| Literature DB >> 25532595 |
Katie W Hsih1, Mark S Iscoe1, Joshua R Lupton1, Tyler E Mains1, Suresh K Nayar1, Megan S Orlando1, Aaron S Parzuchowski1, Mark F Sabbagh1, John C Schulz1, Kevin Shenderov1, Daren J Simkin1, Sharif Vakili1, Judith B Vick1, Tim Xu1, Ophelia Yin1, Harry R Goldberg1.
Abstract
Student feedback is a valuable asset in curriculum evaluation and improvement, but many institutions have faced challenges implementing it in a meaningful way. In this article, we report the rationale, process and impact of the Student Curriculum Review Team (SCRT), a student-led and faculty-supported organization at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. SCRT's evaluation of each pre-clinical course is composed of a comprehensive three-step process: a review of course evaluation data, a Town Hall Meeting and online survey to generate and assess potential solutions, and a thoughtful discussion with course directors. Over the past two years, SCRT has demonstrated the strength of its approach by playing a substantial role in improving medical education, as reported by students and faculty. Furthermore, SCRT's uniquely student-centered, collaborative model has strengthened relationships between students and faculty and is one that could be readily adapted to other medical schools or academic institutions.Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25532595 DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.990877
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Teach ISSN: 0142-159X Impact factor: 3.650