Rafael de Macedo Coelho1, Thiago Trigueiro Morais de Paiva2, Ligia Andrade da Silva Telles Mathias3. 1. Centro de ensino e Treinamento (CET), Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. Electronic address: rafaelcoelho.md@gmail.com. 2. Centro de ensino e Treinamento (CET), Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. 3. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Disciplina de Anestesiologia e Dor, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cuffs of tracheal tubes protect the lower airway from aspiration of gastric contents and facilitate ventilation, but may cause many complications, especially when the cuff pressure exceeds 30cm H2O. This occurs in over 30% of conventional insufflations, so it is recommended to limit this pressure. In this study we evaluated the in vitro effectiveness of a method of limiting the cuff pressure to a range between 20 and 30cm H2O. METHOD: Using an adapter to connect the tested tube to the anesthesia machine, the relief valve was regulated to 30cm H2O, inflating the cuff by operating the rapid flow of oxygen button. There were 33 trials for each tube of three manufacturers, of five sizes (6.5 to 8.5), using three times inflation (10, 15 and 20seconds), totaling 1485 tests. After inflation, the pressure obtained was measured with a manometer. Pressure >30cm H2O or <20cm H2O were considered failures. RESULTS: There were eight failures (0.5%, 95% CI: 0.1-0.9%), with all by pressures <20cm H2O and after 10seconds inflation (1.6%, 95% CI: 0 5-2.7%). One failure occurred with a 6.5 tube (0.3%, 95% CI: -0.3-0.9%), six with 7.0 tubes (2%, 95% CI: 0.4 to 3.6%), and one with a 7.5 tube (0.3%, 95% CI: -0.3-0.9%). CONCLUSION: This method was effective for inflating tracheal tube cuffs of different sizes and manufacturers, limiting its pressure to a range between 20 and 30cm H2O, with a success rate of 99.5% (95% CI: 99.1-99.9%).
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cuffs of tracheal tubes protect the lower airway from aspiration of gastric contents and facilitate ventilation, but may cause many complications, especially when the cuff pressure exceeds 30cm H2O. This occurs in over 30% of conventional insufflations, so it is recommended to limit this pressure. In this study we evaluated the in vitro effectiveness of a method of limiting the cuff pressure to a range between 20 and 30cm H2O. METHOD: Using an adapter to connect the tested tube to the anesthesia machine, the relief valve was regulated to 30cm H2O, inflating the cuff by operating the rapid flow of oxygen button. There were 33 trials for each tube of three manufacturers, of five sizes (6.5 to 8.5), using three times inflation (10, 15 and 20seconds), totaling 1485 tests. After inflation, the pressure obtained was measured with a manometer. Pressure >30cm H2O or <20cm H2O were considered failures. RESULTS: There were eight failures (0.5%, 95% CI: 0.1-0.9%), with all by pressures <20cm H2O and after 10seconds inflation (1.6%, 95% CI: 0 5-2.7%). One failure occurred with a 6.5 tube (0.3%, 95% CI: -0.3-0.9%), six with 7.0 tubes (2%, 95% CI: 0.4 to 3.6%), and one with a 7.5 tube (0.3%, 95% CI: -0.3-0.9%). CONCLUSION: This method was effective for inflating tracheal tube cuffs of different sizes and manufacturers, limiting its pressure to a range between 20 and 30cm H2O, with a success rate of 99.5% (95% CI: 99.1-99.9%).