each sample. The most parsimonious scenario would be that virus released from infected macrophages is immediately taken up by other macrophages and that this cycle builds in intensity over time as more and more virus is produced and more and more macrophages either arrive from the blood as monocytes or proliferate locally from adventitial progenitors (Psaltis et al., 2014). The strict containment of an infectious agent in a single cell type such as macrophages is reminiscent of fastidious mycobacterial diseases of cats (Malik et al., 2013) and tuberculosis of humans (Mehrotra et al., 2014).Although we failed to reliably detect coronavirus genomic RNA in blood at any stage of experimental infection with a field strain of Type I FIPV, others have reported a viremia using an identical RT-qPCR procedure (Gut et al., 1999). However, closer examination of these studies indicates that detection of feline coronavirus genomic RNA has not been as clear-cut as assumed, mainly because detection is often at or beyond the limits of reliability for the assay procedure. Three studies reported on the detection of feline coronavirus RNA in blood, but all were concerned with FECV rather than FIPV infection and detection was inconsistent (Meli et al., 2004, Kipar et al., 2010, Vogel et al., 2010). Kipar et al., 2001, Kipar et al., 2006 compared virus loads in various tissues, excluding blood, in naturally infectedcats and indicated that virus loads were higher in FIPV than FECVinfectedcats. Gunn-Moore et al. (1998b) used RT-PCR to detect FIPV genomic RNA in whole blood or plasma of 80–90% cats with FIP, both directly and after co-cultivation with WFE cells; plasma was just as likely to test positive as whole blood. However, they also found that 83–89% of healthy cats from FECV enzootic households also tested positive. de Groot-Mijnes et al. (2005) described a viremic phase in a subset of cats with FIP but virus loads were derived from RT-qPCR and RT-PCR data, as well as other data not shown. Moreover, virus levels where elevated usually at week one and terminally and were usually associated with CT values from 36 to 40. We conclude that viremia even in cats with highly fulminant experimentally induced FIP is either non-existent or below the reliable detection limits of highly sensitive RT-qPCR at all stages of the infection. Virus detection should concentrate on tissues and effusions containing FIPVinfected macrophages.
Authors: Liesbeth Vogel; Mariken Van der Lubben; Eddie G te Lintelo; Cornelis P J Bekker; Tamara Geerts; Leontine S Schuijff; Guy C M Grinwis; Herman F Egberink; Peter J M Rottier Journal: Vet Res Date: 2010-07-23 Impact factor: 3.683
Authors: Niels C Pedersen; Hongwei Liu; Jennifer Scarlett; Christian M Leutenegger; Lyudmila Golovko; Heather Kennedy; Farina Mustaffa Kamal Journal: Virus Res Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 3.303
Authors: Lowiese M B Desmarets; Ben L Vermeulen; Sebastiaan Theuns; Nádia Conceição-Neto; Mark Zeller; Inge D M Roukaerts; Delphine D Acar; Dominique A J Olyslaegers; Marc Van Ranst; Jelle Matthijnssens; Hans J Nauwynck Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Sandra Felten; Christian M Leutenegger; Hans-Joerg Balzer; Nikola Pantchev; Kaspar Matiasek; Gerhard Wess; Herman Egberink; Katrin Hartmann Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Niels C Pedersen; Yunjeong Kim; Hongwei Liu; Anushka C Galasiti Kankanamalage; Chrissy Eckstrand; William C Groutas; Michael Bannasch; Juliana M Meadows; Kyeong-Ok Chang Journal: J Feline Med Surg Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 2.015
Authors: B G Murphy; M Perron; E Murakami; K Bauer; Y Park; C Eckstrand; M Liepnieks; N C Pedersen Journal: Vet Microbiol Date: 2018-04-22 Impact factor: 3.293