| Literature DB >> 25530774 |
Rizwana Afroz1, E M Tanvir1, Md Fuad Hossain2, Siew Hua Gan3, Mashud Parvez4, Md Aminul Islam5, Md Ibrahim Khalil1.
Abstract
Honey, a supersaturated natural product of honey bees, contains complex compounds with antioxidant properties and therefore has a wide a range of applications in both traditional and modern medicine. In the present study, the protective effects of Sundarban honey from Bangladesh against acetaminophen- (APAP-) induced hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity in experimental rats were investigated. Adult male Wistar rats were pretreated with honey (5 g/kg) for 4 weeks, followed by the induction of hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity via the oral administration of a single dose of APAP (2 g/kg). Organ damage was confirmed by measuring the elevation of serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), total protein (TP), total bilirubin (TB), urea, creatinine, and malondialdehyde (MDA). Histopathological alterations observed in the livers and the kidneys further confirmed oxidative damage to these tissues. Animals pretreated with Sundarban honey showed significantly markedly reduced levels of all of the investigated parameters. In addition, Sundarban honey ameliorated the altered hepatic and renal morphology in APAP-treated rats. Overall, our findings indicate that Sundarban honey protects against APAP-induced acute hepatic and renal damage, which could be attributed to the honey's antioxidant properties.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25530774 PMCID: PMC4229961 DOI: 10.1155/2014/143782
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
The effects of APAP and honey on serum hepatic biomarkers among control and treated rats.
| Parameters | Treatment | Percentage change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Control + honey | Honey + APAP | APAP | Control + honey | Honey + APAP | APAP | |
| ALP (IU/L) | 182.81 ± 0.00 | 190.91 ± 23.31• | 192.89 ± 0.00# | 315.09 ± 14.16* | 4.43% | 5.51% | 72.36% |
| ALT (IU/L) | 32.69 ± 0.59 | 32.54 ± 0.54 | 73.17 ± 2.22# | 146.49 ± 0.00* | −0.45% | 123.83% | 348.12% |
| AST (IU/L) | 108.27 ± 1.01 | 100.12 ± 0.00 | 168.85 ± 0.00# | 268.98 ± 1.27* | −7.53% | 55.95% | 148.43% |
| TB (mg/dL) | 0.63 ± 0.03 | 0.65 ± 0.03 | 0.74 ± 0.01# | 1.36 ± 0.00* | 3.17% | 17.46% | 115.87% |
| TP (g/dL) | 3.27 ± 0.03 | 3.55 ± 0.23• | 3.41 ± 0.12# | 3.19 ± 0.01* | 8.56% | 4.28% | −2.45% |
Each value is the mean obtained for six rats ± SD; *symbol in each row indicating the significant difference between control and APAP group; •symbol in each row indicating the significant difference between control and control + honey group; #symbol in each row indicating the significant difference between APAP and honey + APAP at P < 0.05. Percentage change is calculated as 100 × [(value of treatment − value of control)/value of control].
The effects of APAP and honey on serum renal biomarkers among control and treated rats.
| Parameters | Treatment | Percentage change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Control + honey | Honey + APAP | APAP | Control + honey | Honey + APAP | APAP | |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.73 ± 0.03 | 0.72 ± 0.02 | 0.74 ± 0.01# | 0.93 ± 0.03* | −1.37% | 1.37% | 27.39% |
| Urea (mg/dL) | 30.57 ± 2.21 | 30.43 ± 2.09 | 31.23 ± 1.41# | 47.88 ± 0.97* | −0.46% | 2.16% | 56.62% |
Each value is the mean obtained for six rats ± SD; *symbol in each row indicating the significant difference between control and APAP group; #symbol in each row indicating the significant difference between APAP and honey + APAP at P < 0.05. Percentage change is calculated as 100 × [(value of treatment − value of control)/value of control].
Percentage change of serum hepatic biomarkers for Sundarban honey when compared to another type of honey.
| Parameters | Sundarban honey (%) | Sider honey (%) |
|---|---|---|
| ALP (IU/L) | 92.38 | 88.24 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 64.43 | 78.31 |
| AST (IU/L) | 62.30 | 82.79 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 95.00 | 112.64 |
| Urea (mg/dL) | 96.18 | 112.51 |
Percentage of protection conferred by each honey type is calculated as 100 × [(value of APAP or CCl4 − value of honey + APAP or honey + CCl4)/(value of APAP or CCl4 − value of control)].
Figure 1The effects of APAP and honey on MDA levels (nmol/mg of protein) in liver and kidney tissues. APAP treatment alone caused a significant (P < 0.05) increase in MDA levels in both liver and kidney tissues when compared with the control rats. Honey plus APAP group had significantly reduced the MDA levels in rat liver and kidney tissues when compared with APAP alone treated group (P < 0.05). No significant change was observed when control plus honey treated group was compared with control rats. Each value is the mean obtained for six rats ± SD; ∗ symbol in each bar indicating the significant difference between control and APAP group; # symbol in each bar indicating the significant difference between APAP and honey + APAP at P < 0.05.
Figure 2Hematoxylin-eosin-stained liver sections. (a) The control rat showed normal histopathology. (b) Rats treated with honey also showed normal histopathology. (c) Rats treated with honey followed by APAP intoxication and (d) rats treated with APAP showed morphological changes including CV distortion (blue arrows), inflammatory cells (yellow arrow), edema (green arrows), and necrosis (red arrows).
Figure 3Hematoxylin-eosin-stained kidney sections. (a) Control rat with normal histopathology. (b) Rats treated with honey. (c) Rats treated with honey followed by APAP intoxication. (d) Rats treated with APAP showing vacuolar degeneration of tubules (yellow arrow), a small glomerulus (green arrows), and intraluminal casts (red arrows).