BACKGROUND: DataSHIELD (Data Aggregation Through Anonymous Summary-statistics from Harmonised Individual levEL Databases) has been proposed to facilitate the co-analysis of individual-level data from multiple studies without physically sharing the data. In a previous paper, we investigated whether DataSHIELD could protect participant confidentiality in accordance with UK law. In this follow-up paper, we investigate whether DataSHIELD addresses a broader range of ethics-related data-sharing concerns. METHODS: Ethics-related data-sharing concerns of Institutional Review Boards, ethics experts, international research consortia and research participants were identified through a literature search and systematically examined at a multidisciplinary workshop to determine whether DataSHIELD proposes mechanisms which can address these concerns. RESULTS: DataSHIELD addresses several ethics-related data-sharing concerns related to privacy, confidentiality, and the protection of the research participant's rights while sharing data and after the data have been shared. The data remain entirely under the direct management of the study that collected them. Data processing commands are strictly supervised, and the data are queried in a protected environment. Issues related to the return of individual research results when data are shared are eliminated; the responsibility for return remains at the study of origin. CONCLUSION: DataSHIELD can provide an innovative and robust solution for addressing commonly encountered ethics-related data-sharing concerns.
BACKGROUND: DataSHIELD (Data Aggregation Through Anonymous Summary-statistics from Harmonised Individual levEL Databases) has been proposed to facilitate the co-analysis of individual-level data from multiple studies without physically sharing the data. In a previous paper, we investigated whether DataSHIELD could protect participant confidentiality in accordance with UK law. In this follow-up paper, we investigate whether DataSHIELD addresses a broader range of ethics-related data-sharing concerns. METHODS: Ethics-related data-sharing concerns of Institutional Review Boards, ethics experts, international research consortia and research participants were identified through a literature search and systematically examined at a multidisciplinary workshop to determine whether DataSHIELD proposes mechanisms which can address these concerns. RESULTS: DataSHIELD addresses several ethics-related data-sharing concerns related to privacy, confidentiality, and the protection of the research participant's rights while sharing data and after the data have been shared. The data remain entirely under the direct management of the study that collected them. Data processing commands are strictly supervised, and the data are queried in a protected environment. Issues related to the return of individual research results when data are shared are eliminated; the responsibility for return remains at the study of origin. CONCLUSION: DataSHIELD can provide an innovative and robust solution for addressing commonly encountered ethics-related data-sharing concerns.
Authors: Menno Mostert; Annelien L Bredenoord; Monique C I H Biesaart; Johannes J M van Delden Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Philippe Lambin; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Timo M Deist; Jurgen Peerlings; Evelyn E C de Jong; Janita van Timmeren; Sebastian Sanduleanu; Ruben T H M Larue; Aniek J G Even; Arthur Jochems; Yvonka van Wijk; Henry Woodruff; Johan van Soest; Tim Lustberg; Erik Roelofs; Wouter van Elmpt; Andre Dekker; Felix M Mottaghy; Joachim E Wildberger; Sean Walsh Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Andrew J Atkin; Stuart J H Biddle; Stephanie T Broyles; Mai Chinapaw; Ulf Ekelund; Dale W Esliger; Bjorge H Hansen; Susi Kriemler; Jardena J Puder; Lauren B Sherar; Esther M F van Sluijs Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Jeffrey A Cohen; Maria Trojano; Ellen M Mowry; Bernard Mj Uitdehaag; Stephen C Reingold; Ruth Ann Marrie Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2019-11-28 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Joshua D Shur; Simon J Doran; Santosh Kumar; Derfel Ap Dafydd; Kate Downey; James P B O'Connor; Nikolaos Papanikolaou; Christina Messiou; Dow-Mu Koh; Matthew R Orton Journal: Radiographics Date: 2021-10 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Anjoeka Pronk; Miranda Loh; Eelco Kuijpers; Maria Albin; Jenny Selander; Lode Godderis; Manosij Ghosh; Roel Vermeulen; Susan Peters; Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum; Michelle C Turner; Vivi Schlünssen; Marcel Goldberg; Manolis Kogevinas; Barbara N Harding; Svetlana Solovieva; Tina Garani-Papadatos; Martie van Tongeren; Rob Stierum Journal: Environ Epidemiol Date: 2022-02-17