| Literature DB >> 25532836 |
Chang-Wei Li1, Cheng-Bin Cui2.
Abstract
In the present study, a new flavanoid 1, together with nine known ones 2-10 were isolated from the stem bark of Choerospondias axillaries, the fruit of which was used mainly for treatment of cardiovascular diseases in China. The structure of 1 was established on the basis of its extensive spectral data, and the absolute structures of 1 and 10 were determined by their CD data. The absolute structure of 10 was established for the first time. Among the obtained compounds, 5-8 inhibited the proliferation of K562 cells with inhibition rates of 26.6%, 65.7%, 40.4% and 45.6% at 100 µg/mL; 1 and 4-10 showed significant protective effects on anoxia-induced injury in cultured ECV304 or PC12 cells at 50 µg/mL; 8 and 9 showed antibacterial effects on Staphylococcus aureus ATCC6538 at the tested concentration of 150 µg/8 mm paper disc. Compounds 2 and 4-10 were isolated for the first time from this genus. The proliferation inhibiting activities of 7 and 8, the anti-hypoxia activities of 1 and 4-10, and the antibacterial effect of 8 and 9 on Staphylococcus aureus ATCC6538 are reported here for the first time.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25532836 PMCID: PMC6271225 DOI: 10.3390/molecules191221363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structures of compounds 1–10.
400 MHz 1H-NMR and 100 MHz 13C-NMR data of 1 and 3 a.
| Position | 1 ( in CD3OD) | 3 ( in DMSO-
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δH | δC | δH | δC | |
| narigenin | ||||
| 2 | 5.31 (1H, dd,
| 79.7 | 5.53 (1H, dd,
| 78.6 |
| 3 | 3.07 (1H, dd,
| 43.3 | Overlapped | 42.5 |
| 4 | 197.3 | 196.7 | ||
| 4a | 102.9 | 102.3 | ||
| 5 | 164.9 | 163.3 | ||
| 6 | 5.90 (1H, d,
| 96.6 | 5.90 (1H, d,
| 96.4 |
| 7 | 167.6 | 167.2 | ||
| 8 | 5.88 (1H, d,
| 95.8 | 5.89 (1H, d,
| 95.5 |
| 8a | 164.3 | 164.0 | ||
| 1′ | 133.5 | 132.4 | ||
| 2′ | 7.29 (1H, d,
| 128.4 | 7.44 (2H, d,
| 128.6 |
| 3′ | 7.06 (1H, d,
| 117.1 | 7.07 (2H, d,
| 116.7 |
| 4′ | 158.5 | 158.1 | ||
| 5′ | 7.06 (1H, d,
| 117.1 | 7.07 (2H, d,
| 116.7 |
| 6′ | 7.29 (1H, d,
| 128.4 | 7.44 (2H, d,
| 128.6 |
| 5-OH | 12.13 (1H, s) | |||
| 7-OH | 10.82 (1H, s) | |||
| glucosyl | ||||
| 1″ | 4.91 (1H, d,
| 101.5 | 4.89 (1H, d,
| 100.8 |
| 2″ | 3.49–3.54 (1H, m) | 74.3 | 3.13–3.49 (1H, m) | 73.7 |
| 3″ | 3.49–3.54 (1H, m) | 77.5 | 3.13–3.49 (1H, m) | 77.6 |
| 4″ | 3.42 (1H, m) | 71.5 | 3.13–3.49 (1H, m) | 70.2 |
| 5″ | 3.78 (1H, m) | 75.1 | 3.13–3.49 (1H, m) | 77.1 |
| 6″ | 4.38 (1H, dd,
| 64.4 | 3.13–3.49 (1H, m) | 61.2 |
| galloyl | ||||
| 1‴ | 120.8 | |||
| 2‴ | 7.10 (1H, s) | 109.8 | ||
| 3‴ | 146.0 | |||
| 4‴ | 139.4 | |||
| 5‴ | 146.0 | |||
| 6‴ | 7.10 (1H, s) | 109.8 | ||
| 7‴ (C=O) | 167.9 | |||
a The δH and δC values were recorded using solvent signals (CD3OD: δH 3.31/δC 49.0 for 1; DMSO-d6: δH 2.50/δC 39.5 for 3) as references. Signal assignments were based on the results of 1H–1H COSY, HMQC and HMBC experiments.
Figure 2Structure and the HMBC correlations of 1.
Figure 3The CD spectrum and the absolute structure of 1. (A): The absolute structure of 1; (B): The conformation of 1; (C): CD spectrum of 1 in MeOH (1 mg/mL).
