Cocaine abuse is problematic, directly and indirectly impacting the lives of millions, and yet existing therapies are inadequate and usually ineffective. A cocaine vaccine would be a promising alternative therapeutic option, but efficacy is hampered by variable production of anticocaine antibodies. Thus, new tactics and strategies for boosting cocaine vaccine immunogenicity must be explored. Flagellin is a bacterial protein that stimulates the innate immune response via binding to extracellular Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) and also via interaction with intracellular NOD-like receptor C4 (NLRC4), leading to production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Reasoning that flagellin could serve as both carrier and adjuvant, we modified recombinant flagellin protein to display a cocaine hapten termed GNE. The resulting conjugates exhibited dose-dependent stimulation of anti-GNE antibody production. Moreover, when adjuvanted with alum, but not with liposomal MPLA, GNE-FliC was found to be better than our benchmark GNE-KLH. This work represents a new avenue for exploration in the use of hapten-flagellin conjugates to elicit antihapten immune responses.
Cocaine abuse is problematic, directly and indirectly impacting the lives of millions, and yet existing therapies are inadequate and usually ineffective. A cocaine vaccine would be a promising alternative therapeutic option, but efficacy is hampered by variable production of anticocaine antibodies. Thus, new tactics and strategies for boosting cocaine vaccine immunogenicity must be explored. Flagellin is a bacterial protein that stimulates the innate immune response via binding to extracellular Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) and also via interaction with intracellular NOD-like receptor C4 (NLRC4), leading to production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Reasoning that flagellin could serve as both carrier and adjuvant, we modified recombinant flagellin protein to display a cocaine hapten termed GNE. The resulting conjugates exhibited dose-dependent stimulation of anti-GNE antibody production. Moreover, when adjuvanted with alum, but not with liposomal MPLA, GNE-FliC was found to be better than our benchmark GNE-KLH. This work represents a new avenue for exploration in the use of hapten-flagellin conjugates to elicit antihapten immune responses.
According to the 2011
National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH),
there were an estimated 1.4 million cocaine users in the United States.[1] Overall, substance abuse costs exceed $600 billion
annually, but treatment can help reduce these costs.[2] Medications exist for treating withdrawal symptoms, and
counseling therapies can be used to modify a patient’s attitude
and behaviors regarding their addiction. However, even with these
therapies, it is extremely difficult for cocaine addicts to remain
abstinent. Thus, there is great need for more effective treatment
options.[3] Therapies currently in development
include drugs that act as agonists or antagonists (to mimic or compete
with cocaine), esterases[4] (to hydrolyze
cocaine), and antibodies (to sequester cocaine in the periphery and/or
set up a concentration gradient that draws cocaine out of the brain).
By targeting cocaine itself, rather than brain receptors, antibody-based
therapies tend to have fewer side effects.Currently, vaccines
against cocaine and other drugs of abuse are
being developed.[5] Such vaccines stimulate
the immune system to produce highly specific antibodies that bind
drug molecules in systemic circulation. Antibodies typically cannot
cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB); thus, antibody-bound drug
is prevented from crossing the BBB. This spares the brain reward system[6] and reduces the reinforcing effects of the drug.
Also, in drug overdose situations, passive immunization with an anticocaine
monoclonal antibody may lessen the severity of overdose symptoms.[7]Clinical studies of TA-CD, an alum-adjuvantedcocaine vaccine,[8] have provided insight
into the challenges that
anticocaine vaccines face. In a phase IIb trial of TA-CD, 38% of the
trial population, individuals with the highest anticocaine IgG concentrations
(≥43 μg/mL), had significantly more cocaine-free urine
samples than the other 62% of vaccinated subjects or the placebo group.[9] Nevertheless, subsequent trials failed to meet
their primary end points, and further development of TA-CD has been
halted. In order for a cocaine vaccine to be clinically successful,
it must be broadly efficacious. As such, it should aim to achieve
therapeutic antibody levels in all vaccinated patients. A major current
focus for vaccine improvement is the evaluation of adjuvants, which
help by triggering more robust immune responses and are particularly
useful when a nonadjuvanted vaccine antigen is only modestly immunogenic
at best.[10]For cocaine vaccines,
existing alternatives to alum adjuvant include
SAS,[11] RhinoVax,[12] and a lipopeptide,[13] the latter reportedly
being evaluated by Orson et al.[10c] Opportunities
for rational vaccine design have been greatly expanded by the elucidation
