Literature DB >> 25532595

The Student Curriculum Review Team: How we catalyze curricular changes through a student-centered approach.

Katie W Hsih1, Mark S Iscoe1, Joshua R Lupton1, Tyler E Mains1, Suresh K Nayar1, Megan S Orlando1, Aaron S Parzuchowski1, Mark F Sabbagh1, John C Schulz1, Kevin Shenderov1, Daren J Simkin1, Sharif Vakili1, Judith B Vick1, Tim Xu1, Ophelia Yin1, Harry R Goldberg1.   

Abstract

Student feedback is a valuable asset in curriculum evaluation and improvement, but many institutions have faced challenges implementing it in a meaningful way. In this article, we report the rationale, process and impact of the Student Curriculum Review Team (SCRT), a student-led and faculty-supported organization at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. SCRT's evaluation of each pre-clinical course is composed of a comprehensive three-step process: a review of course evaluation data, a Town Hall Meeting and online survey to generate and assess potential solutions, and a thoughtful discussion with course directors. Over the past two years, SCRT has demonstrated the strength of its approach by playing a substantial role in improving medical education, as reported by students and faculty. Furthermore, SCRT's uniquely student-centered, collaborative model has strengthened relationships between students and faculty and is one that could be readily adapted to other medical schools or academic institutions.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25532595     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.990877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  7 in total

1.  Student curriculum review team, 8 years later: Where we stand and opportunities for growth.

Authors:  Priyanka Kumar; Christina M Pickering; Lyla Atta; Austin G Burns; Robert F Chu; Thomas Gracie; Caroline X Qin; Katherine A Whang; Harry R Goldberg
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 2.  Bridging the Chasm: Challenges, Opportunities, and Resources for Integrating a Dissemination and Implementation Science Curriculum into Medical Education.

Authors:  Tamar Ginossar; Carolyn J Heckman; Deborah Cragun; Lisa M Quintiliani; Enola K Proctor; David A Chambers; Ted Skolarus; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2018-04-04

3.  Benefit of focus group discussion beyond online survey in course evaluations by medical students in the United States: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Katharina Brandl; Soniya V Rabadia; Alexander Chang; Jess Mandel
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2018-10-16

4.  Empowering medical students as agents of curricular change: a value-added approach to student engagement in medical education.

Authors:  Joseph R Geraghty; Alexandria N Young; Tiffani D M Berkel; Eric Wallbruch; Julie Mann; Yoon Soo Park; Laura E Hirshfield; Abbas Hyderi
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2020-02

5.  Indian Public Health Students' Perspectives on Global Health Education.

Authors:  Shailendra Sawleshwarkar; Sanjay P Zodpey; Joel Negin
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-01-20

Review 6.  Student evaluations of teaching and the development of a comprehensive measure of teaching effectiveness for medical schools.

Authors:  Constantina Constantinou; Marjo Wijnen-Meijer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Student-led curricular approaches in medical education: the educational effects of a virtual fundamentals of COVID-19 course.

Authors:  Megan Z Chiu; Rolando G Gerena; Rebekah L Roll; Joseph M Baker; Maritza Gomez; Cameron M Brown; Abigail M Brenner; Christina C Huang; Paul Y Ko; Margaret E Bauer; Daniel J Trujillo
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.