400 MHz 1H-NMR and 100 MHz 13C-NMR data of 10 in CD3OD a.
| Position | δH | 1H-1H COSY | δ | HMBC (H→C) | NOESY | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2(u) | 3.96 (1H, m) | 78.1 | C-3(u), 4(u), 6′(u) | 4(u)-Hb | |||
| 3(u) | 3.96 (1H, m) | 4(u)-H | 65.5 | C-2(u), 4(u), 1′(u) | 4(u)-Ha, 2′(u)-Ha | ||
| 4(u) | Ha:2.52 (1H, dd,
| 3(u)-H 3(u)-H | 27.0 | C-2(u), 3(u), 4a(u), 5(u) | 3(u), 4(u)-Hb 2(u), 4(u)-Ha | ||
| 4a(u) | 99.1 | ||||||
| 5(u) | 155.0 c | ||||||
| 6(u) | 5.52 (1H, d,
| 8(u) | 94.4 d | C-4a(u), 5(u),7(u), 8(u) | |||
| 7(u) | 156.4 c | ||||||
| 8(u) | 5.89 (1H, d,
| 6(u) | 95.7 d | C-4a(u), 6(u), 7(u), 8a(u) | |||
| 8a(u) | 156.7 c | ||||||
| 1′(u) | 88.5 | ||||||
| 2′(u) | Ha:2.67 (1H, d,
| 44.3 | C-2(u),1′(u),3′(u),6′(u) | 3(u), 2′(u)-Hb 2′(u)-Ha | |||
| 3′(u) | 94.0 | ||||||
| 4′(u) | 192.8 | ||||||
| 5′(u) | 6.41 (1H, s) | 111.5 | C-2′(u),1′(u),3′(u),6′(u) | ||||
| 6′(u) | 162.8 | ||||||
| 2(t) | 4.92 (1H, d,
| 3(t)-H | 82.1 | C-3(t), 4(t), 1′(t), 2′(t),6′(t),8a(t) | 4(t)-Ha | ||
| 3(t) | 4.11 (1H, td,
| 2(t)-H, 4(t)-H | 66.5 | C-4a(t) | 4(t)-Hb | ||
| 4(t) | Ha:2.59 (1H, dd,
| 3(t)-H 3(t)-H | 26.5 | C-2(t), 3(t), 4a(t), 5(t), 8a(t) | 2(t), 4(t)-Hb 3(t), 4(t)-Ha | ||
| 4a(t) | 102.6 | ||||||
| 5(t) | 164.9 | ||||||
| 6(t) | 6.11 (1H, s) | 89.6 | C-5(t), 8(t) | ||||
| 7(t) | 166.7 | ||||||
| 8(t) | 104.3 | ||||||
| 8a(t) | 153.8 | ||||||
| 1′(t) | 129.9 | ||||||
| 2′(t) | 6.84 (1H, d,
| 5′(t) | 113.5 | C-2(t), 4′(t), 6′(t) | 2(t), 3(t) | ||
| 3′(t) | 145.0 e | ||||||
| 4′(t) | 145.2 e | ||||||
| 5′(t) | 6.78 (1H, d,
| 2′(t), 6′(t) | 115.0 | C-1′(t), 3′(t) | |||
| 6′(t) | 6.73 (1H, dd,
| 5′(t) | 118.4 | C-2(t), 2′(t), 4′(t) | 2(t), 3(t) | ||
a The δH and δC values were recorded using solvent signals (CD3OD: δH 3.31/δC 49.0) as references. Signal assignments were based on the results of 1H–1H COSY, HMQC and HMBC experiments signals. b–e The signals could not be assigned exactly.
Scheme 1The plausible biosynthetic pathway of compound 10.
Figure 4(A,B) the two conformations of compound 10; (C) Standard conformation of cyclohexenone ring showing the positive CE and its application of the octant rule; (D) The CD spectrum of compound 10 (1 mg/mL, MeOH).
Figure 5Photographs of K562 cells treated with 5–8 for 24 h at 100 µg/mL.
Anti-hypoxia effects of 1 and 4–10 on anoxic tested cells (50 µg/mL).
| Samples | Tested Cells | Cell Viabilities (mean value ± SD%, n = 10) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Test Group | ||
| PC12 | 90.0 ± 6.1 | 131.4 ± 15.3 ** | |
| ECV304 | 22.6 ± 0.1 | 17.1 ± 1.2 | |
| ECV304 | 22.6 ± 0.1 | 27.8 ± 1.5 | |
| ECV304 | 36.1 ± 1.7 | 46.4 ± 1.0 * | |
| ECV304 | 36.1 ± 1.7 | 51.9 ± 0.9 *** | |
| PC12 | 82.8 ± 5.3 | 108.1 ± 6.5 ** | |
| PC12 | 85.9 ± 4.0 | 174.0 ± 8.7 ** | |
| PC12 | 85.9 ± 4.0 | 155.6 ± 14.4 ** | |
| PC12 | 90.0 ± 6.1 | 120.8 ± 9.8 ** | |
| PC12 | 90.0 ± 6.1 | 122.7 ± 7.1 ** | |
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, compared with model group.