of several major signaling pathways involved in innate and adaptive
immunity. Particularly, Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are becoming widely
regarded as key role players in regulating innate and adaptive immune
responses to antigens, and the direct targeting of TLRs via carefully
constructed subunit vaccines has become an area of intense scientific
inquiry.[14] Furthermore, combinations of
adjuvants are being studied in an effort to achieve synergy in stimulation
of the desired immune response. Indeed, simultaneous targeting of
multiple nonredundant (e.g., TLR and non-TLR) pathways can boost the
immune response to a given antigen.[15]Our current strategy was to use flagellin in a dual role as carrier
and adjuvant because it is both a potent immunostimulant and a protein
to which haptens may be covalently attached.[16] Flagellin, a major structural protein of bacterial flagella, consists
of a hypervariable domain (HVD) flanked by conserved N- and C-terminal
domains, which bind to Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5).[17] TLR5, the only protein-binding TLR, is conserved across
most invertebrates and is found mainly on epithelial cells, monocytes,
and dendritic cells, but also on T cells.[18] Binding of flagellin to TLR5 induces MyD88-dependent TH2 cytokine
production.[19] Meanwhile, flagellin also
signals via the NLRC4 inflammasome, a MyD88-independent mechanism
for innate immune signaling.[20] There is
very recent evidence that a third nonredundant pathway may be involved
in flagellin-mediated immune responses.[21] Importantly, prior exposure to flagellin does not induce tolerance.[22]Early studies of flagellin binding demonstrated
that peptide sequences
could be inserted into the HVD of flagellin without affecting binding
function, opening up the possibility of using flagellin fusion proteins,
exploiting conjugation chemistry, and other applications.[23] Indeed, recombinant antigen-flagellin fusion
protein vaccine formulations have been directed against a variety
of bacterial (Clostridium difficile,[24]Pseudomonas aeruginosa,[25] and Yersinia pestis(26)) and viral (influenza,[27] vaccinia,[28] and West Nile[29])
pathogenic threats. In these cases, flagellin was shown to increase
antibody-dependent protective responses resulting in significantly
higher antibody titers. Importantly, from a clinical standpoint, flagellin
fusion proteins are safe, well tolerated, and efficacious even at
low doses.[27a,30]Beyond our attraction to
flagellin as an adjuvant, per se, we envisioned
that a hapten-flagellin conjugate would meanwhile adhere to the principle
of colocalization of antigen and adjuvant for maximizing the immune
response.[31] In fact, Huleatt et al. have
already shown that one must attach antigen directly to flagellin in
order to reap the adjuvant benefit; the corresponding admixture failed
to augment the immune response.[22a] Therefore,
we hypothesized that recombinant flagellin protein, suitably decorated
with cocaine haptens, would represent a potent means for achieving
enhanced anticocaine antibody production.
Materials and Methods
Expression
and Purification of Recombinant FliC
The
bacterial strain Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis was purchased from the American Type Culture
Collection (ATCC #13076), and genomic DNA was prepared from bacterial
cultures (PureLink Genomic DNA Mini Kit from Invitrogen). The flagellin
gene fliC was amplified by PCR and subcloned into the pET29a expression
vector (Novagen) using NdeI and BamHI restriction sites thereby appending a C-terminal His tag as previously
described.[32] The recombinant flagellin
protein FliC was overexpressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3)
cells and purified using TALON cobalt metal affinity resin (Clontech)
under denaturing conditions. In brief, ∼12 g of cell paste
was resuspended in 225 mL of extraction/wash buffer consisting of
50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, 6 M guanidine-HCl, and 300 mM NaCl
(buffer A). Following clarification by centrifugation, the supernatant
was added to pre-equilibrated TALON resin and batch bound. After washing
with buffer A, the protein was eluted with 75 mL of elution buffer
consisting of 45 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, 5.4 M guanidine-HCl,
270 mM NaCl, and 150 mM imidazole (buffer B). The eluted protein was
dialyzed against phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4. Endotoxin
was removed by performing 1% (v/v) Triton X-114 extractions[33] followed by dialysis against 50 mM ammonium
bicarbonate. The protein was lyophilized until dry and stored at −20
°C. Upon reconstitution in PBS, pH 7.4, FliC was qualitatively
evaluated by SDS-PAGE (purity of >95% homogeneity) and quantified
using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay (Pierce). The endotoxin
level was measured with the Limulus amebocyte lysate
assay (Thermo Scientific) and determined to be <1 pg/μg of
protein. Additionally, a gel band was submitted to trypsin digest
and MS/MS proteomics analysis to confirm the identity of the protein
as phase-1 Salmonella flagellin.
