| Literature DB >> 25531749 |
Ryan Bosworth1, Trudy Ann Cameron2, J R DeShazo3.
Abstract
As the US pursues health care reform, it is important to understand the patterns in demand for, and opposition to, public provision of medical treatments. Using data from a nationally representative survey, we develop and estimate a utility-theoretic choice model to quantify demand for publicly provided medical treatment policies. We find diminishing marginal utility for increased recoveries and avoided premature deaths. We also show how the utility associated with different types of treatment policies varies with the socio-demographic group that would benefit (e.g. men, women, children, and seniors) and the program's duration and scope. Our model further permits utility, and hence willingness to pay, to vary with each respondent's own gender, age, race, income, community ethnic fractionalization and immigrant composition, as well as the respondent's expected private benefits from the policy and attitude toward government interventions and overall health care funding allocations. Self-interest is a prevailing finding.Entities:
Keywords: Discounting; Morbidity and mortality reduction; Public health treatment policies; Stated preference conjoint survey; Willingness to pay
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25531749 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.10.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Econ ISSN: 0167-6296 Impact factor: 3.883