Literature DB >> 25530357

Molecular characterization of mouse lens epithelial cell lines and their suitability to study RNA granules and cataract associated genes.

Anne M Terrell1, Deepti Anand1, Sylvie F Smith1, Christine A Dang1, Stephanie M Waters1, Mallika Pathania1, David C Beebe2, Salil A Lachke3.   

Abstract

The discovery of cytosolic RNA granule (RG) component proteins associated with human cataract has initiated investigations on post-transcriptional mechanisms of gene expression control in the lens. Application of established mouse lens epithelial cell lines (LECs) can provide rapid insights on RG function in lens cells, especially because mouse mutants in several RG components are not available. However, although these LECs represent potential reagents for such analyses, they are uncharacterized for lens gene expression or RG formation. Therefore, a detailed molecular and cellular characterization of three permanent mouse LECs 17EM15, 21EM15 and αTN4 is performed in this study. Comparative analysis between microarray gene expression datasets on LEC 21EM15 and iSyTE lens tissue demonstrates that 30% of top 200 iSyTE identified lens-enriched genes are expressed in these cells. Majority of these candidates are independently validated to either have lens expression, function or linkage to cataract. Moreover, analysis of microarray data with genes described in Cat-Map, an online database of cataract associated genes and loci, demonstrates that 131 genes linked to cataract loci are expressed in 21EM15 cells. Furthermore, gene expression in LECs is compared to isolated lens epithelium or fiber cells by qRT-PCR and by comparative analyses with publically available epithelium or fiber-specific microarray and RNA-seq (sequencing) datasets. Expression of select candidate genes was validated by regular and real-time quantitative RT-PCR. Expression of lens epithelium-enriched genes Foxe3, Pax6, Anxa4 and Mcm4 is up-regulated in LEC lines, compared to isolated lens fiber cells. Moreover, similar to isolated lens epithelium, all three LECs exhibit down-regulation of fiber cell-expressed genes Crybb1, Mip and Prox1 when compared to fiber cells. These data indicate that the LEC lines exhibit greater similarity to lens epithelium than to fiber cells. Compared to non-lens cell line NIH3T3, LECs exhibit significantly enriched expression of transcription factors with important function in the lens, namely Pax6, Foxe3 and Prox1. In addition to these genes, all three LECs also express key lens- and cataract-associated genes, namely Dkk3, Epha2, Hsf4, Jag1, Mab21l1, Meis1, Pknox1, Pou2f1, Sfrp1, Sparc, Tdrd7 and Trpm3. Additionally, 21EM15 microarrays indicate expression of Chmp4b, Cryab and Tcfap2a among others important genes. Immunostaining with makers for Processing bodies (P-bodies) and Stress granules (SGs) demonstrates that these classes of RGs are robustly expressed in all three LECs. Moreover, under conditions of stress, 17EM15 and αTN4 exhibit significantly higher numbers of P-bodies and SGs compared to NIH3T3 cells. In sum, these data indicate that mouse LECs 21EM15, 17EM15 and αTN4 express key lens or cataract genes, are similar to lens epithelium than fiber cells, and exhibit high levels of P-bodies and SGs, indicating their suitability for investigating gene expression control and RG function in lens-derived cells.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  17EM15; 21EM15; Cataract genes; Lens; Processing body; Stress granules; iSyTE; αTN4

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25530357      PMCID: PMC4387128          DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  110 in total

Review 1.  P bodies: at the crossroads of post-transcriptional pathways.

Authors:  Ana Eulalio; Isabelle Behm-Ansmant; Elisa Izaurralde
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Synthesis of alpha-crystallin by a cell line derived from the lens of a transgenic animal.

Authors:  T Yamada; T Nakamura; H Westphal; P Russell
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.424

3.  Inhibition of mTORC1 by astrin and stress granules prevents apoptosis in cancer cells.

Authors:  Kathrin Thedieck; Birgit Holzwarth; Mirja Tamara Prentzell; Christopher Boehlke; Kathrin Kläsener; Stefanie Ruf; Annika Gwendolin Sonntag; Lars Maerz; Sushma-Nagaraja Grellscheid; Elisabeth Kremmer; Roland Nitschke; E Wolfgang Kuehn; Johan W Jonker; Albert K Groen; Michael Reth; Michael N Hall; Ralf Baumeister
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Lens induction by Pax-6 in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  C R Altmann; R L Chow; R A Lang; A Hemmati-Brivanlou
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  iSyTE: integrated Systems Tool for Eye gene discovery.