mTLR5 Reporter
Assay
HEK-Blue mTLR5 cells (InvivoGen)
provide a TLR5-specific gene reporter assay system relying on TLR5
stimulation by TLR5 agonists and were used to determine the ability
of our recombinant FliC to stimulate TLR5 before and after hapten
conjugation. Colorimetric assays were conducted in 96-well plates
with ∼2.5 × 104 cells per well and FliC concentrations
of 100, 50, and 10 ng/mL in the presence of HEK-Detection Medium (InvivoGen)
as specified by the manufacturer. After incubation for 7 h, absorbance
was recorded at 620 nm to quantify TLR5 stimulation. Commercial flagellin
(FLA-ST Ultrapure, InvivoGen) was used a positive control; water was
used as a negative control. Recombinant FliC and GNE-FliC conjugates
prepared in this study were similarly evaluated.
Preparation
of GNE-FliC Conjugates
The cocaine hapten
GNE was synthesized from cocaine (NIDA Drug Supply Program), activated
using standard conditions,[11,34] and conjugated to available
lysine residues on flagellin. Lyophilized FliC was reconstituted in
PBS pH 7.4 to ∼5 mg/mL, then dialyzed against MOPS pH 7.2 buffer
prior to use in conjugations. Flagellin was then aliquoted into clean
microtubes, and sulfo-NHS activated GNE was added at a ratio of 1:1
(GNE to flagellin by weight; molar ratio is 1:137) and gently shaken
at 4 °C for 18–24 h. Similarly, GNE-BSA and GNE-KLH were
prepared (Scheme 1). After conjugation, each
GNE-protein conjugate was dialyzed against PBS using a Slide-A-Lyzer
10K MWCO dialysis device. After 2 h, the buffer was exchanged, and
dialysis was continued overnight. Conjugates were quantified by BCA
assay (Pierce) and stored at 4 °C until further use.
Scheme 1
Preparation
of GNE Conjugates to FliC, KLH, and BSA
Hapten
synthesis is reported
elsewhere. (1) Hapten GNE was activated using EDC and sulfo-NHS in
DMF/H2O at room temperature for 4 h. (2) Activated hapten
was then mixed with protein (FliC, KLH, or BSA) in MOPS buffer pH
7.2 at 4 °C for 18–24 h.
Preparation
of GNE Conjugates to FliC, KLH, and BSA
Hapten
synthesis is reported
elsewhere. (1) Hapten GNE was activated using EDC and sulfo-NHS in
DMF/H2O at room temperature for 4 h. (2) Activated hapten
was then mixed with protein (FliC, KLH, or BSA) in MOPS buffer pH
7.2 at 4 °C for 18–24 h.
Mass Spectral
Analysis
In order to quantify hapten
density for GNE-FliC conjugates prepared in this study, samples were
routinely submitted for MALDI-TOF and ESI-TOF MS analysis and compared
with unmodified FliC, as per the formula: hapten density = (MWGNE-FliC – MWFliC)/(MWGNE – MWwater); MWFliC = 55246 Da.
Fluorometric
Assay
The fluorometric assay of FliC and
GNE-FliC conjugates was performed in Costar 96-well black clear-bottom
plates. Each well was filled with 200 μL of PBS-buffer (pH 7.4).
Twenty micrograms of FliC or GNE-FliC conjugate in PBS-buffer was
added, followed by 5 μL of a freshly prepared fluorescamine
in DMSO solution (10 mg/mL), mixed well and analyzed after 5 min.
BSA calibration curves were routinely measured prior to FliC analysis
as quality control. Fluorescence end point analysis was performed
on a SpectraMax M2e microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale,
CA, USA) with the settings as follows: excitation, λ = 400 nm;
emission, λ = 475 nm; cutoff, λ = 455 nm; speed, normal;
reads/well, 30; bottom read. Assays were independently performed in
triplicate and obtained values normalized to unconjugated FliC. Relative
average values with standard deviation are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2
Estimation
of the relative hapten density by a fluorometric assay.
Given hapten densities were obtained from MALDI-MS spectra. Each assay
was performed in triplicate and average values with standard deviation
are depicted.
Modeling and Computational Analysis of GNE-FliC
In
order to gain an appreciation for the nature of flagellin binding
to TLR5, with and without GNEcocaine haptens present, we constructed
a homology model and performed computational analysis (i.e., number
of lysines per domain and relative solvent accessibility). A homology
model of Salmonella flagellin enterica serovar Dublin including the D0 domain was created
in Modeler.[35] The homology model was generated
using the structure of full-length Salmonella flagellin enterica serovar Typhimurium (PDB accession
code 3A5X(36)) as the model for the D0 domain and the crystal
structure of Salmonella flagellin enterica serovar Dublin ΔD0 in complex with the N-terminal
fragment of zebrafishTLR5 (PDB accession code 3V47(17a)). The D0 domains of Salmonella flagellin enterica serovar Dublin and enterica serovar Typhimurium are conserved (94% identical,
99% similar). The final homology model contains flagellin D0-D1-D2
domains, but not the hypervariable D3 because there is no homologous
template structure for this domain. We analyzed the spatial distribution
of flagellin lysine residues in the context of the flagellin-TLR5
complex and calculated solvent accessible surface area for each lysine
in our homology model.
