Literature DB >> 25532515

Effect of GnRH antagonists on clinical pregnancy rates in ovulation induction protocols with gonadotropins and intrauterine insemination.

Ramazan Dansuk1, Ali Ihsan Gonenc2, Sinem Sudolmus1, Oguz Yucel2, Osman Sevket1, Nadiye Köroğlu1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Intrauterine insemination (IUI) after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) was applied to selected infertile patients to determine the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists in IUI cycles, in which recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) had been used for COH.
METHODS: This study was conducted between April 1, 2009 and June 10, 2009, and involved a total of 108 patients. These patients had primary or secondary infertility, which resulted in an indication for IUI, and they each received two cycles of ovarian stimulation treatment with clomiphene citrate. The patients were randomised into two groups--patients in group A received rFSH + GnRH antagonist (n = 45), while those in group B received only rFSH (n = 63).
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 31.84 ± 3.73 years and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.40 ± 1.88 kg/m(2). The mean age and BMI of the patients in groups A and B were not significantly different. There was no significant difference in the mean total rFSH dose administered (988.33 IU in group A and 871.83 IU in group B). When compared to group B, the mean number of follicles that were > 16 mm on the human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) trigger day was significantly higher in group A (1.58 and 1.86, respectively; p < 0.05). When the two groups were compared, there were no statistically significant differences in the number of cancelled cycles due to premature luteinisation (none in group A vs. two in group B) and the rate of clinical pregnancy (8.9% in group A vs. 7.9% in group B).
CONCLUSION: No significant improvement in the clinical pregnancy rates was observed when GnRH antagonists were used in COH + IUI cycles, despite the significant increase in the number of follicles that were > 16 mm on HCG trigger day.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GnRH antagonist; intrauterine insemination; ovarian stimulation; pregnancy rates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25532515      PMCID: PMC4469855          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2014192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  25 in total

Review 1.  Single versus double intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples.

Authors:  A E Cantineau; M J Heineman; B J Cohlen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Timing of intrauterine insemination: where are we?

Authors:  Guido Ragni; Edgardo Somigliana; Walter Vegetti
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network.

Authors:  D S Guzick; S A Carson; C Coutifaris; J W Overstreet; P Factor-Litvak; M P Steinkampf; J A Hill; L Mastroianni; J E Buster; S T Nakajima; D L Vogel; R E Canfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-01-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E G Hughes
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Progesterone levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration in cycles with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist suppression are not predictive of pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  M C Edelstein; H J Seltman; B J Cox; S M Robinson; R A Shaw; S J Muasher
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Timing ovulation for intrauterine insemination with a GnRH antagonist.

Authors:  J L Gómez-Palomares; B Juliá; B Acevedo-Martín; M Martínez-Burgos; E R Hernández; E Ricciarelli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-11-26       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 7.  Stimulated intra-uterine insemination is not a natural choice for the treatment of unexplained subfertility. 'Effective treatment' or 'not a natural choice'?

Authors:  Edward G Hughes
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Selective use of leuprolide acetate in women undergoing superovulation with intrauterine insemination results in significant improvement in pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  D L Manzi; S Dumez; L B Scott; J C Nulsen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 9.  The use of GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  F Olivennes; J S Cunha-Filho; R Fanchin; P Bouchard; R Frydman
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Suppression of the endogenous luteinizing hormone surge by the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix during ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  K Diedrich; C Diedrich; E Santos; C Zoll; S al-Hasani; T Reissmann; D Krebs; D Klingmüller
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in ovulatory women with infertility.

Authors:  Astrid Ep Cantineau; Anouk Gh Rutten; Ben J Cohlen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-05

2.  Comparison of Two Regimens of Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonists in Clomiphene-gonadotropin Induced Controlled Ovulation and Intrauterine Insemination Cycles: Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Sajja Devendra Siva Karthik; Alka Kriplani; Garima Kachhawa; Rajesh Khadgawat; Nutan Aggarwal; Neerja Bhatla
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.