Literature DB >> 25531552

Effects of blood pressure reduction in mild hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Johan Sundström, Hisatomi Arima, Rod Jackson, Fiona Turnbull, Kazem Rahimi, John Chalmers, Mark Woodward, Bruce Neal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effects of blood pressure reduction in persons with grade 1 hypertension are unclear.
PURPOSE: To investigate whether pharmacologic blood pressure reduction prevents cardiovascular events and deaths in persons with grade 1 hypertension. DATA SOURCES: Trials included in the BPLTTC (Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration) and trials identified from a previous review and electronic database searches. STUDY SELECTION: Patients without cardiovascular disease with blood pressures in the grade 1 hypertension range (140 to 159/90 to 99 mm Hg) who were randomly assigned to an active (antihypertensive drug or more intensive regimen) or control (placebo or less intensive regimen) blood pressure-lowering regimen. DATA EXTRACTION: Individual-patient data from BPLTTC trials and aggregate data from other trials were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed for all trials. DATA SYNTHESIS: Individual-patient data involved 10 comparisons from trials where most patients had diabetes, and aggregate data involved 3 comparisons from trials of patients without diabetes. The average blood pressure reduction was about 3.6/2.4 mm Hg. Over 5 years, odds ratios were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.01) for total cardiovascular events, 0.72 (CI, 0.55 to 0.94) for strokes, 0.91 (CI, 0.74 to 1.12) for coronary events, 0.80 (CI, 0.57 to 1.12) for heart failure, 0.75 (CI, 0.57 to 0.98) for cardiovascular deaths, and 0.78 (CI, 0.67 to 0.92) for total deaths. Results were similar in secondary analyses. Withdrawal from treatment due to adverse effects was more common in the active groups. LIMITATION: Blood pressure reductions and numbers of events were small.
CONCLUSION: Blood pressure-lowering therapy is likely to prevent stroke and death in patients with uncomplicated grade 1 hypertension. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, Swedish Research Council, Australian Research Council, and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25531552     DOI: 10.7326/M14-0773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  77 in total

Review 1.  Drugs for Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Kunal N Karmali; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Mark A Berendsen; David C Goff; Darshak M Sanghavi; Nina C Brown; Liliya Korenovska; Mark D Huffman
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Cardiovascular-related healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with hypertension switching from metoprolol to nebivolol.

Authors:  Stephanie Chen; An-Chen Fu; Rahul Jain; Hiangkiat Tan
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2015-04

Review 3.  Options for basing Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) on chronic disease endpoints: report from a joint US-/Canadian-sponsored working group.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Yetley; Amanda J MacFarlane; Linda S Greene-Finestone; Cutberto Garza; Jamy D Ard; Stephanie A Atkinson; Dennis M Bier; Alicia L Carriquiry; William R Harlan; Dale Hattis; Janet C King; Daniel Krewski; Deborah L O'Connor; Ross L Prentice; Joseph V Rodricks; George A Wells
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Loss of reticulocalbin 2 lowers blood pressure and restrains ANG II-induced hypertension in vivo.

Authors:  Jing Li; Sylvia Cechova; Lina Wang; Brant E Isakson; Thu H Le; Weibin Shi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2019-04-03

Review 5.  Impact of Hypertension on Cognitive Function: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Costantino Iadecola; Kristine Yaffe; José Biller; Lisa C Bratzke; Frank M Faraci; Philip B Gorelick; Martha Gulati; Hooman Kamel; David S Knopman; Lenore J Launer; Jane S Saczynski; Sudha Seshadri; Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  [Optimal blood pressure control : The SPRINT study].

Authors:  T Philipp; S Nitschmann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.743

7.  Pharmacogenomic Genome-Wide Meta-Analysis of Blood Pressure Response to β-Blockers in Hypertensive African Americans.

Authors:  Yan Gong; Zhiying Wang; Amber L Beitelshees; Caitrin W McDonough; Taimour Y Langaee; Karen Hall; Siegfried O F Schmidt; Robert W Curry; John G Gums; Kent R Bailey; Eric Boerwinkle; Arlene B Chapman; Stephen T Turner; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Julie A Johnson
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 8.  Preventing Diabetes and Atherosclerosis in the Cardiometabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Muhammad Imtiaz Ahmad; Michael D Shapiro
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 9.  Hypertension pharmacogenomics: in search of personalized treatment approaches.

Authors:  Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Julie A Johnson
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 28.314

10.  Estimating Longitudinal Risks and Benefits From Cardiovascular Preventive Therapies Among Medicare Patients: The Million Hearts Longitudinal ASCVD Risk Assessment Tool: A Special Report From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology.

Authors:  Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Mark D Huffman; Kunal N Karmali; Darshak M Sanghavi; Janet S Wright; Colleen Pelser; Martha Gulati; Frederick A Masoudi; David C Goff
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.