Preparation of Vaccine Formulations
For the dose-ranging
aspect of our study of GNE-FliC in mice, we simply diluted GNE-FliC
in PBS pH 7.4 to final concentrations of 1000, 500, 100, and 10 μg/mL.
For these four groups, since no additional adjuvant was incorporated,
the injection volume was 100 μL per mouse. As such, each mouse
received a dose of 100, 50, 10, or 1 μg GNE-FliC, respectively.
For the adjuvant formulation aspect of our study, both alum and liposomal
MPLA were evaluated, and in these cases, injection volume was 200
μL per mouse. Two of these groups were given either GNE-FliC
or GNE-KLH (100 μg per mouse), using 1 mg/mL GNE-protein conjugate
mixed with an equal volume of Imject Alum Adjuvant (Thermo Scientific).
Finally, two of these groups were given GNE-FliC (10 or 50 μg
per mouse), using either 50 or 250 μg/mL GNE-FliC formulated
in liposomal MPLA. Liposomal MPLA[37] was
prepared as follows: the four components (DMPC, cholesterol, DMPG,
synthetic MPLA, all from Avanti Polar Lipids) were combined at a molar
ratio of 9 to 7.5 to 1 to 0.0454 in chloroform/methanol, concentrated
under reduced pressure on a rotary evaporator to a thin lipid film,
then left under high vacuum overnight to remove trace organic solvent,
then rehydrated with PBS pH 7.4 using the freeze–thaw–vortex
method (three cycles), and combined with GNE-FliC to achieve the above-specified
concentrations. The liposomal formulations produced in this manner
had 40 μg of MPLA per dose.
Experimental Animals
Thirty male BALB/cByJ mice were
obtained from the internal TSRI breeding colony. Mice were transferred
to arrive at 7–8 weeks of age and were housed 4/cage in a temperature-
and humidity-controlled, Association for Assessment and Accreditation
of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) accredited, vivarium facility within
a room maintained on a 12:12 h reverse light cycle (lights off 9:00
AM). Food and water were available ad libitum in
microisolator cages enriched with cut 3 in. PVC tubing. All procedures
were approved by TSRI’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
(IACUC) and performed in accordance with the Guide for Care
and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Vaccination Protocols
Mice (n = 3–5
per group) were given subcutaneous injections (100 or 200 μL
total volume) at 0, 3, and 6 weeks (Figure 1). Nonterminal bleeds (tail tip amputation, ∼0.2 mL) were
collected at 4 and 7 weeks, and a terminal bleed (cardiac puncture,
∼1.25 mL) was collected at 8 weeks.
Figure 1
Mouse vaccination and
bleed schedule.
Mouse vaccination and
bleed schedule.
Body Weight
Mouse
weights were monitored over the time
course of study, concurrent with injection schedule.
Luminex Assay
Because animals receiving the highest
dose of GNE-FliC exhibited symptoms of compromised health (e.g., lack
of healthy weight gain), we elected to perform a multiplex assay of
cytokine levels. Mouse sera (bleed 1) were subjected to a Luminex
assay in which eight cytokines were measured: IL-1α, IL-1β,
IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12(p70), IFNγ, and TNFα.
Enzyme-Linked
Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
The anti-GNE
antibody response was characterized by ELISA using horseradish peroxidase
conjugated donkey antimouse IgG (H+L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 715-035-151)
as described elsewhere.[11a]
Radioimmunoassay
(RIA)
The anticocaine binding affinity
and concentration were quantified by equilibrium dialysis using 3H-radiolabeled cocaine (PerkinElmer, NET510250UC) as described
elsewhere.[11a] Because of the volume requirements
for RIA, only the terminal bleed (bleed 3) was analyzed by RIA, and
samples were pooled for each vaccine group. Thus, the results are average antibody affinities and concentrations.
Statistical
Analyses
All data are presented as mean
± standard error (SEM). Where appropriate, data were analyzed
using one-way ANOVA with treatment as the factor or two-way ANOVA
with the repeated measure of time as indicated by the experimental
design. Significant ANOVA was followed by posthoc comparison indicated
within the figure caption, with significance set at α < 0.05.
