Literature DB >> 25532589

Varying the electronic structure of surface-bound ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes.

Dennis L Ashford1, M Kyle Brennaman, Robert J Brown, Shahar Keinan, Javier J Concepcion, John M Papanikolas, Joseph L Templeton, Thomas J Meyer.   

Abstract

In the design of light-harvesting chromophores for use in dye-sensitized photoelectrosynthesis cells (DSPECs), surface binding to metal oxides in aqueous solutions is often inhibited by synthetic difficulties. We report here a systematic synthesis approach for preparing a family of Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes of the type [Ru(4,4'-R2-bpy)2(4,4'-(PO3H2)2-bpy)](2+) (4,4'(PO3H2)2-bpy = [2,2'-bipyridine]-4,4'-diylbis(phosphonic acid); 4,4'-R2-bpy = 4,4'-R2-2,2'-bipyridine; and R = OCH3, CH3, H, or Br). In this series, the nature of the 4,4'-R2-bpy ligand is modified through the incorporation of electron-donating (R = OCH3 or CH3) or electron-withdrawing (R = Br) functionalities to tune redox potentials and excited-state energies. Electrochemical measurements show that the ground-state potentials, E(o')(Ru(3+/2+)), vary from 1.08 to 1.45 V (vs NHE) when the complexes are immobilized on TiO2 electrodes in aqueous HClO4 (0.1 M) as a result of increased Ru dπ-π* back-bonding caused by the lowering of the π* orbitals on the 4,4'-R2-bpy ligand. The same ligand variations cause a negligible shift in the metal-to-ligand charge-transfer absorption energies. Emission energies decrease from λmax = 644 to 708 nm across the series. Excited-state redox potentials are derived from single-mode Franck-Condon analyses of room-temperature emission spectra and are discussed in the context of DSPEC applications.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25532589     DOI: 10.1021/ic501682k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inorg Chem        ISSN: 0020-1669            Impact factor:   5.165


  6 in total

1.  Correlating the para-Substituent Effects on Ru(II)-Polypyridine Photophysical Properties and on the Corresponding Hybrid P450 BM3 Enzymes Photocatalytic Activity.

Authors:  Hadil Shalan; Alexander Colbert; Thanh Truc Nguyen; Mallory Kato; Lionel Cheruzel
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.165

Review 2.  Dye-sensitized solar cells strike back.

Authors:  Ana Belén Muñoz-García; Iacopo Benesperi; Gerrit Boschloo; Javier J Concepcion; Jared H Delcamp; Elizabeth A Gibson; Gerald J Meyer; Michele Pavone; Henrik Pettersson; Anders Hagfeldt; Marina Freitag
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  Heterogeneous water oxidation photocatalysis based on periodic mesoporous organosilica immobilizing a tris(2,2'-bipyridine)ruthenium sensitizer.

Authors:  Minoru Waki; Soichi Shirai; Ken-Ichi Yamanaka; Yoshifumi Maegawa; Shinji Inagaki
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.036

4.  Surface-modified, dye-sensitized niobate nanosheets enabling an efficient solar-driven Z-scheme for overall water splitting.

Authors:  Shunta Nishioka; Koya Hojo; Langqiu Xiao; Tianyue Gao; Yugo Miseki; Shuhei Yasuda; Toshiyuki Yokoi; Kazuhiro Sayama; Thomas E Mallouk; Kazuhiko Maeda
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 14.957

5.  Water splitting with polyoxometalate-treated photoanodes: enhancing performance through sensitizer design.

Authors:  John Fielden; Jordan M Sumliner; Nannan Han; Yurii V Geletii; Xu Xiang; Djamaladdin G Musaev; Tianquan Lian; Craig L Hill
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.825

6.  Photoelectrochemical hydrogen production in water using a layer-by-layer assembly of a Ru dye and Ni catalyst on NiO.

Authors:  Manuela A Gross; Charles E Creissen; Katherine L Orchard; Erwin Reisner
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 9.825

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.