Authors:  Salil A Lachke; Joshua W K Ho; Gregory V Kryukov; Daniel J O'Connell; Anton Aboukhalil; Martha L Bulyk; Peter J Park; Richard L Maas
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Mouse H6 Homeobox 1 (Hmx1) mutations cause cranial abnormalities and reduced body mass.

Authors:  Robert J Munroe; Vinay Prabhu; Greg M Acland; Kenneth R Johnson; Belinda S Harris; Tim P O'Brien; Ian C Welsh; Drew M Noden; John C Schimenti
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 1.978

7.  Hematopoietic, angiogenic and eye defects in Meis1 mutant animals.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Hisa; Sally E Spence; Rivka A Rachel; Masami Fujita; Takuro Nakamura; Jerrold M Ward; Deborah E Devor-Henneman; Yuriko Saiki; Haruo Kutsuna; Lino Tessarollo; Nancy A Jenkins; Neal G Copeland
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Domain disruption and mutation of the bZIP transcription factor, MAF, associated with cataract, ocular anterior segment dysgenesis and coloboma.

Authors:  Robyn V Jamieson; Rahat Perveen; Bronwyn Kerr; Martin Carette; Jill Yardley; Elise Heon; M Gabriela Wirth; Veronica van Heyningen; Di Donnai; Francis Munier; Graeme C M Black
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Loss of AND-34/BCAR3 expression in mice results in rupture of the adult lens.

Authors:  Richard I Near; Richard S Smith; Paul A Toselli; Thomas F Freddo; Alexander B Bloom; Pierre Vanden Borre; David C Seldin; Adam Lerner
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 2.367

10.  Histone posttranslational modifications and cell fate determination: lens induction requires the lysine acetyltransferases CBP and p300.

Authors:  Louise Wolf; Wilbur Harrison; Jie Huang; Qing Xie; Ningna Xiao; Jian Sun; Lingkun Kong; Salil A Lachke; Murali R Kuracha; Venkatesh Govindarajan; Paul K Brindle; Ruth Ashery-Padan; David C Beebe; Paul A Overbeek; Ales Cvekl
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  19 in total

1.  Deficiency of the RNA binding protein caprin2 causes lens defects and features of Peters anomaly.

Authors:  Soma Dash; Christine A Dang; David C Beebe; Salil A Lachke
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 2.  TRPM3_miR-204: a complex locus for eye development and disease.

Authors:  Alan Shiels
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.639

3.  The cataract-linked RNA-binding protein Celf1 post-transcriptionally controls the spatiotemporal expression of the key homeodomain transcription factors Pax6 and Prox1 in lens development.

Authors:  Sandeep Aryal; Justine Viet; Bailey A T Weatherbee; Archana D Siddam; Francisco G Hernandez; Carole Gautier-Courteille; Luc Paillard; Salil A Lachke
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Molecular characterization of the human lens epithelium-derived cell line SRA01/04.

Authors:  Bailey A T Weatherbee; Joshua R Barton; Archana D Siddam; Deepti Anand; Salil A Lachke
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  The master transcription factor SOX2, mutated in anophthalmia/microphthalmia, is post-transcriptionally regulated by the conserved RNA-binding protein RBM24 in vertebrate eye development.

Authors:  Soma Dash; Lindy K Brastrom; Shaili D Patel; C Anthony Scott; Diane C Slusarski; Salil A Lachke
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Aldose Reductase Mediates Transforming Growth Factor β2 (TGF-β2)-Induced Migration and Epithelial-To-Mesenchymal Transition of Lens-Derived Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Kun-Che Chang; J Mark Petrash
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Presenilin gene function and Notch signaling feedback regulation in the developing mouse lens.

Authors:  Mina Azimi; Tien T Le; Nadean L Brown
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.880

Review 8.  RNA-binding proteins and post-transcriptional regulation in lens biology and cataract: Mediating spatiotemporal expression of key factors that control the cell cycle, transcription, cytoskeleton and transparency.

Authors:  Salil A Lachke
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 9.  RNA-binding proteins in eye development and disease: implication of conserved RNA granule components.

Authors:  Soma Dash; Archana D Siddam; Carrie E Barnum; Sarath Chandra Janga; Salil A Lachke
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 9.957

Review 10.  Systems biology of lens development: A paradigm for disease gene discovery in the eye.

Authors:  Deepti Anand; Salil A Lachke
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.467

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.