Results
To enable our study, we made high quality recombinant
flagellin
protein (FliC) suitable for vaccine development. During the optimization
phase of FliC purification, we occasionally observed a significant
lower-lying band on SDS-PAGE (Figure S1, Supporting
Information). MS/MS proteomics analysis (Figure S2, Supporting Information) confirmed the protein
to be flagellin, albeit with a lack of sequence coverage for both
the N- and C-termini, indicative of proteolytic degradation of the
D0 domain.[38] To prevent this degradation,
we avoided storage of flagellin in buffer for extended periods of
time. Thus, for long-term storage of recombinant flagellin protein,
we employed a protocol of dialysis against ammonium bicarbonate followed
by lyophilization until dry and then storage in a −20 °C
freezer.Hapten densities on the order of ∼7 GNE per
FliC monomer[16a] were typically observed
(compare Figure S3
with Figure S4, Supporting Information)
with a 1:1 hapten to protein ratio (mg basis) when conjugation was
performed at 4 °C. Increasing this ratio (e.g., 2:1) and performing
the conjugation at room temperature tended to yield GNE-FliC with
higher hapten densities (e.g., ∼15 to 20 GNE per FliC monomer).To develop a simple and straightforward assay to assess the degree
of haptenation as an alternative methodology to MALDI-TOF mass spectral
analysis, we optimized a fluorometric assay using fluorescamine to
label the available lysines on FliC and GNE-FliC conjugates for relative
quantification of the available lysine residues.[39] Fluorescamine selectively reacts with primary lysine amines
and the emission of the fluorescent product can be analyzed at λ
= 475 nm. After conjugation, each GNE-FliC conjugate was compared
to unconjugated FliC used as standard. As anticipated, fluorescence
intensity decreases in correlation with increasing hapten density
(Figure 2). Normalized
values were calculated, and a range between 0.2 and 0.5 (red lines)
was estimated as a suitable hapten density for immunization experiments.Estimation
of the relative hapten density by a fluorometric assay.
Given hapten densities were obtained from MALDI-MS spectra. Each assay
was performed in triplicate and average values with standard deviation
are depicted.Our flagellin model (Figures 3 and S5, Supporting Information) permitted us to survey
the spatial distribution and solvent accessibility of lysine residues.
All of the lysine side chains in our model structure are solvent accessible
and available for chemical coupling to GNE hapten. The majority of
lysine residues in flagellin are located in the variable D2 and D3
domains (25 out of 35 lysine residues). D2 and D3 are not implicated
in TLR5 binding and activation; thus, modification of these lysine
residues is expected to be well tolerated without impacting TLR5 activation.
However, attachment of GNE haptens to the remaining 10 lysine residues
located in the highly conserved D0 and D1 domains might attenuate
flagellin binding to TLR5. In particular, coupling of the large GNE
hapten to K135, which is located within the D1 domain and forms a
salt bridge to TLR5, could inhibit TLR5 binding. The results of our
mTLR5 reporter assay (Figure 4) indicate that
flagellin chemically modified with ∼7 GNE haptens per protein
molecule binds to and activates TLR5. In our experiments, we observed
that TLR5 activation is attenuated at higher hapten densities (i.e.,
above ∼10 GNE per flagellin). It may be possible to improve
GNE-FliC by mutating select lysine residues in the D0 and D1 domains
to arginine. For example, the K135R mutation in flagellin could protect
the TLR5 binding interface against covalent modification with the
bulky GNE hapten, thus potentially preserving the ability of the modified
flagellin to activate TLR5 at even higher hapten densities.
Figure 3
Spatial distribution
of lysine residues in flagellin from Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Dublin bound to TLR5 (PDB 3V47(17a)). Flagellin
is shown as a yellow ribbon with lysine side chains depicted as spheres
colored by domain (subunit 1; D0, blue; D1, green; D2, magenta; D3,
not shown) and wheat colored surface (subunit 2). Two TLR5 subunits
are shown as light blue colored molecular surfaces. Inset table shows
number of lysine residues in each domain.
Figure 4
Flagellin (commercially available FLA-ST and our expressed
FliC)
and GNE-FliC conjugates (hapten densities in parentheses) tested at
three different concentrations (100, 50, and 10 ng/mL) in an mTLR5
reporter assay. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate, and error
bars signify SEM.
Spatial distribution
of lysine residues in flagellin from Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Dublin bound to TLR5 (PDB 3V47(17a)). Flagellin
is shown as a yellow ribbon with lysine side chains depicted as spheres
colored by domain (subunit 1; D0, blue; D1, green; D2, magenta; D3,
not shown) and wheat colored surface (subunit 2). Two TLR5 subunits
are shown as light blue colored molecular surfaces. Inset table shows
number of lysine residues in each domain.Recombinant FliC showed roughly equivalent binding capabilities
to positive control (FLA-ST), confirming the integrity of our expressed
and purified flagellin protein. To ensure GNE-FliC conjugates still
activate TLR5, prior to their inclusion in vaccine formulations for
mice, we repeated the TLR5 reporter assay (Figure 4). Despite bearing a number of GNE haptens, modified flagellin
protein still activates TLR5, although agonist function drops off
as hapten density exceeds ∼10. Whereas TLR5 agonism is fully
maintained using GNE-FliC with hapten density of ∼7, a marked
reduction (∼65%) in agonism is observed when the hapten density
is ∼15. Further reduction in agonism is observed with further
increases in hapten density; e.g., flagellin’s ability to activate
TLR5 is severely compromised when ∼24 GNE haptens per FliC
are present. The decision to use a given lot of GNE-FliC in mouse
immunization studies was guided by the following selection criteria:
(a) Does it have sufficient GNE hapten density? (b) Does it still
activate TLR5 expression? Using these mTLR5 assay results as a guide,
we selected GNE-FliC with hapten densities of ∼7 for use in
mouse immunizations.Flagellin (commercially available FLA-ST and our expressed
FliC)
and GNE-FliC conjugates (hapten densities in parentheses) tested at
three different concentrations (100, 50, and 10 ng/mL) in an mTLR5
reporter assay. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate, and error
bars signify SEM.The dose-ranging component
of our study of GNE-FliC in mice revealed
that our standard hapten-protein dose of 100 μg per injection
is not well tolerated when using flagellin protein. Each mouse received
a dose of 100, 50, 10, or 1 μg GNE-FliC. The mice that received
100 μg of GNE-FliC exhibited weight loss, and the mice that
received 50 μg of GNE-FliC exhibited attenuated weight gain,
compared to the lower dose groups (Figure 5). It is known that high doses of flagellin (∼300 μg
i.v.) induce septic shock, and even 10 μg i.p. induces inflammatory
alterations characteristic of sepsis.[40] It will be important to further evaluate lower doses of GNE-FliC
in order to derive the adjuvant benefit while avoiding excessive pro-inflammatory
cytokine stimulation.
Figure 5
Body weight change over time course of study (n = 3–5 mice per group, error bars signify SEM).
Body weight change over time course of study (n = 3–5 mice per group, error bars signify SEM).Cytokine expression levels can
be conveniently monitored via multiplex,
bead-based assays, but the timing of analysis is critical. Typically,
cytokine spikes are observed within 2–24 h following stimulus.[41] However, in the present study, bleeds were collected
and analyzed 7 days following boost injection. By this point, most
cytokines had presumably resolved to near basal levels. Nevertheless,
we did identify a dose–response trend in the case of tumor
necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) (Figure 6). TNFα (or cachectin) is produced by activated macrophages,
is involved in systemic inflammation, and induces fever and cachexia.[42] TNFα levels were higher in the 100 μg
dose group than in the lower dose groups [dose: F3, 9 = 4.245, p < 0.05], and
the overall trend correlates with our observations of body weight
change in these mice. That is, an excess of GNE-FliC presumably elicits
hyperinflammation, consequences of which are elevated TNFα levels
(of prolonged duration) and inhibition of normal weight gain.[43]
Figure 6
Levels of TNFα in mice for the dose-ranging aspect
of this
study (n = 3–5 mice per group, analyzed individually,
error bars signify SEM). *p < 0.05 versus 1 and
10 μg groups (Fisher’s LSD posthoc).
Levels of TNFα in mice for the dose-ranging aspect
of this
study (n = 3–5 mice per group, analyzed individually,
error bars signify SEM). *p < 0.05 versus 1 and
10 μg groups (Fisher’s LSD posthoc).Although Simon et al. have reported protective responses
with submicrogram
doses of flagellin glycoconjugates,[16d] our
data indicate that 1 μg of GNE-FliC is insufficient in eliciting
a robust anticocaine antibody response (Figure 7a). This difference in dose effectiveness may be due to fundamental
dissimilarities in the nature of the antigen (in their case, carbohydrate;
in our case, cocaine hapten) as well as differences in the means by
which protection against the respective threat is assessed. We did,
however, observe modest to greatly improved titers with the other
doses evaluated, with the best dose being 50 μg [bleed ×
dose interaction: F6, 20 = 4.10, p < 0.01]. In this case, anti-GNE antibody midpoint titers
approached nearly 40,000 (bleed 2), which compares favorably with
anti-GNE antibody titers we have previously measured (28,000 in one
study and 31,000 in another).[11] Alum-adjuvantedGNE-FliC produced similar anti-GNE titer levels to alum-adjuvantedGNE-KLH over the course of vaccination [time, F2, 24 = 30.08, p < 0.001; treatment, p > 0.05; Figure 7b]. Liposomal
MPLA-adjuvanted
GNE-FliC elicited anti-GNE titer levels that were similar to alum-adjuvantedGNE-FliC, although doses of conjugate were not equivalent.
Figure 7
Anti-GNE IgG
titers measured by ELISA (n = 3–5
mice per group, analyzed individually in duplicate, error bars signify
SEM). Each trio of vertical bars represents bleeds 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
**p < 0.05 versus all other doses at specific
bleeds (Tukey’s posthoc).
Anti-GNEIgG
titers measured by ELISA (n = 3–5
mice per group, analyzed individually in duplicate, error bars signify
SEM). Each trio of vertical bars represents bleeds 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
**p < 0.05 versus all other doses at specific
bleeds (Tukey’s posthoc).Anticocaine antibody concentrations and affinities (Kd values) were then measured by radioimmunoassay.
The
bell-shaped dose–response curve observed for anti-GNE antibody
titers (Figure 7a) was likewise observed for
anticocaine antibody concentrations (Figure 8a). Additionally, some other interesting findings were revealed.
Despite exhibiting good anti-GNE titers (i.e., nearly 40,000 for the
50 μg dose), the corresponding anticocaine antibody concentrations
are rather low (i.e., ∼20 μg/mL for the 50 μg dose)
[dose: F3, 8 = 26.06, p < 0.001; Figure 8a]. By incorporating
alum, a dramatic boost in anticocaine antibody concentration is achieved.
In fact, alum-adjuvantedGNE-FliC elicited significantly higher anticocaine
antibody concentrations than alum-adjuvantedGNE-KLH (Fisher’s
LSD, p < 0.05). However, by incorporating liposomal
MPLA, no boost in anticocaine antibody concentration is achieved [treatment: F3, 8 = 48.40, p < 0.001;
Figure 8b]. Peak anti-GNE antibody titers,
as well as anticocaine antibody concentrations and affinities, are
also summarized in Table S1, Supporting Information.
Figure 8
Anticocaine Ab concentrations and affinities measured by RIA (Bleed
3) (n = 3–5 mice per group, pooled and analyzed
in triplicate, error bars signify SEM). **p < 0.01 versus all other doses; ***p < 0.001 versus
MPLA groups (Tukey’s posthoc); #p < 0.05 versus KLH control (planned comparison Fisher’s
LSD).
Anticocaine Ab concentrations and affinities measured by RIA (Bleed
3) (n = 3–5 mice per group, pooled and analyzed
in triplicate, error bars signify SEM). **p < 0.01 versus all other doses; ***p < 0.001 versus
MPLA groups (Tukey’s posthoc); #p < 0.05 versus KLH control (planned comparison Fisher’s
LSD).
Discussion
Given the precedent for
flagellin fusion proteins not needing additional
adjuvants (e.g., STF2.OVA[22a] and STF2.4xM2e[27d]), we first focused our study on looking at
various doses of GNE-FliC on its own. At the very basic level of analysis,
GNE-FliC does indeed elicit anticocaine antibodies and does so in
a dose-dependent fashion. Our data illustrate the oft-observed bell-shaped
or inverted U-shaped dose–response curve. Indeed, we found
that retreating from our standard dose of 100 μg of hapten-protein
conjugate (per animal, per injection) was beneficial with respect
to anti-GNE antibody titers and anticocaine antibody concentrations.
It is worth noting that many studies using flagellin fusion proteins
typically report optimal doses of 0.1 to 25 μg. In the dose-ranging
component of our study, our best result was obtained using a 50 μg
dose of GNE-FliC. It remains to be seen whether further fine-tuning
of the dose can yield further gains in overall anticocaine antibody
production. Nevertheless, it appears that maximal efficacy will be
possible through the incorporation of additional adjuvants into the
overall formulation, evidenced by our preliminary efforts in that
regard.We investigated two popular adjuvant formulation tactics:
alum
and liposomal MPLA. Flagellin itself induces a TH2 response, heavily
favoring IgG1 production.[16a,22a,44] Alum also induces a TH2 response,[45] while
MPLA inhibits TH2 response. Thus, a combination of flagellin and alum
may be synergistic for TH2 induction, whereas a combination of flagellin
and MPLA may be antagonistic.[46] In our
hands, s.c. alum/GNE-flagellin performed very well, markedly better
than s.c. alum/GNE-KLH (anticocaine antibody concentrations of 125
and 95 μg/mL, respectively; Figure 8b).
In previous work, we observed a similar level of anticocaine antibody
production using i.p. SAS/GNE-KLH (123.47 μg/mL in one study[11a] and 85.12 μg/mL in another[11b]). It may be that the alum/GNE-FliC formulation
permits activation of immune signaling via a variety of nonredundant
pathways (TLR5/MyD88, NLRC4 inflammasome, phagolysosome/NLRP3), the
combination of which ultimately provides robust antibody production.Meanwhile, at the 50 μg dose of GNE-FliC, liposomal MPLA/GNE-FliC
elicited comparable ELISA titers (Figure 7),
but lower anticocaine antibody concentrations (Figure 8), than GNE-FliC alone (12.7 and 19.1 μg/mL, respectively).
Thus, while a significant immunogenicity boost was realized through
the use of alum (see above), no such boost was realized through the
use of liposomal MPLA, at least, in the particular manner (i.e., method
of formulation, route of administration) in which liposomal MPLA was
used in this study. It should be noted that, although dual targeting
of TLR4/TLR5 via liposomal MPLA/GNE-FliC was unproductive here, other
combinations (e.g., TLR4/TLR8) are reportedly very effective.[47]
Conclusions
Our central aim was
to determine whether one might use flagellin
protein as both carrier and adjuvant. We have shown
that cocaine-flagellin conjugates do indeed stimulate the production
of anticocaine antibodies in mice, and this stimulation is dose-dependent.
Furthermore, our initial ventures into incorporating other adjuvants
(alum or liposomal MPLA) have suggested that significant gains can
be achieved. Indeed, the alum/GNE-FliC formulation performed better
than the alum/GNE-KLH formulation (Figure 8b). However, liposomal formulation of GNE-FliC elicited lower concentrations
of anticocaine antibodies. It is known that some TLR agonist combinations
are synergistic, while others are not.[46] Thus, TLR4 agonism combined with TLR5 agonism may be counterproductive
since the former inhibits TH2, while the latter induces TH2.Future avenues of inquiry and optimization include investigating
whether a CpG/Alum/GNE-FliC formulation (engaging endosomal TLR9,
NLRP3, and TLR5/NLRC4 collectively) and/or an alternative injection
route (e.g., i.m. instead of s.c.) will provide greater gains in anticocaine
antibody production.[48] Also, we wish to
examine mutants of FliC in which specific lysine residues (particularly
in the D0 and D1 domains) are replaced with arginine residues; this
would serve the purpose of precluding hapten modification of these
domains, which are known to be vital to TLR5 binding. The net effect
of optimizing these vaccine parameters will undoubtedly be more potent
production of anticocaine antibodies. Results of such endeavors will
be reported in due course.
Authors: Sung-il Yoon; Oleg Kurnasov; Venkatesh Natarajan; Minsun Hong; Andrei V Gudkov; Andrei L Osterman; Ian A Wilson Journal: Science Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sunmee Wee; Martin J Hicks; Bishnu P De; Jonathan B Rosenberg; Amira Y Moreno; Stephen M Kaminsky; Kim D Janda; Ronald G Crystal; George F Koob Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Raphael Simon; Sharon M Tennant; Jin Y Wang; Patrick J Schmidlein; Andrew Lees; Robert K Ernst; Marcela F Pasetti; James E Galen; Myron M Levine Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Jin Leng; Heather W Stout-Delgado; Uma Kavita; Andrea Jacobs; Jie Tang; Wei Du; Lynda Tussey; Daniel R Goldstein Journal: Vaccine Date: 2011-08-18 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: George Koob; Martin J Hicks; Sunmee Wee; Jonathan B Rosenberg; Bishnu P De; Stephen M Kaminsky; Amira Moreno; Kim D Janda; Ronald G Crystal Journal: CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.388
Authors: Lauren C Smith; Lucy Lin; Candy S Hwang; Bin Zhou; Diane M Kubitz; Huiying Wang; Kim D Janda Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Paulo Sérgio de Almeida Augusto; Raissa Lima Gonçalves Pereira; Sordaini Maria Caligiorne; Brian Sabato; Bruna Rodrigues Dias Assis; Larissa Pires do Espírito Santo; Karine Dias Dos Reis; Gisele Assis Castro Goulart; Ângelo de Fátima; Maila de Castro Lourenço das Neves; Frederico Duarte Garcia Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 15.992